Moving from research to clinical care: Building therapist capacity to deliver the teen online problem-solving program for acquired brain injuries in adolescence.
Jamie Patronick, Julia Rabin, Brianna Maggard, Aayush M Dubey, Shari L Wade
{"title":"Moving from research to clinical care: Building therapist capacity to deliver the teen online problem-solving program for acquired brain injuries in adolescence.","authors":"Jamie Patronick, Julia Rabin, Brianna Maggard, Aayush M Dubey, Shari L Wade","doi":"10.1037/rep0000537","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To describe the training process for teen online problem solving (TOPS) for acquired brain injury (ABI) in adolescence. We evaluated feedback from training participants and therapists delivering the intervention to assess facilitators and barriers to adoption into clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Therapist trainings took place between February 2020 and December 2021 and were primarily virtual due to the COVID-19 pandemic. We surveyed 190 trainees and 27 active therapists regarding their experiences with the training process and with delivering the intervention to families, respectively. Descriptive statistics were reported for Likert scale items. Open-ended survey responses were summarized using inductive thematic analysis by two independent coders, and themes were compared by profession.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The majority of trainees reported that they felt comfortable or very confident using the TOPS intervention with patients following the training. Trainees reported that they benefited from clinician-centered and applied training components. Active therapists identified facilitators to TOPS implementation including the family-based therapeutic approach, virtual format, and the broad generalizability of the problem-solving framework. Barriers to implementation included low family engagement, comorbid mental health or language difficulties, and external family stressors.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The implementation process for TOPS highlights the importance of and challenges to the dissemination of psychosocial interventions. As pediatric ABI remains an underserved population within behavioral health, future implementation work should address barriers in integrating evidence-based therapies within clinical practice. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":47974,"journal":{"name":"Rehabilitation Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rehabilitation Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/rep0000537","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To describe the training process for teen online problem solving (TOPS) for acquired brain injury (ABI) in adolescence. We evaluated feedback from training participants and therapists delivering the intervention to assess facilitators and barriers to adoption into clinical practice.
Method: Therapist trainings took place between February 2020 and December 2021 and were primarily virtual due to the COVID-19 pandemic. We surveyed 190 trainees and 27 active therapists regarding their experiences with the training process and with delivering the intervention to families, respectively. Descriptive statistics were reported for Likert scale items. Open-ended survey responses were summarized using inductive thematic analysis by two independent coders, and themes were compared by profession.
Results: The majority of trainees reported that they felt comfortable or very confident using the TOPS intervention with patients following the training. Trainees reported that they benefited from clinician-centered and applied training components. Active therapists identified facilitators to TOPS implementation including the family-based therapeutic approach, virtual format, and the broad generalizability of the problem-solving framework. Barriers to implementation included low family engagement, comorbid mental health or language difficulties, and external family stressors.
Conclusions: The implementation process for TOPS highlights the importance of and challenges to the dissemination of psychosocial interventions. As pediatric ABI remains an underserved population within behavioral health, future implementation work should address barriers in integrating evidence-based therapies within clinical practice. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
期刊介绍：
Rehabilitation Psychology is a quarterly peer-reviewed journal that publishes articles in furtherance of the mission of Division 22 (Rehabilitation Psychology) of the American Psychological Association and to advance the science and practice of rehabilitation psychology. Rehabilitation psychologists consider the entire network of biological, psychological, social, environmental, and political factors that affect the functioning of persons with disabilities or chronic illness. Given the breadth of rehabilitation psychology, the journal"s scope is broadly defined.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
