Relative Assessment of Selected Machine Learning Techniques for Predicting Aerodynamic Coefficients of Airfoil

IF 1.5 4区 工程技术 Q3 ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL
Shakeel Ahmed, Khurram Kamal, Tahir Abdul Hussain Ratlamwala
{"title":"Relative Assessment of Selected Machine Learning Techniques for Predicting Aerodynamic Coefficients of Airfoil","authors":"Shakeel Ahmed, Khurram Kamal, Tahir Abdul Hussain Ratlamwala","doi":"10.1007/s40997-023-00748-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In computational fluid dynamics, RANS expressions are solved numerically, as a cheap replacement for experimental work with an acceptable forecast accuracy compromise. Recently, use of machine learning techniques has increased significantly and has been useful in many sectors including aerodynamics. This paper examines the application of three distinct machine learning approaches to compute and predict aerodynamic coefficients of airfoil. We employ back-propagation neural networks, regression trees, and support vector machines to model the complex relationship between airfoil geometry, flow conditions, and the resulting aerodynamic coefficients. Our study investigates the applicability of these machine learning models and compares their performance to identify the most effective model for predicting airfoil coefficients. Overall, among all the different machine learning models examined, back-propagation neural networks demonstrated the best performance in terms of mean squared error and correlation coefficient values. Notably, for predicting coefficient of drag, the fine tree model achieved the lowest mean squared error of 3.1704 <span>\\(\\times\\)</span> 10<sup>–7</sup>, while for the prediction of coefficient of lift, the lowest mean squared error of 4.9766 <span>\\(\\times\\)</span> 10<sup>–7</sup> was obtained by the back-propagation neural networks. This research not only offers deeper understanding of how machine learning techniques could play a pivotal role in enhancing airfoil coefficients predictions but also provides a practical application for improving aerodynamic designs in various engineering fields.</p>","PeriodicalId":49063,"journal":{"name":"Iranian Journal of Science and Technology-Transactions of Mechanical Engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Iranian Journal of Science and Technology-Transactions of Mechanical Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40997-023-00748-5","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In computational fluid dynamics, RANS expressions are solved numerically, as a cheap replacement for experimental work with an acceptable forecast accuracy compromise. Recently, use of machine learning techniques has increased significantly and has been useful in many sectors including aerodynamics. This paper examines the application of three distinct machine learning approaches to compute and predict aerodynamic coefficients of airfoil. We employ back-propagation neural networks, regression trees, and support vector machines to model the complex relationship between airfoil geometry, flow conditions, and the resulting aerodynamic coefficients. Our study investigates the applicability of these machine learning models and compares their performance to identify the most effective model for predicting airfoil coefficients. Overall, among all the different machine learning models examined, back-propagation neural networks demonstrated the best performance in terms of mean squared error and correlation coefficient values. Notably, for predicting coefficient of drag, the fine tree model achieved the lowest mean squared error of 3.1704 \(\times\) 10–7, while for the prediction of coefficient of lift, the lowest mean squared error of 4.9766 \(\times\) 10–7 was obtained by the back-propagation neural networks. This research not only offers deeper understanding of how machine learning techniques could play a pivotal role in enhancing airfoil coefficients predictions but also provides a practical application for improving aerodynamic designs in various engineering fields.

Abstract Image

预测机翼气动系数的若干机器学习技术的相对评估
在计算流体动力学中,RANS 表达式采用数值求解,作为实验工作的廉价替代品,其预测精度可以接受。最近,机器学习技术的使用显著增加,在包括空气动力学在内的许多领域都很有用。本文研究了三种不同的机器学习方法在计算和预测机翼气动系数中的应用。我们采用反向传播神经网络、回归树和支持向量机来模拟机翼几何形状、流动条件和由此产生的空气动力系数之间的复杂关系。我们的研究调查了这些机器学习模型的适用性,并比较了它们的性能,以确定预测机翼系数的最有效模型。总体而言,在所有不同的机器学习模型中,反向传播神经网络在均方误差和相关系数值方面表现最佳。值得注意的是,在预测阻力系数时,精细树模型的均方误差最小,为 3.1704 \(\times\) 10-7;而在预测升力系数时,反向传播神经网络的均方误差最小,为 4.9766 \(\times\) 10-7。这项研究不仅加深了人们对机器学习技术如何在提高机翼系数预测方面发挥关键作用的理解,而且为改进各工程领域的空气动力学设计提供了实际应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
7.70%
发文量
76
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Transactions of Mechanical Engineering is to foster the growth of scientific research in all branches of mechanical engineering and its related grounds and to provide a medium by means of which the fruits of these researches may be brought to the attentionof the world’s scientific communities. The journal has the focus on the frontier topics in the theoretical, mathematical, numerical, experimental and scientific developments in mechanical engineering as well as applications of established techniques to new domains in various mechanical engineering disciplines such as: Solid Mechanics, Kinematics, Dynamics Vibration and Control, Fluids Mechanics, Thermodynamics and Heat Transfer, Energy and Environment, Computational Mechanics, Bio Micro and Nano Mechanics and Design and Materials Engineering & Manufacturing. The editors will welcome papers from all professors and researchers from universities, research centers, organizations, companies and industries from all over the world in the hope that this will advance the scientific standards of the journal and provide a channel of communication between Iranian Scholars and their colleague in other parts of the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信