Leveraging the holistic benefits of biosimilars in Europe - part 2: how payers can safeguard the future of a healthy biosimilar market environment.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Jorge Mestre-Ferrandiz, Marcin Czech, Josef S Smolen, Paul Cornes, Matti S Aapro, Silvio Danese, Stephen Deitch, Hannah Tyldsley, Will Foster, Pooja Shah, Mark Latymer, Arnold G Vulto
{"title":"Leveraging the holistic benefits of biosimilars in Europe - part 2: how payers can safeguard the future of a healthy biosimilar market environment.","authors":"Jorge Mestre-Ferrandiz, Marcin Czech, Josef S Smolen, Paul Cornes, Matti S Aapro, Silvio Danese, Stephen Deitch, Hannah Tyldsley, Will Foster, Pooja Shah, Mark Latymer, Arnold G Vulto","doi":"10.1080/14737167.2024.2310684","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Biosimilars have improved access to biologic medicines; however, historical thinking may jeopardize the viability of future markets.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>An expert panel of eight diverse European stakeholders provided insights about rethinking biosimilars and cost-savings, reducing patient access inequalities, increasing inter-market equity, and improving education. The insights reported here (Part 2) follow a study that provides perspectives on leveraging the holistic benefits of biosimilars for market sustainability based on independent survey results and telephone interviews of stakeholders from diverse biosimilar markets (Part 1). Directional recommendations are provided for payers.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>The panel's market maturity framework for biosimilars has three stages: 'Invest,' 'Expand' and 'Harvest.' Across market stages, re-thinking the benefits of biosimilars beyond cost-savings, considering earlier or expanded access/new indications, product innovations, and re-investment of biosimilar-generated cost-savings should be communicated to stakeholders to promote further engagement. During 'Expand' and 'Harvest' stages, development of efficient, forward-looking procurement systems and mechanisms that drive uptake and stabilize competition between manufacturers are key. Future biosimilars will target various therapy areas beyond those targeted by existing biosimilars. To ensure a healthy, accessible future market, stakeholders must align their objectives, communicate, collaborate, and coordinate via education, incentivization, and procurement, to maximize the totality of benefits.</p>","PeriodicalId":12244,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14737167.2024.2310684","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Biosimilars have improved access to biologic medicines; however, historical thinking may jeopardize the viability of future markets.

Areas covered: An expert panel of eight diverse European stakeholders provided insights about rethinking biosimilars and cost-savings, reducing patient access inequalities, increasing inter-market equity, and improving education. The insights reported here (Part 2) follow a study that provides perspectives on leveraging the holistic benefits of biosimilars for market sustainability based on independent survey results and telephone interviews of stakeholders from diverse biosimilar markets (Part 1). Directional recommendations are provided for payers.

Expert opinion: The panel's market maturity framework for biosimilars has three stages: 'Invest,' 'Expand' and 'Harvest.' Across market stages, re-thinking the benefits of biosimilars beyond cost-savings, considering earlier or expanded access/new indications, product innovations, and re-investment of biosimilar-generated cost-savings should be communicated to stakeholders to promote further engagement. During 'Expand' and 'Harvest' stages, development of efficient, forward-looking procurement systems and mechanisms that drive uptake and stabilize competition between manufacturers are key. Future biosimilars will target various therapy areas beyond those targeted by existing biosimilars. To ensure a healthy, accessible future market, stakeholders must align their objectives, communicate, collaborate, and coordinate via education, incentivization, and procurement, to maximize the totality of benefits.

在欧洲充分利用生物仿制药的整体效益--第二部分:付款人如何保障未来健康的生物仿制药市场环境。
简介:生物仿制药改善了生物制药的可及性;然而,历史思维可能会危及未来市场的可行性:由八位不同的欧洲利益相关者组成的专家小组就重新思考生物仿制药和节约成本、减少患者获得药物的不平等、提高市场间的公平性以及改善教育等问题发表了见解。本报告(第 2 部分)的见解是在一项研究的基础上提出的,该研究基于对不同生物仿制药市场利益相关者的独立调查结果和电话访谈(第 1 部分),就如何利用生物仿制药的整体效益促进市场可持续性提出了观点。为支付方提供了方向性建议:专家小组的生物仿制药市场成熟度框架分为三个阶段:投资"、"扩展 "和 "收获"。在各个市场阶段,应与利益相关者沟通,重新思考生物仿制药的益处,而不仅仅是节约成本、考虑提前或扩大使用/新适应症、产品创新以及对生物仿制药产生的成本节约进行再投资,以促进进一步的参与。在 "扩大 "和 "收获 "阶段,开发高效、具有前瞻性的采购系统和机制是关键所在,这些系统和机制可促进生物仿制药的吸收并稳定制造商之间的竞争。未来的生物仿制药将针对现有生物仿制药之外的各种治疗领域。为确保未来市场的健康和可及性,各利益相关方必须通过教育、激励和采购来统一目标、沟通、合作和协调,以实现整体利益的最大化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research
Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
4.30%
发文量
68
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research (ISSN 1473-7167) provides expert reviews on cost-benefit and pharmacoeconomic issues relating to the clinical use of drugs and therapeutic approaches. Coverage includes pharmacoeconomics and quality-of-life research, therapeutic outcomes, evidence-based medicine and cost-benefit research. All articles are subject to rigorous peer-review. The journal adopts the unique Expert Review article format, offering a complete overview of current thinking in a key technology area, research or clinical practice, augmented by the following sections: Expert Opinion – a personal view of the data presented in the article, a discussion on the developments that are likely to be important in the future, and the avenues of research likely to become exciting as further studies yield more detailed results Article Highlights – an executive summary of the author’s most critical points.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信