Comparative evaluation of intraoperative dexmedetomidine versus lidocaine for reducing postoperative cognitive decline in the elderly: a prospective randomized controlled trial.

IF 1.6 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Mahendran T Kurup, Soumya Sarkar, Rohit Verma, Renu Bhatia, Puneet Khanna, Souvik Maitra, Rahul Anand, Bikash R Ray, Akhil K Singh, K K Deepak
{"title":"Comparative evaluation of intraoperative dexmedetomidine versus lidocaine for reducing postoperative cognitive decline in the elderly: a prospective randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Mahendran T Kurup, Soumya Sarkar, Rohit Verma, Renu Bhatia, Puneet Khanna, Souvik Maitra, Rahul Anand, Bikash R Ray, Akhil K Singh, K K Deepak","doi":"10.5114/ait.2023.134251","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Neuroinflammation, neuronal cytotoxicity, and apoptosis due to exposure to anaesthetic agents are often implicated in postoperative cognitive dysfunction (POCD). Lidocaine and dexmedetomidine have been shown to suppress the neuron-specific markers of inflammation, and we aimed to compare their neuroprotective efficacy in elderly patients.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>This prospective randomized control study compared the incidence of POCD in ASA I/II patients aged 60 to 80 years without any history of substance abuse or any disorder affecting cognition. Dexmedetomidine and lidocaine were administered intraoperatively, and their effects on POCD were correlated with serum levels of IL-1, IL-6, TNF-a, amyloid-β, and S100 on postoperative day 3. POCD was assessed by the Stroop test, Trail making test-B, Porteus Maze test, Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), and Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) on the day before surgery and the third postoperative day, along with blood samples.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Demographic parameters, anaesthesia duration, exposure to anaesthetic gases, intraoperative opioid use, and blood transfusion were similar in the lidocaine ( n = 31) and dexmedetomidine ( n = 29) groups. The incidence of POCD was 29.03% in the lidocaine group and 24.1% in the dexmedetomidine group ( P = 0.77). On postoperative day 3, IL-1 levels increased by 449% with lidocaine and 202% with dexmedetomidine ( P = 0.03). TNF-a, IL-6, and S-100β levels increased similarly in both groups. There was no significant correlation between percentage changes in neuropsychological tests and biomarkers.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There was no significant difference in the incidence of POCD, but dexmedetomidine had a better anti-inflammatory effect in terms of lesser rise of postoperative IL-1 compared to lidocaine.</p>","PeriodicalId":7750,"journal":{"name":"Anaesthesiology intensive therapy","volume":"55 5","pages":"349-357"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10801457/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anaesthesiology intensive therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/ait.2023.134251","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Neuroinflammation, neuronal cytotoxicity, and apoptosis due to exposure to anaesthetic agents are often implicated in postoperative cognitive dysfunction (POCD). Lidocaine and dexmedetomidine have been shown to suppress the neuron-specific markers of inflammation, and we aimed to compare their neuroprotective efficacy in elderly patients.

Material and methods: This prospective randomized control study compared the incidence of POCD in ASA I/II patients aged 60 to 80 years without any history of substance abuse or any disorder affecting cognition. Dexmedetomidine and lidocaine were administered intraoperatively, and their effects on POCD were correlated with serum levels of IL-1, IL-6, TNF-a, amyloid-β, and S100 on postoperative day 3. POCD was assessed by the Stroop test, Trail making test-B, Porteus Maze test, Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), and Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) on the day before surgery and the third postoperative day, along with blood samples.

Results: Demographic parameters, anaesthesia duration, exposure to anaesthetic gases, intraoperative opioid use, and blood transfusion were similar in the lidocaine ( n = 31) and dexmedetomidine ( n = 29) groups. The incidence of POCD was 29.03% in the lidocaine group and 24.1% in the dexmedetomidine group ( P = 0.77). On postoperative day 3, IL-1 levels increased by 449% with lidocaine and 202% with dexmedetomidine ( P = 0.03). TNF-a, IL-6, and S-100β levels increased similarly in both groups. There was no significant correlation between percentage changes in neuropsychological tests and biomarkers.

Conclusions: There was no significant difference in the incidence of POCD, but dexmedetomidine had a better anti-inflammatory effect in terms of lesser rise of postoperative IL-1 compared to lidocaine.

术中右美托咪定与利多卡因在减少老年人术后认知能力下降方面的比较评估:一项前瞻性随机对照试验。
导言:麻醉剂导致的神经炎症、神经元细胞毒性和细胞凋亡往往与术后认知功能障碍(POCD)有关。利多卡因和右美托咪定已被证明可抑制神经元特异性炎症指标,我们旨在比较它们对老年患者神经保护的功效:这项前瞻性随机对照研究比较了年龄在 60 至 80 岁之间、无药物滥用史或任何影响认知障碍的 ASA I/II 患者的 POCD 发生率。术中使用右美托咪定和利多卡因,它们对 POCD 的影响与术后第 3 天血清中 IL-1、IL-6、TNF-a、淀粉样蛋白-β 和 S100 的水平相关。在手术前一天和术后第三天,通过斯特罗普测试、寻路测试-B、波特迷宫测试、迷你精神状态检查(MMSE)和蒙特利尔认知评估(MoCA)以及血液样本对 POCD 进行了评估:利多卡因组(31 人)和右美托咪定组(29 人)的人口统计学参数、麻醉持续时间、麻醉气体暴露、术中阿片类药物使用和输血情况相似。利多卡因组 POCD 发生率为 29.03%,右美托咪定组为 24.1%(P = 0.77)。术后第3天,利多卡因组的IL-1水平增加了449%,右美托咪定组增加了202%(P = 0.03)。两组的 TNF-a、IL-6 和 S-100β 水平增幅相似。神经心理测试和生物标志物的百分比变化之间没有明显的相关性:结论:POCD的发生率没有明显差异,但右美托咪定的抗炎效果更好,术后IL-1的升高低于利多卡因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.90%
发文量
48
审稿时长
25 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信