Eduardo Delamare, Xingyue Fu, Zimo Huang, Jinman Kim
{"title":"Panoramic imaging errors in machine learning model development: a systematic review.","authors":"Eduardo Delamare, Xingyue Fu, Zimo Huang, Jinman Kim","doi":"10.1093/dmfr/twae002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To investigate the management of imaging errors from panoramic radiography (PAN) datasets used in the development of machine learning (ML) models.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This systematic literature followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses and used three databases. Keywords were selected from relevant literature.</p><p><strong>Eligibility criteria: </strong>PAN studies that used ML models and mentioned image quality concerns.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 400 articles, 41 papers satisfied the inclusion criteria. All the studies used ML models, with 35 papers using deep learning (DL) models. PAN quality assessment was approached in 3 ways: acknowledgement and acceptance of imaging errors in the ML model, removal of low-quality radiographs from the dataset before building the model, and application of image enhancement methods prior to model development. The criteria for determining PAN image quality varied widely across studies and were prone to bias.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study revealed significant inconsistencies in the management of PAN imaging errors in ML research. However, most studies agree that such errors are detrimental when building ML models. More research is needed to understand the impact of low-quality inputs on model performance. Prospective studies may streamline image quality assessment by leveraging DL models, which excel at pattern recognition tasks.</p>","PeriodicalId":11261,"journal":{"name":"Dento maxillo facial radiology","volume":" ","pages":"165-172"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11003661/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dento maxillo facial radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/dmfr/twae002","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: To investigate the management of imaging errors from panoramic radiography (PAN) datasets used in the development of machine learning (ML) models.
Methods: This systematic literature followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses and used three databases. Keywords were selected from relevant literature.
Eligibility criteria: PAN studies that used ML models and mentioned image quality concerns.
Results: Out of 400 articles, 41 papers satisfied the inclusion criteria. All the studies used ML models, with 35 papers using deep learning (DL) models. PAN quality assessment was approached in 3 ways: acknowledgement and acceptance of imaging errors in the ML model, removal of low-quality radiographs from the dataset before building the model, and application of image enhancement methods prior to model development. The criteria for determining PAN image quality varied widely across studies and were prone to bias.
Conclusions: This study revealed significant inconsistencies in the management of PAN imaging errors in ML research. However, most studies agree that such errors are detrimental when building ML models. More research is needed to understand the impact of low-quality inputs on model performance. Prospective studies may streamline image quality assessment by leveraging DL models, which excel at pattern recognition tasks.
目的研究用于开发机器学习(ML)模型的全景放射摄影(PAN)数据集的成像错误管理:该系统文献遵循《系统综述和元分析首选报告项目》,并使用了三个数据库。从相关文献中选取关键词:使用 ML 模型并提及图像质量问题的 PAN 研究:在 400 篇文章中,有 41 篇符合纳入标准。所有研究都使用了 ML 模型,其中 35 篇论文使用了深度学习 (DL) 模型。PAN 质量评估有三种方法:承认并接受 ML 模型中的成像错误;在建立模型前从数据集中删除低质量的放射照片;在模型开发前应用图像增强方法。不同研究对 PAN 图像质量的判定标准差异很大,而且容易产生偏差:本研究揭示了 ML 研究中对 PAN 成像误差管理的严重不一致。然而,大多数研究都认为,在建立 ML 模型时,这种误差是有害的。需要开展更多研究,以了解低质量输入对模型性能的影响。前瞻性研究可以利用擅长模式识别任务的 DL 模型来简化图像质量评估。
期刊介绍:
Dentomaxillofacial Radiology (DMFR) is the journal of the International Association of Dentomaxillofacial Radiology (IADMFR) and covers the closely related fields of oral radiology and head and neck imaging.
Established in 1972, DMFR is a key resource keeping dentists, radiologists and clinicians and scientists with an interest in Head and Neck imaging abreast of important research and developments in oral and maxillofacial radiology.
The DMFR editorial board features a panel of international experts including Editor-in-Chief Professor Ralf Schulze. Our editorial board provide their expertise and guidance in shaping the content and direction of the journal.
Quick Facts:
- 2015 Impact Factor - 1.919
- Receipt to first decision - average of 3 weeks
- Acceptance to online publication - average of 3 weeks
- Open access option
- ISSN: 0250-832X
- eISSN: 1476-542X