Elements for Automatic Identification of Fallacies in Mexican Election Campaign Political Speeches

IF 0.7 4区 计算机科学 Q4 COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING
Kenia Nieto-Benitez, Noe Alejandro Castro-Sanchez, Hector Jimenez Salazar, Gemma Bel-Enguix, Dante Mújica Vargas, Juan Gabriel González Serna, Nimrod González Franco
{"title":"Elements for Automatic Identification of Fallacies in Mexican Election Campaign Political Speeches","authors":"Kenia Nieto-Benitez, Noe Alejandro Castro-Sanchez, Hector Jimenez Salazar, Gemma Bel-Enguix, Dante Mújica Vargas, Juan Gabriel González Serna, Nimrod González Franco","doi":"10.1134/s0361768823080170","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Abstract</h3><p>Political speeches frequently use fallacies to sway voters during electoral campaigns. This study presents an approach for implementing machine learning models to automatically identify a specific type of fallacy known as an “appeal to emotion” fallacy. The objective is to establish a set of elements that enable the application of fallacy mining, as in existing literature, fallacies are typically identified manually, and there is no established structure for applying mining techniques. Our method utilizes features derived from an emotion lexicon to differentiate between valid arguments and fallacies, and we employed Support Vector Machine and Multilayer Perceptron models. Our results indicate that the Multilayer Perceptron model achieved an F1‑score of 0.60 in identifying fallacies. Based on our analysis, we recommend the use of lexical dictionaries to effectively identify “appeal to emotion” fallacies.</p>","PeriodicalId":54555,"journal":{"name":"Programming and Computer Software","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Programming and Computer Software","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1134/s0361768823080170","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Political speeches frequently use fallacies to sway voters during electoral campaigns. This study presents an approach for implementing machine learning models to automatically identify a specific type of fallacy known as an “appeal to emotion” fallacy. The objective is to establish a set of elements that enable the application of fallacy mining, as in existing literature, fallacies are typically identified manually, and there is no established structure for applying mining techniques. Our method utilizes features derived from an emotion lexicon to differentiate between valid arguments and fallacies, and we employed Support Vector Machine and Multilayer Perceptron models. Our results indicate that the Multilayer Perceptron model achieved an F1‑score of 0.60 in identifying fallacies. Based on our analysis, we recommend the use of lexical dictionaries to effectively identify “appeal to emotion” fallacies.

Abstract Image

自动识别墨西哥竞选政治演讲谬误的要素
摘要 在竞选期间,政治演讲经常使用谬误来左右选民。本研究提出了一种实施机器学习模型的方法,用于自动识别一种特定类型的谬误,即 "诉诸情感 "谬误。我们的目标是建立一套能够应用谬误挖掘的要素,因为在现有文献中,谬误通常是由人工识别的,而且没有应用挖掘技术的既定结构。我们的方法利用从情感词典中提取的特征来区分有效论据和谬误,并采用了支持向量机和多层感知器模型。结果表明,多层感知器模型在识别谬误方面的 F1 分数为 0.60。根据我们的分析,我们建议使用词汇词典来有效识别 "诉诸情感 "谬误。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Programming and Computer Software
Programming and Computer Software 工程技术-计算机:软件工程
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
28.60%
发文量
35
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Programming and Computer Software is a peer reviewed journal devoted to problems in all areas of computer science: operating systems, compiler technology, software engineering, artificial intelligence, etc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信