Catarina P. G. Neves, Jonathan L. Coffman, Suzanne S. Farid
{"title":"Evaluating end-to-end continuous antibody manufacture with column-free capture alternatives from economic, environmental, and robustness perspectives","authors":"Catarina P. G. Neves, Jonathan L. Coffman, Suzanne S. Farid","doi":"10.1002/btpr.3427","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Process intensification efforts have renewed interest in the potential of end-to-end continuous manufacture with column-free capture alternatives. This article describes a decisional tool that encompasses mass balance and design equations, process economics, stochastic simulation and multi-criteria decision-making and enables the evaluation of different batch, and continuous flowsheets for monoclonal antibody (mAb) manufacture. The traditional batch process was compared with end-to-end continuous bioprocesses with either protein A capture or column-free capture employing aqueous two-phase extraction or precipitation from economic, environmental, and robustness perspectives. The cost of goods analysis predicted that continuous flowsheets could offer substantial cost savings (~20%–40%) over the batch process at low and medium annual commercial demands (100–500 kg); however, at tonnage demands they resulted in either comparable or higher costs. Comparing the continuous options, the continuous flowsheets with protein A or precipitation yielded similar COG/g values, while aqueous two-phase extraction presented higher costs. The analysis of overall process mass intensities accounting for water and consumables suggested that the continuous flowsheet with protein A would result in the lowest environmental burden. When the economic, environmental, and operational criteria were reconciled using multi-criteria decision-making analysis, the continuous protein A-based flowsheet was found to be the most favorable. A target analysis highlighted the need for process improvements in the following parameters to reduce the manufacturing costs of the continuous column-free capture options below that of protein A: the perfusion volumetric productivity, the harvested cell culture fluid percentage in column-free operations, the column-free step yields along with the implementation of buffer concentrates.</p>","PeriodicalId":8856,"journal":{"name":"Biotechnology Progress","volume":"40 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/btpr.3427","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biotechnology Progress","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/btpr.3427","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Process intensification efforts have renewed interest in the potential of end-to-end continuous manufacture with column-free capture alternatives. This article describes a decisional tool that encompasses mass balance and design equations, process economics, stochastic simulation and multi-criteria decision-making and enables the evaluation of different batch, and continuous flowsheets for monoclonal antibody (mAb) manufacture. The traditional batch process was compared with end-to-end continuous bioprocesses with either protein A capture or column-free capture employing aqueous two-phase extraction or precipitation from economic, environmental, and robustness perspectives. The cost of goods analysis predicted that continuous flowsheets could offer substantial cost savings (~20%–40%) over the batch process at low and medium annual commercial demands (100–500 kg); however, at tonnage demands they resulted in either comparable or higher costs. Comparing the continuous options, the continuous flowsheets with protein A or precipitation yielded similar COG/g values, while aqueous two-phase extraction presented higher costs. The analysis of overall process mass intensities accounting for water and consumables suggested that the continuous flowsheet with protein A would result in the lowest environmental burden. When the economic, environmental, and operational criteria were reconciled using multi-criteria decision-making analysis, the continuous protein A-based flowsheet was found to be the most favorable. A target analysis highlighted the need for process improvements in the following parameters to reduce the manufacturing costs of the continuous column-free capture options below that of protein A: the perfusion volumetric productivity, the harvested cell culture fluid percentage in column-free operations, the column-free step yields along with the implementation of buffer concentrates.
工艺强化工作重新激发了人们对采用无色谱柱捕获替代技术进行端到端连续生产的潜力的兴趣。本文介绍了一种决策工具,该工具包含质量平衡和设计方程、工艺经济学、随机模拟和多标准决策,可对单克隆抗体(mAb)生产的不同批次和连续流程进行评估。从经济、环境和稳健性的角度,比较了传统的间歇式工艺和端到端的连续式生物工艺,前者采用蛋白 A 捕捉法,后者则采用水性两相萃取或沉淀的无柱捕获法。根据商品成本分析预测,在中低年商业需求量(100-500 千克)条件下,连续式工艺流程比间歇式工艺流程可节省大量成本(约 20%-40%);但在吨位需求条件下,其成本与间歇式工艺流程相当或更高。在对连续式方案进行比较时,采用蛋白 A 或沉淀法的连续式流程图的 COG/g 值相近,而采用水基两相萃取法的成本较高。对水和消耗品的总体工艺质量强度的分析表明,使用蛋白质 A 的连续流程会带来最低的环境负担。当使用多标准决策分析来协调经济、环境和操作标准时,发现基于蛋白质 A 的连续流程图最为有利。目标分析突出表明,需要对以下参数进行工艺改进,以将连续无柱捕获方案的生产成本降至低于蛋白 A 方案的成本:灌流容积生产率、无柱操作中收获的细胞培养液百分比、无柱步骤产量以及缓冲浓缩物的使用。
期刊介绍:
Biotechnology Progress , an official, bimonthly publication of the American Institute of Chemical Engineers and its technological community, the Society for Biological Engineering, features peer-reviewed research articles, reviews, and descriptions of emerging techniques for the development and design of new processes, products, and devices for the biotechnology, biopharmaceutical and bioprocess industries.
Widespread interest includes application of biological and engineering principles in fields such as applied cellular physiology and metabolic engineering, biocatalysis and bioreactor design, bioseparations and downstream processing, cell culture and tissue engineering, biosensors and process control, bioinformatics and systems biology, biomaterials and artificial organs, stem cell biology and genetics, and plant biology and food science. Manuscripts concerning the design of related processes, products, or devices are also encouraged. Four types of manuscripts are printed in the Journal: Research Papers, Topical or Review Papers, Letters to the Editor, and R & D Notes.