Qianru Guo, Xin Yao, Bo Yang, Lisha Qi, Frank Wang, Yuhong Guo, Yanxue Liu, Zi Cao, Yalei Wang, Jinpeng Wang, Lingmei Li, Qiujuan Huang, Changxu Liu, Tongyuan Qu, Wei Zhao, Danyang Ren, Manlin Yang, Chenhui Yan, Bin Meng, Cheng Wang, Wenfeng Cao
{"title":"Eosinophilic Solid and Cystic Renal Cell Carcinoma: Morphologic and Immunohistochemical Study of 18 Cases and Review of the Literature.","authors":"Qianru Guo, Xin Yao, Bo Yang, Lisha Qi, Frank Wang, Yuhong Guo, Yanxue Liu, Zi Cao, Yalei Wang, Jinpeng Wang, Lingmei Li, Qiujuan Huang, Changxu Liu, Tongyuan Qu, Wei Zhao, Danyang Ren, Manlin Yang, Chenhui Yan, Bin Meng, Cheng Wang, Wenfeng Cao","doi":"10.5858/arpa.2023-0122-OA","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context.—: </strong>Eosinophilic solid and cystic renal cell carcinoma is now defined in the 5th edition of the 2022 World Health Organization classification of urogenital tumors.</p><p><strong>Objective.—: </strong>To perform morphologic, immunohistochemical, and preliminary genetic studies about this new entity in China for the purpose of understanding it better.</p><p><strong>Design.—: </strong>The study includes 18 patients from a regional tertiary oncology center in northern China (Tianjin, China). We investigated the clinical and immunohistochemical features of these cases.</p><p><strong>Results.—: </strong>The mean age of patients was 49.6 years, and the male to female ratio was 11:7. Macroscopically, 1 case had the classic cystic and solid appearance, whereas the others appeared purely solid. Microscopically, all 18 tumors shared a similar solid and focal macrocystic or microcystic growth pattern, and the cells were characterized by voluminous and eosinophilic cytoplasm, along with coarse amphophilic stippling. Immunohistochemically, most of the tumors had a predominant cytokeratin (CK) 20-positive feature, ranging from focal cytoplasmic staining to diffuse membranous accentuation. Initially, we separated these cases into different immunohistochemical phenotypes. Group 1 (7 of 18; 38.5%) was characterized by positive phospho-4EBP1 and phospho-S6, which can imply hyperactive mechanistic target of rapamycin complex 1 (mTORC1) signaling. Group 2 (4 of 18; 23%) was negative for NF2, probably implying a germline mutation of NF2. Group 3 (7 of 18; 38.5%) consisted of the remaining cases. One case had metastatic spread and exhibited an aggressive clinical course, and we detected cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 2A (CDKN2A) mutation in this case; other patients were alive and without disease progression.</p><p><strong>Conclusions.—: </strong>Our research proposes that eosinophilic solid and cystic renal cell carcinoma exhibits prototypical pathologic features with CK20 positivity and has aggressive potential.</p>","PeriodicalId":93883,"journal":{"name":"Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5858/arpa.2023-0122-OA","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Context.—: Eosinophilic solid and cystic renal cell carcinoma is now defined in the 5th edition of the 2022 World Health Organization classification of urogenital tumors.
Objective.—: To perform morphologic, immunohistochemical, and preliminary genetic studies about this new entity in China for the purpose of understanding it better.
Design.—: The study includes 18 patients from a regional tertiary oncology center in northern China (Tianjin, China). We investigated the clinical and immunohistochemical features of these cases.
Results.—: The mean age of patients was 49.6 years, and the male to female ratio was 11:7. Macroscopically, 1 case had the classic cystic and solid appearance, whereas the others appeared purely solid. Microscopically, all 18 tumors shared a similar solid and focal macrocystic or microcystic growth pattern, and the cells were characterized by voluminous and eosinophilic cytoplasm, along with coarse amphophilic stippling. Immunohistochemically, most of the tumors had a predominant cytokeratin (CK) 20-positive feature, ranging from focal cytoplasmic staining to diffuse membranous accentuation. Initially, we separated these cases into different immunohistochemical phenotypes. Group 1 (7 of 18; 38.5%) was characterized by positive phospho-4EBP1 and phospho-S6, which can imply hyperactive mechanistic target of rapamycin complex 1 (mTORC1) signaling. Group 2 (4 of 18; 23%) was negative for NF2, probably implying a germline mutation of NF2. Group 3 (7 of 18; 38.5%) consisted of the remaining cases. One case had metastatic spread and exhibited an aggressive clinical course, and we detected cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 2A (CDKN2A) mutation in this case; other patients were alive and without disease progression.
Conclusions.—: Our research proposes that eosinophilic solid and cystic renal cell carcinoma exhibits prototypical pathologic features with CK20 positivity and has aggressive potential.
嗜酸性实性和囊性肾细胞癌:18 例病例的形态学和免疫组化研究及文献综述》(Eosinophilic Solid and Cystic Renal Cell Carcinoma: Morphologic and Immunohistochemical Study of 18 Cases and Review of the Literature.