P743 A personalised algorithm predicting the risk of intravenous corticosteroid failure in acute ulcerative colitis

A Croft, S Okano, G Hartel, A Lord, G Walker, G Radford-Smith
{"title":"P743 A personalised algorithm predicting the risk of intravenous corticosteroid failure in acute ulcerative colitis","authors":"A Croft, S Okano, G Hartel, A Lord, G Walker, G Radford-Smith","doi":"10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjad212.0873","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background An episode of acute ulcerative colitis (UC) represents an important watershed moment in a patient’s disease course. Foreknowledge of a patient's likely response to intravenous corticosteroid therapy has significant clinical utility. Using a large prospectively collected acute UC patient database and machine learning-based techniques we aimed to derive and validate a personalised algorithm for identifying patients at high risk of corticosteroid therapy failure from variables available at hospital presentation. Methods A prospectively collected database of 600 consecutive presentations of acute UC was collated at a single referral centre between 1996 and 2022. An AIC-based Elastic Net model was used to select variables on the 419 earliest presentations of acute UC (1996-2017). Two risk-scoring algorithms, with and without utilising additional endoscopic variables, were constructed using logistic regression models. These risk scores were then validated on a separate cohort of 181 acute UC presentations (2018-2022). Results The partial risk of rescue (ROR) score included the admission indices of oral corticosteroid treatment; bowel frequency ≥6/24 hours; albumin; CRP ≥12mg/ml and log10CRP. The full ROR score incorporates the same variables with the addition of the Mayo endoscopic subscore and disease extent. The ROC AUCs in the validation cohort were 0.76 (95% CI: 0.69-0.83) and 0.78 (95% CI: 0.71-0.85) for the partial and full ROR scores, respectively. When incomplete cases were excluded, the full ROR score validation cohort ROC AUC increased from 0.78 to 0.80. Conclusion These pragmatic personalised risk scores (available at www.severecolitis.com) have comparably strong performance characteristics and usability enabling the identification of individuals at high risk of corticosteroid treatment failure before or after endoscopic assessment. These patients may be suitable for consideration of early treatment escalation or screening for participation in clinical trials.","PeriodicalId":15453,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Crohn's and Colitis","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Crohn's and Colitis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjad212.0873","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background An episode of acute ulcerative colitis (UC) represents an important watershed moment in a patient’s disease course. Foreknowledge of a patient's likely response to intravenous corticosteroid therapy has significant clinical utility. Using a large prospectively collected acute UC patient database and machine learning-based techniques we aimed to derive and validate a personalised algorithm for identifying patients at high risk of corticosteroid therapy failure from variables available at hospital presentation. Methods A prospectively collected database of 600 consecutive presentations of acute UC was collated at a single referral centre between 1996 and 2022. An AIC-based Elastic Net model was used to select variables on the 419 earliest presentations of acute UC (1996-2017). Two risk-scoring algorithms, with and without utilising additional endoscopic variables, were constructed using logistic regression models. These risk scores were then validated on a separate cohort of 181 acute UC presentations (2018-2022). Results The partial risk of rescue (ROR) score included the admission indices of oral corticosteroid treatment; bowel frequency ≥6/24 hours; albumin; CRP ≥12mg/ml and log10CRP. The full ROR score incorporates the same variables with the addition of the Mayo endoscopic subscore and disease extent. The ROC AUCs in the validation cohort were 0.76 (95% CI: 0.69-0.83) and 0.78 (95% CI: 0.71-0.85) for the partial and full ROR scores, respectively. When incomplete cases were excluded, the full ROR score validation cohort ROC AUC increased from 0.78 to 0.80. Conclusion These pragmatic personalised risk scores (available at www.severecolitis.com) have comparably strong performance characteristics and usability enabling the identification of individuals at high risk of corticosteroid treatment failure before or after endoscopic assessment. These patients may be suitable for consideration of early treatment escalation or screening for participation in clinical trials.
P743 预测急性溃疡性结肠炎静脉注射皮质类固醇失败风险的个性化算法
背景 急性溃疡性结肠炎(UC)的发作是患者病程中的一个重要分水岭。预知患者对静脉注射皮质类固醇治疗的可能反应具有重要的临床作用。利用大型前瞻性收集的急性 UC 患者数据库和基于机器学习的技术,我们旨在推导并验证一种个性化算法,从患者入院时可获得的变量中识别出皮质类固醇治疗失败的高风险患者。方法 1996 年至 2022 年间,我们在一家转诊中心整理了一个前瞻性数据库,其中包含 600 例连续就诊的急性 UC 患者。采用基于 AIC 的弹性网模型对 419 例最早出现的急性 UC(1996-2017 年)进行变量筛选。利用逻辑回归模型构建了两种风险评分算法,分别使用和不使用额外的内镜变量。然后在单独的 181 例急性 UC 病例队列(2018-2022 年)中对这些风险评分进行了验证。结果 部分抢救风险(ROR)评分包括以下入院指标:口服皮质类固醇治疗;排便次数≥6/24小时;白蛋白;CRP≥12mg/ml和log10CRP。ROR 满分包含相同的变量,但增加了梅奥内镜子评分和疾病程度。在验证队列中,部分和完整 ROR 评分的 ROC AUC 分别为 0.76(95% CI:0.69-0.83)和 0.78(95% CI:0.71-0.85)。排除不完整病例后,完整 ROR 评分验证队列的 ROC AUC 从 0.78 增加到 0.80。结论 这些实用的个性化风险评分(见 www.severecolitis.com)具有相当强的性能特点和可用性,能够在内镜评估之前或之后识别出皮质类固醇治疗失败的高风险人群。这些患者可能适合考虑早期升级治疗或筛选参与临床试验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信