Towards Faithful Model Explanation in NLP: A Survey

IF 9.3 2区 计算机科学
Qing Lyu, Marianna Apidianaki, Chris Callison-Burch
{"title":"Towards Faithful Model Explanation in NLP: A Survey","authors":"Qing Lyu, Marianna Apidianaki, Chris Callison-Burch","doi":"10.1162/coli_a_00511","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"End-to-end neural Natural Language Processing (NLP) models are notoriously difficult to understand. This has given rise to numerous efforts towards model explainability in recent years. One desideratum of model explanation is faithfulness, i.e. an explanation should accurately represent the reasoning process behind the model’s prediction. In this survey, we review over 110 model explanation methods in NLP through the lens of faithfulness. We first discuss the definition and evaluation of faithfulness, as well as its significance for explainability. We then introduce recent advances in faithful explanation, grouping existing approaches into five categories: similarity-based methods, analysis of model-internal structures, backpropagation-based methods, counterfactual intervention, and self-explanatory models. For each category, we synthesize its representative studies, strengths, and weaknesses. Finally, we summarize their common virtues and remaining challenges, and reflect on future work directions towards faithful explainability in NLP.","PeriodicalId":49089,"journal":{"name":"Computational Linguistics","volume":"26 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computational Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1162/coli_a_00511","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

End-to-end neural Natural Language Processing (NLP) models are notoriously difficult to understand. This has given rise to numerous efforts towards model explainability in recent years. One desideratum of model explanation is faithfulness, i.e. an explanation should accurately represent the reasoning process behind the model’s prediction. In this survey, we review over 110 model explanation methods in NLP through the lens of faithfulness. We first discuss the definition and evaluation of faithfulness, as well as its significance for explainability. We then introduce recent advances in faithful explanation, grouping existing approaches into five categories: similarity-based methods, analysis of model-internal structures, backpropagation-based methods, counterfactual intervention, and self-explanatory models. For each category, we synthesize its representative studies, strengths, and weaknesses. Finally, we summarize their common virtues and remaining challenges, and reflect on future work directions towards faithful explainability in NLP.
在 NLP 中实现忠实模型解释:一项调查
众所周知,端到端神经自然语言处理(NLP)模型很难理解。因此,近年来人们为模型的可解释性做出了许多努力。模型解释的一个必要条件是忠实性,即解释应准确地表达模型预测背后的推理过程。在本调查中,我们从忠实性的角度回顾了 NLP 中的 110 多种模型解释方法。我们首先讨论了忠实性的定义和评估,以及它对可解释性的意义。然后,我们介绍了忠实解释的最新进展,并将现有方法分为五类:基于相似性的方法、模型内部结构分析、基于反向传播的方法、反事实干预和自解释模型。对于每一类方法,我们都对其代表性研究、优势和劣势进行了综述。最后,我们总结了它们的共同优点和仍然存在的挑战,并思考了未来在 NLP 中实现忠实可解释性的工作方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Computational Linguistics
Computational Linguistics Computer Science-Artificial Intelligence
自引率
0.00%
发文量
45
期刊介绍: Computational Linguistics is the longest-running publication devoted exclusively to the computational and mathematical properties of language and the design and analysis of natural language processing systems. This highly regarded quarterly offers university and industry linguists, computational linguists, artificial intelligence and machine learning investigators, cognitive scientists, speech specialists, and philosophers the latest information about the computational aspects of all the facets of research on language.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信