The Implementation Success of Technology-Based Counseling in Dementia Care: Scoping Review.

IF 5 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
JMIR Aging Pub Date : 2024-01-25 DOI:10.2196/51544
Dorothee Bauernschmidt, Janina Wittmann, Julian Hirt, Gabriele Meyer, Anja Bieber
{"title":"The Implementation Success of Technology-Based Counseling in Dementia Care: Scoping Review.","authors":"Dorothee Bauernschmidt, Janina Wittmann, Julian Hirt, Gabriele Meyer, Anja Bieber","doi":"10.2196/51544","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Implementing technology-based counseling as a complex intervention in dementia care poses challenges such as adaptation to stakeholders' needs and limited resources. While studies have examined the effectiveness of technology-based counseling, its successful implementation remains largely unexplored.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We aimed to review the knowledge about the implementation success of technology-based counseling interventions for people with dementia and their informal caregivers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a scoping review and systematically searched CINAHL, the Cochrane Library including the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and Web of Science Core Collection databases (April 2021) in combination with citation searching and web searching (November 2021). Studies reporting on technology-based counseling interventions for people with dementia or their informal caregivers were included, irrespective of the design. We used the conceptual framework for implementation outcomes to operationalize implementation success and applied the outcomes acceptability, adoption, appropriateness, feasibility, fidelity, implementation cost, penetration, and sustainability as categories to inform data extraction. We identified dimensions within the categories and synthesized results narratively and graphically.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 52 publications reporting on 27 technology-based counseling interventions. The studies were conducted in 9 countries and published between 1993 and 2021. As the design of the included studies varied, the number of participants and the type of data reported varied as well. The intervention programs were heterogeneous and ranged from single counseling interventions (such as helpline services) to counseling as part of a multicomponent program. Telephone, email, videoconferencing, social media (respectively chats), and web-based platforms were used for delivering counseling. We found data on appropriateness for all interventions and data on acceptability for most interventions, describing aspects such as consumer-perceived usefulness and helpfulness of services, as well as satisfaction. Information on the other categories of adoption, feasibility, fidelity, implementation cost, penetration, and sustainability was fragmented.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The scope and depth of information on conceptual categories of the implementation success of technology-based counseling for people with dementia and informal caregivers varied. The data only partially covered the concept of implementation success, which highlights the need for a systematic evaluation accompanying the implementation. The application of theoretical approaches for implementation and adherence to the framework for developing and evaluating complex interventions are required to promote the implementation of complex interventions and to comprehensively assess implementation success.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>PROSPERO CRD42021245473; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=245473.</p>","PeriodicalId":36245,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Aging","volume":"7 ","pages":"e51544"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10853855/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR Aging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/51544","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Implementing technology-based counseling as a complex intervention in dementia care poses challenges such as adaptation to stakeholders' needs and limited resources. While studies have examined the effectiveness of technology-based counseling, its successful implementation remains largely unexplored.

Objective: We aimed to review the knowledge about the implementation success of technology-based counseling interventions for people with dementia and their informal caregivers.

Methods: We conducted a scoping review and systematically searched CINAHL, the Cochrane Library including the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and Web of Science Core Collection databases (April 2021) in combination with citation searching and web searching (November 2021). Studies reporting on technology-based counseling interventions for people with dementia or their informal caregivers were included, irrespective of the design. We used the conceptual framework for implementation outcomes to operationalize implementation success and applied the outcomes acceptability, adoption, appropriateness, feasibility, fidelity, implementation cost, penetration, and sustainability as categories to inform data extraction. We identified dimensions within the categories and synthesized results narratively and graphically.

Results: We included 52 publications reporting on 27 technology-based counseling interventions. The studies were conducted in 9 countries and published between 1993 and 2021. As the design of the included studies varied, the number of participants and the type of data reported varied as well. The intervention programs were heterogeneous and ranged from single counseling interventions (such as helpline services) to counseling as part of a multicomponent program. Telephone, email, videoconferencing, social media (respectively chats), and web-based platforms were used for delivering counseling. We found data on appropriateness for all interventions and data on acceptability for most interventions, describing aspects such as consumer-perceived usefulness and helpfulness of services, as well as satisfaction. Information on the other categories of adoption, feasibility, fidelity, implementation cost, penetration, and sustainability was fragmented.

Conclusions: The scope and depth of information on conceptual categories of the implementation success of technology-based counseling for people with dementia and informal caregivers varied. The data only partially covered the concept of implementation success, which highlights the need for a systematic evaluation accompanying the implementation. The application of theoretical approaches for implementation and adherence to the framework for developing and evaluating complex interventions are required to promote the implementation of complex interventions and to comprehensively assess implementation success.

Trial registration: PROSPERO CRD42021245473; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=245473.

基于技术的痴呆症护理咨询的成功实施:范围审查。
背景:在痴呆症护理中实施以技术为基础的咨询作为一种复杂的干预措施,面临着适应利益相关者的需求和资源有限等挑战。虽然已有研究探讨了基于技术的心理咨询的有效性,但其成功实施在很大程度上仍有待探索:我们旨在回顾有关针对痴呆症患者及其非正规护理人员的科技辅导干预措施成功实施的知识:我们进行了范围界定综述,并结合引文检索和网络检索(2021 年 11 月),系统检索了 CINAHL、Cochrane 图书馆(包括 Cochrane 对照试验中央登记册)、MEDLINE、PsycINFO 和 Web of Science 核心收藏数据库(2021 年 4 月)。无论设计如何,均纳入了针对痴呆症患者或其非正式护理人员的基于技术的咨询干预的研究报告。我们使用实施结果的概念框架来操作实施成功与否,并将结果的可接受性、采用率、适宜性、可行性、忠实性、实施成本、渗透率和可持续性作为类别,为数据提取提供信息。我们确定了这些类别中的各个维度,并以叙述和图表的方式对结果进行了综合:结果:我们共收录了 52 篇出版物,报告了 27 项基于技术的咨询干预措施。这些研究在 9 个国家进行,发表于 1993 年至 2021 年之间。由于所纳入研究的设计各不相同,因此报告的参与者人数和数据类型也各不相同。干预计划多种多样,既有单一的咨询干预(如求助热线服务),也有作为多成分计划一部分的咨询。提供咨询的方式包括电话、电子邮件、视频会议、社交媒体(分别为聊天)和网络平台。我们发现了所有干预措施的适宜性数据和大多数干预措施的可接受性数据,这些数据描述了消费者认为服务有用性和有用性以及满意度等方面。关于采用、可行性、忠实性、实施成本、普及率和可持续性等其他类别的信息则比较零散:结论:针对痴呆症患者和非正规护理人员的科技咨询服务实施成功与否的概念类别信息的范围和深度各不相同。数据仅部分涵盖了实施成功的概念,这凸显了在实施过程中进行系统评估的必要性。要促进复杂干预措施的实施并全面评估实施的成功与否,就必须应用实施的理论方法并遵守复杂干预措施的开发和评估框架:ProCORD42021245473; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=245473.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JMIR Aging
JMIR Aging Social Sciences-Health (social science)
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
4.10%
发文量
71
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信