Risk Factors of Failure in 228 Periprosthetic Distal Femur Fractures: A Multicenter Study.

IF 1.6 3区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Marshall James Fairres, Dane Brodke, Nathan O'Hara, Sai Devana, Adolfo Hernandez, Cynthia Burke, Jayesh Gupta, Natasha McKibben, Robert O'Toole, John Morellato, Hunter Gillon, Murphy Walters, Colby Barber, Paul Perdue, Graham Dekeyser, Lillia Steffenson, Lucas Marchand, Loren Black, Zachary Working, Erika Roddy, Ashraf El Naga, Matthew Hogue, Trevor Gulbrandsen, Omar Atassi, Thomas Mitchell, Stephen Shymon, Christopher Lee
{"title":"Risk Factors of Failure in 228 Periprosthetic Distal Femur Fractures: A Multicenter Study.","authors":"Marshall James Fairres, Dane Brodke, Nathan O'Hara, Sai Devana, Adolfo Hernandez, Cynthia Burke, Jayesh Gupta, Natasha McKibben, Robert O'Toole, John Morellato, Hunter Gillon, Murphy Walters, Colby Barber, Paul Perdue, Graham Dekeyser, Lillia Steffenson, Lucas Marchand, Loren Black, Zachary Working, Erika Roddy, Ashraf El Naga, Matthew Hogue, Trevor Gulbrandsen, Omar Atassi, Thomas Mitchell, Stephen Shymon, Christopher Lee","doi":"10.1097/BOT.0000000000002779","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To identify risk factors of reoperation to promote union or to address deep surgical-site infection (DSSI) in periprosthetic distal femur fractures treated with lateral distal femoral locking plates (LDFLPs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong></p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Multicenter retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Ten level-I trauma centers.</p><p><strong>Patient selection criteria: </strong>Patients with Orthopaedic Trauma Association/Association of Osteosynthesis (OTA/AO) 33A or 33C periprosthetic distal femur fractures who underwent surgical fixation between January 2012 and December 2019 exclusively using LDFLPs were eligible for inclusion. Patients with pathologic fractures or with follow-up less than 3 months without an outcome event (unplanned reoperation to promote union or for deep surgical infection) before this time point were excluded. Fracture fixation constructs used medial plates, intramedullary nails, or hybrid fixation constructs were excluded from analysis.</p><p><strong>Outcome measures and comparisons: </strong>To examine the influence of patient demographics, injury characteristics, and features of the fracture fixation construct on the occurrence of unplanned reoperation to promote union or to address a DSSI.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was an 8.3% rate (19/228) of unplanned reoperation to promote union. Predictive factors for the need for reoperation to promote union included increasing body mass index (odds ratio [OR] = 1.09; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.02-1.16; P = 0.01), increasing number of screws in the distal fracture segment (OR = 1.73; 95% CI: 1.06-2.95; P = 0.03), and decreasing proportion of proximal segment screws that are locking (OR = 0.17; 95% CI: 0.03-0.70; P = 0.02) There was a 4.8% rate (11/228) of reoperation to address DSSI. There were no statistically significant predictive factors identified as risk factors of the need for reoperation to address DSSI ( P > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>8.3% of periprosthetic distal femur fractures treated at 10 centers with LDFLPs underwent unplanned reoperation to promote union. Increasing patient body mass index and increasing number of screws in the distal fracture segment were found to be predictive factors, whereas increased locking screws in the proximal segment were found to be protective. 4.8% of patients in this cohort underwent reoperation to address DSSI.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.</p>","PeriodicalId":16644,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma","volume":" ","pages":"273-278"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0000000000002779","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To identify risk factors of reoperation to promote union or to address deep surgical-site infection (DSSI) in periprosthetic distal femur fractures treated with lateral distal femoral locking plates (LDFLPs).

Methods:

Design: Multicenter retrospective cohort study.

Setting: Ten level-I trauma centers.

