Trajectories of Recovery Following Traumatic Brain Injury Among Older Medicare Beneficiaries.

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Journal of neurotrauma Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-19 DOI:10.1089/neu.2023.0502
Jennifer S Albrecht, Chixiang Chen, Jason R Falvey
{"title":"Trajectories of Recovery Following Traumatic Brain Injury Among Older Medicare Beneficiaries.","authors":"Jennifer S Albrecht, Chixiang Chen, Jason R Falvey","doi":"10.1089/neu.2023.0502","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>It is well-known that older adults have poorer recovery following traumatic brain injury (TBI) relative to younger adults with similar injury severity. However, most older adults do recover well from TBI. Identifying those at increased risk of poor recovery could inform appropriate management pathways, facilitate discussions about palliative care or unmet needs, and permit targeted intervention to optimize quality of life or recovery. We sought to explore heterogeneity in recovery from TBI among older adults as measured by home time per month, a patient-centered metric defined as time spent at home and not in a hospital, urgent care, or other facility. Using data obtained from Medicare administrative claims data for years 2010-2018, group-based trajectory modeling was employed to identify unique trajectories of recovery among a sample of United States adults age 65 and older who were hospitalized with TBI. We next determined which patient-level characteristics discriminated poor from favorable recovery using logistic regression. Among 20,350 beneficiaries, four unique trajectories were identified: poor recovery (<i>n</i> = 1929; 9.5%), improving recovery (<i>n</i> = 2,793; 13.7%), good recovery (<i>n</i> = 13,512; 66.4%), and declining recovery (<i>n</i> = 2116; 10.4%). The strongest predictors of membership in the poor relative to the good recovery trajectory group were diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRD; odd ratio [OR] 2.42; 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.16, 2.72) and dual eligibility for Medicaid, a proxy for economic vulnerability (OR 5.13; 95% CI 4.59, 5.74). TBI severity was not associated with recovery trajectories. In conclusion, this study identified four unique trajectories of recovery over one year following TBI among older adults. Two-thirds of older adults hospitalized with TBI returned to the community and stayed there. Recovery of monthly home time was complete for most by 3 months post injury. An important sub-group comprising 10% of patients who did not return home was characterized primarily by eligibility for Medicaid and diagnosis of ADRD. Future studies should seek to further characterize and investigate identified recovery groups to inform management and development of interventions to improve recovery.</p>","PeriodicalId":16512,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurotrauma","volume":" ","pages":"2377-2384"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurotrauma","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/neu.2023.0502","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

It is well-known that older adults have poorer recovery following traumatic brain injury (TBI) relative to younger adults with similar injury severity. However, most older adults do recover well from TBI. Identifying those at increased risk of poor recovery could inform appropriate management pathways, facilitate discussions about palliative care or unmet needs, and permit targeted intervention to optimize quality of life or recovery. We sought to explore heterogeneity in recovery from TBI among older adults as measured by home time per month, a patient-centered metric defined as time spent at home and not in a hospital, urgent care, or other facility. Using data obtained from Medicare administrative claims data for years 2010-2018, group-based trajectory modeling was employed to identify unique trajectories of recovery among a sample of United States adults age 65 and older who were hospitalized with TBI. We next determined which patient-level characteristics discriminated poor from favorable recovery using logistic regression. Among 20,350 beneficiaries, four unique trajectories were identified: poor recovery (n = 1929; 9.5%), improving recovery (n = 2,793; 13.7%), good recovery (n = 13,512; 66.4%), and declining recovery (n = 2116; 10.4%). The strongest predictors of membership in the poor relative to the good recovery trajectory group were diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRD; odd ratio [OR] 2.42; 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.16, 2.72) and dual eligibility for Medicaid, a proxy for economic vulnerability (OR 5.13; 95% CI 4.59, 5.74). TBI severity was not associated with recovery trajectories. In conclusion, this study identified four unique trajectories of recovery over one year following TBI among older adults. Two-thirds of older adults hospitalized with TBI returned to the community and stayed there. Recovery of monthly home time was complete for most by 3 months post injury. An important sub-group comprising 10% of patients who did not return home was characterized primarily by eligibility for Medicaid and diagnosis of ADRD. Future studies should seek to further characterize and investigate identified recovery groups to inform management and development of interventions to improve recovery.

老年医疗保险受益人创伤性脑损伤后的康复轨迹。
众所周知,与受伤严重程度相似的年轻人相比,老年人在创伤性脑损伤(TBI)后的恢复情况较差。不过,大多数老年人在创伤性脑损伤后恢复良好。识别那些恢复不良风险较高的人群可以为适当的管理途径提供信息,促进有关姑息治疗或未满足需求的讨论,并允许进行有针对性的干预,以优化生活质量或恢复。我们试图探究老年人从创伤性脑损伤中恢复的异质性,以每月在家时间来衡量,这是一个以患者为中心的指标,定义为在家而不是在医院、紧急护理或其他设施中度过的时间。利用从 2010-2018 年医疗保险行政报销数据中获得的数据,我们采用了基于群体的轨迹建模方法,在因创伤性脑损伤住院的 65 岁及以上美国成年人样本中识别出独特的康复轨迹。接下来,我们利用逻辑回归确定了哪些患者层面的特征可以区分恢复情况较差和恢复情况良好的患者。在 20,350 名受益人中,我们发现了四种独特的康复轨迹:康复不佳(n=1,929 (9.5%))、康复改善(n=2,793 (13.7%))、康复良好(n=13,512 (66.4%))和康复下降(n=2,116 (10.4%))。相对于良好康复轨迹组,诊断出阿尔茨海默病和相关痴呆症(奇数比 (OR) 2.42; 95% 置信区间 (CI) 2.16, 2.72)和双重医疗补助资格(代表经济脆弱性)(OR 5.13; 95% CI 4.59, 5.74)是预测不良康复轨迹组成员的最有力因素。创伤性脑损伤的严重程度与康复轨迹无关。总之,本研究发现了老年人创伤性脑损伤后一年内的四种独特的康复轨迹。三分之二因创伤性脑损伤住院的老年人回到了社区并留在了那里。大多数人在受伤后三个月就能完全恢复每月在家的时间。有一个重要的亚群,其中有 10% 的患者没有重返家园,他们的主要特征是符合医疗补助资格和被诊断为 ADRD。未来的研究应进一步分析和调查已确定的康复群体,为管理和干预措施的开发提供信息,以改善康复情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of neurotrauma
Journal of neurotrauma 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
7.10%
发文量
233
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Neurotrauma is the flagship, peer-reviewed publication for reporting on the latest advances in both the clinical and laboratory investigation of traumatic brain and spinal cord injury. The Journal focuses on the basic pathobiology of injury to the central nervous system, while considering preclinical and clinical trials targeted at improving both the early management and long-term care and recovery of traumatically injured patients. This is the essential journal publishing cutting-edge basic and translational research in traumatically injured human and animal studies, with emphasis on neurodegenerative disease research linked to CNS trauma.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信