Comparison of modified quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment models as triage tools for febrile patients.

IF 1.9 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Clinical and Experimental Emergency Medicine Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-29 DOI:10.15441/ceem.23.125
Dong-Young Lee, Seung Ryu, So-Young Jeon, Jung-Soo Park, Yeon-Ho You, Won-Joon Jeong, Yong-Chul Cho, Hong-Joon Ahn, Chang-Shin Kang, Se-Kwang Oh
{"title":"Comparison of modified quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment models as triage tools for febrile patients.","authors":"Dong-Young Lee, Seung Ryu, So-Young Jeon, Jung-Soo Park, Yeon-Ho You, Won-Joon Jeong, Yong-Chul Cho, Hong-Joon Ahn, Chang-Shin Kang, Se-Kwang Oh","doi":"10.15441/ceem.23.125","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Effective triage of febrile patients in the emergency department is crucial during times of overcrowding to prioritize care and allocate resources, especially during pandemics. However, available triage tools often require laboratory data and lack accuracy. We aimed to develop a simple and accurate triage tool for febrile patients by modifying the quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) score.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed data from 7,303 febrile patients and created modified versions of qSOFA using factors identified through multivariable analysis. The performance of these modified qSOFAs in predicting in-hospital mortality and intensive care unit (ICU) admission was compared using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Through multivariable analysis, the identified factors were age (\"A\" factor), male sex (\"M\" factor), oxygen saturation measured by pulse oximetry (SpO2; \"S\" factor), and lactate level (\"L\" factor). The AUROCs of ASqSOFA (in-hospital mortality: 0.812 [95% confidence interval, 0.789-0.835]; ICU admission: 0.794 [95% confidence interval, 0.771-0.817]) were simple and not inferior to those of other more complex models (e.g., ASMqSOFA, ASLqSOFA, and ASMLqSOFA). ASqSOFA also displayed significantly higher AUROC than other triage scales, such as the Modified Early Warning Score and Korean Triage and Acuity Scale. The optimal cutoff score of ASqSOFA for the outcome was 2, and the score for redistribution to a lower level emergency department was 0.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We demonstrated that ASqSOFA can be employed as a simple and efficient triage tool for emergency febrile patients to aid in resource distribution during overcrowding. It also may be applicable in prehospital settings for febrile patient triage.</p>","PeriodicalId":10325,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Experimental Emergency Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"286-294"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11467452/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Experimental Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15441/ceem.23.125","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Effective triage of febrile patients in the emergency department is crucial during times of overcrowding to prioritize care and allocate resources, especially during pandemics. However, available triage tools often require laboratory data and lack accuracy. We aimed to develop a simple and accurate triage tool for febrile patients by modifying the quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) score.

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed data from 7,303 febrile patients and created modified versions of qSOFA using factors identified through multivariable analysis. The performance of these modified qSOFAs in predicting in-hospital mortality and intensive care unit (ICU) admission was compared using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC).

Results: Through multivariable analysis, the identified factors were age ("A" factor), male sex ("M" factor), oxygen saturation measured by pulse oximetry (SpO2; "S" factor), and lactate level ("L" factor). The AUROCs of ASqSOFA (in-hospital mortality: 0.812 [95% confidence interval, 0.789-0.835]; ICU admission: 0.794 [95% confidence interval, 0.771-0.817]) were simple and not inferior to those of other more complex models (e.g., ASMqSOFA, ASLqSOFA, and ASMLqSOFA). ASqSOFA also displayed significantly higher AUROC than other triage scales, such as the Modified Early Warning Score and Korean Triage and Acuity Scale. The optimal cutoff score of ASqSOFA for the outcome was 2, and the score for redistribution to a lower level emergency department was 0.

Conclusion: We demonstrated that ASqSOFA can be employed as a simple and efficient triage tool for emergency febrile patients to aid in resource distribution during overcrowding. It also may be applicable in prehospital settings for febrile patient triage.

将改良的快速器官功能衰竭顺序评估模型作为发热病人的分诊工具进行比较。
目的:在急诊科人满为患时,有效地分流发热病人对于确定护理的优先次序和分配资源至关重要,尤其是在大流行病期间。然而,现有的分诊工具往往需要实验室数据,缺乏准确性。我们的目标是通过修改 qSOFA 评分,为发热患者开发一种简单而准确的分诊工具:我们回顾性分析了 7303 名发热患者的数据,并利用多变量分析确定的因素创建了修改版 qSOFA。使用接收者操作特征曲线下面积(AUROC)比较了这些修正版 qSOFA 在预测住院死亡率和重症监护病房(ICU)入院率方面的表现:通过多变量分析,确定的因素包括年龄(A)、男性(M)、SpO2(S)和乳酸水平(L)。ASqSOFA的AUROCs(院内死亡率:0.812;95% CI:0.789-0.835;ICU入院率:0.794;95% CI:0.771-0.817),包括年龄和SpO2与qSOFA,是简单的,并不比其他更复杂的模型(如ASMqSOFA、ASLqSOFA和ASMLqSOFA)差。ASqSOFA 的 AUROC 也明显高于其他分诊量表,如改良早期预警评分和韩国分诊与敏锐度量表。ASqSOFA 结果的最佳临界值为 2 分,而重新分配到下一级急诊科的分数为 0.结论:我们证明,ASqSOFA 可作为一种简单有效的急诊发热患者分诊工具,在人满为患时帮助资源分配。它也可用于院前发热病人的分流。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
10.50%
发文量
59
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信