Patient selection criteria: Patients with Orthopaedic Trauma Association/Association of Osteosynthesis (OTA/AO) 33A or 33C periprosthetic distal femur fractures who underwent surgical fixation between January 2012 and December 2019 exclusively using LDFLPs were eligible for inclusion. Patients with pathologic fractures or with follow-up less than 3 months without an outcome event (unplanned reoperation to promote union or for deep surgical infection) before this time point were excluded. Fracture fixation constructs used medial plates, intramedullary nails, or hybrid fixation constructs were excluded from analysis.

Outcome measures and comparisons: To examine the influence of patient demographics, injury characteristics, and features of the fracture fixation construct on the occurrence of unplanned reoperation to promote union or to address a DSSI.

Results: There was an 8.3% rate (19/228) of unplanned reoperation to promote union. Predictive factors for the need for reoperation to promote union included increasing body mass index (odds ratio [OR] = 1.09; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.02-1.16; P = 0.01), increasing number of screws in the distal fracture segment (OR = 1.73; 95% CI: 1.06-2.95; P = 0.03), and decreasing proportion of proximal segment screws that are locking (OR = 0.17; 95% CI: 0.03-0.70; P = 0.02) There was a 4.8% rate (11/228) of reoperation to address DSSI. There were no statistically significant predictive factors identified as risk factors of the need for reoperation to address DSSI ( P > 0.05).

Conclusions: 8.3% of periprosthetic distal femur fractures treated at 10 centers with LDFLPs underwent unplanned reoperation to promote union. Increasing patient body mass index and increasing number of screws in the distal fracture segment were found to be predictive factors, whereas increased locking screws in the proximal segment were found to be protective. 4.8% of patients in this cohort underwent reoperation to address DSSI.

Level of evidence: Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

228 例股骨远端假体周围骨折失败的风险因素:一项多中心研究。
目的确定使用股骨远端外侧锁定钢板(LDFLP)治疗的股骨远端假体周围骨折(PPDF)患者为促进愈合或解决深部手术部位感染(DSSI)而再次手术的风险因素:方法:设计:多中心回顾性队列研究:十个一级创伤中心:2012年1月至2019年12月期间完全使用LDFLP进行手术固定的OTA/AO 33A或33C PPDFs PPDFs患者符合纳入条件。排除病理骨折患者,或在此时间点之前随访不足 3 个月且未发生结果事件(为促进愈合或深部手术感染而计划外再次手术)的患者。使用内侧钢板、髓内钉或混合固定结构的骨折固定结构不在分析之列:研究患者人口统计学特征、损伤特征和骨折固定结构特征对为促进愈合或解决DSSI而进行非计划再手术的影响:结果:为促进骨折愈合而进行计划外再手术的比例为 8.3%(19/228)。为促进骨结合而需要再次手术的预测因素包括体重指数(BMI)增加(几率比 [OR] =1.09;95% 置信区间 [CI]:1.02-1.16;P=0.01)、远端骨折段螺钉数量增加(OR =1.73 95% CI: 1.06-2.95; p=0.03),近端节段螺钉锁定比例下降(OR = 0.17; 95% CI: 0.03-0.70; p=0.02)。没有发现具有统计学意义的预测因素可作为需要再次手术以解决DSSI的风险因素(P>0.05):结论:在10个中心使用股骨远端外侧锁定钢板治疗的股骨远端假体周围骨折中,有8.3%的患者接受了非计划性再手术以促进骨结合。研究发现,患者体重指数(BMI)的增加和骨折远端螺钉数量的增加是预测因素,而近端锁定螺钉数量的增加则具有保护作用。该队列中有4.8%的患者因深部手术部位感染而接受了再次手术:证据等级:三级。有关证据等级的完整描述,请参阅 "作者须知"。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma
Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma 医学-运动科学
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
8.70%
发文量
396
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma is devoted exclusively to the diagnosis and management of hard and soft tissue trauma, including injuries to bone, muscle, ligament, and tendons, as well as spinal cord injuries. Under the guidance of a distinguished international board of editors, the journal provides the most current information on diagnostic techniques, new and improved surgical instruments and procedures, surgical implants and prosthetic devices, bioplastics and biometals; and physical therapy and rehabilitation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信