Implementation and Evaluation of Adverse Childhood Experiences Screening in Pediatrics and Obstetrics Settings.

Q2 Social Sciences
The Permanente journal Pub Date : 2024-03-15 Epub Date: 2024-01-29 DOI:10.7812/TPP/23.099
Carey R Watson, Kelly C Young-Wolff, Sonya Negriff, Kelly Dumke, Mercie DiGangi
{"title":"Implementation and Evaluation of Adverse Childhood Experiences Screening in Pediatrics and Obstetrics Settings.","authors":"Carey R Watson, Kelly C Young-Wolff, Sonya Negriff, Kelly Dumke, Mercie DiGangi","doi":"10.7812/TPP/23.099","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Screening for adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) in prenatal and pediatric populations is recommended by the California ACEs Aware initiative and is a promising practice to interrupt ACEs in children and mitigate ACEs-related health complications in children and families. Yet, integrating ACEs screening into clinical practice poses several challenges.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this report was to evaluate the Kaiser Permanente Northern California and Kaiser Permanente Southern California pilots and implementation of ACEs screening into routine prenatal (Kaiser Permanente Northern California) and pediatric (Kaiser Permanente Southern California) care.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>These pilots were evaluated and compared to identify common challenges to implementation and offer promising practices for negotiating these challenges. Evaluation methods included feedback from staff, clinicians, and patients, as well as comparisons of methods to overcome various barriers to screening implementation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Implementing ACEs screening, like implementation of any new component of clinical care, takes careful planning, education, creation of content and workflows, and continuous integration of feedback from both patients and staff.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This evaluation can serve as support for care teams who are considering implementing ACEs screening or who are already screening for ACEs. More research is needed regarding the relationship between ACEs and preventable and treatable health outcomes to improve health for patients and their families.</p>","PeriodicalId":23037,"journal":{"name":"The Permanente journal","volume":" ","pages":"180-187"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10940230/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Permanente journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7812/TPP/23.099","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Screening for adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) in prenatal and pediatric populations is recommended by the California ACEs Aware initiative and is a promising practice to interrupt ACEs in children and mitigate ACEs-related health complications in children and families. Yet, integrating ACEs screening into clinical practice poses several challenges.

Objective: The objective of this report was to evaluate the Kaiser Permanente Northern California and Kaiser Permanente Southern California pilots and implementation of ACEs screening into routine prenatal (Kaiser Permanente Northern California) and pediatric (Kaiser Permanente Southern California) care.

Materials and methods: These pilots were evaluated and compared to identify common challenges to implementation and offer promising practices for negotiating these challenges. Evaluation methods included feedback from staff, clinicians, and patients, as well as comparisons of methods to overcome various barriers to screening implementation.

Results: Implementing ACEs screening, like implementation of any new component of clinical care, takes careful planning, education, creation of content and workflows, and continuous integration of feedback from both patients and staff.

Conclusion: This evaluation can serve as support for care teams who are considering implementing ACEs screening or who are already screening for ACEs. More research is needed regarding the relationship between ACEs and preventable and treatable health outcomes to improve health for patients and their families.

在儿科和产科实施和评估童年不良经历筛查。
背景:在产前和儿科人群中进行不良童年经历(ACEs)筛查是加州 ACEs 意识倡议所推荐的,也是中断儿童 ACEs 和减轻儿童及家庭 ACEs 相关健康并发症的一种有前途的做法。然而,将 ACEs 筛查纳入临床实践却面临着一些挑战:本报告旨在评估北加州凯泽医疗集团和南加州凯泽医疗集团的试点项目,以及将 ACEs 筛查纳入常规产前(北加州凯泽医疗集团)和儿科(南加州凯泽医疗集团)护理的实施情况:对这些试点项目进行了评估和比较,以确定实施过程中面临的共同挑战,并提供应对这些挑战的可行方法。评估方法包括员工、临床医生和患者的反馈,以及对克服筛查实施过程中各种障碍的方法进行比较:结果:实施 ACE 筛选与实施临床护理的任何新内容一样,需要精心策划、教育、创建内容和工作流程,并不断整合患者和员工的反馈意见:这项评估可以为正在考虑实施 ACEs 筛查或已经在进行 ACEs 筛查的护理团队提供支持。需要对 ACE 与可预防和可治疗的健康结果之间的关系进行更多研究,以改善患者及其家人的健康。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
The Permanente journal
The Permanente journal Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
86
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信