Informal sale of antibiotics in Guatemalan convenience stores before and after implementation of federal antibiotic dispensing legislation

N. Rojop, P. Moreno, L. Grajeda, J. Romero, L. Reynoso, E. Muñoz, G. H. Palmer, C. Cordón-Rosales, D. R. Call, B. M. Ramay
{"title":"Informal sale of antibiotics in Guatemalan convenience stores before and after implementation of federal antibiotic dispensing legislation","authors":"N. Rojop, P. Moreno, L. Grajeda, J. Romero, L. Reynoso, E. Muñoz, G. H. Palmer, C. Cordón-Rosales, D. R. Call, B. M. Ramay","doi":"10.1186/s40360-023-00720-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Convenience stores in Guatemala provide essential consumer goods in communities, but many dispense antibiotics illegally. Federal legislation, passed in August of 2019, requires prescriptions for antibiotic purchase at pharmacies but it is unclear if this legislation is enforced or if it has any impact on unlawful sales of antibiotics. To determine if antibiotic availability changed in convenience stores, we carried out a repeated measures study collecting antibiotic availability data before and after implementation of the dispensing regulation. There was no statistical difference in the proportion of convenience stores that sold antibiotics before and after antibiotic regulations [66.6% (295/443) and 66.7% (323/484), respectively, P>0.96], nor in the number of stores selling amoxicillin [55.5% (246/443) and 52.3% (253/484), respectively, P>0.96], but fewer stores (20%) sold tetracycline capsules after regulation was passed (P<0.05). For stores visited both before and after passage of legislation (n=157), 15% stopped selling antibiotics while 25% started selling antibiotics. Antibiotics from convenience stores were reportedly sold for use in people and animals. Antibiotics remain widely available in convenience stores consistent with no significant change in the informal sector after implementation of prescription requirements for pharmacies. Importantly, effects from regulatory change could have been masked by potential changes in antibiotic use during the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic.","PeriodicalId":501597,"journal":{"name":"BMC Pharmacology and Toxicology","volume":"7 3-4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Pharmacology and Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40360-023-00720-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Convenience stores in Guatemala provide essential consumer goods in communities, but many dispense antibiotics illegally. Federal legislation, passed in August of 2019, requires prescriptions for antibiotic purchase at pharmacies but it is unclear if this legislation is enforced or if it has any impact on unlawful sales of antibiotics. To determine if antibiotic availability changed in convenience stores, we carried out a repeated measures study collecting antibiotic availability data before and after implementation of the dispensing regulation. There was no statistical difference in the proportion of convenience stores that sold antibiotics before and after antibiotic regulations [66.6% (295/443) and 66.7% (323/484), respectively, P>0.96], nor in the number of stores selling amoxicillin [55.5% (246/443) and 52.3% (253/484), respectively, P>0.96], but fewer stores (20%) sold tetracycline capsules after regulation was passed (P<0.05). For stores visited both before and after passage of legislation (n=157), 15% stopped selling antibiotics while 25% started selling antibiotics. Antibiotics from convenience stores were reportedly sold for use in people and animals. Antibiotics remain widely available in convenience stores consistent with no significant change in the informal sector after implementation of prescription requirements for pharmacies. Importantly, effects from regulatory change could have been masked by potential changes in antibiotic use during the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic.
联邦抗生素配药法实施前后危地马拉便利店的抗生素非正规销售情况
危地马拉的便利店为社区提供基本消费品,但许多便利店非法销售抗生素。2019 年 8 月通过的联邦立法要求在药店购买抗生素时必须开具处方,但目前尚不清楚该立法是否得到执行,也不清楚该立法对抗生素的非法销售是否有影响。为了确定便利店的抗生素供应是否发生了变化,我们开展了一项重复测量研究,收集配药法规实施前后的抗生素供应数据。在抗生素法规实施前后,销售抗生素的便利店比例没有统计学差异[分别为 66.6% (295/443) 和 66.7% (323/484),P>0.96],销售阿莫西林的便利店数量也没有统计学差异[分别为 55.5% (246/443) 和 52.3% (253/484),P>0.96],但法规通过后,销售四环素胶囊的便利店数量减少(20%)(P<0.05)。在立法通过前后访问的商店中(n=157),15%的商店停止销售抗生素,25%的商店开始销售抗生素。据报道,便利店出售的抗生素用于人和动物。在对药店实施处方要求后,非正规部门没有发生重大变化,因此抗生素仍然在便利店广泛销售。重要的是,在严重急性呼吸系统综合症冠状病毒 2(SARS-CoV-2)大流行期间,抗生素使用的潜在变化可能掩盖了监管变化的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信