P525 Utilisation of endoscopic ultrasonography for submucosal cushion measurement to determine eligibility for endoscopic submucosal dissection in ulcerative colitis-associated dysplasia: A case series

K Kim, S W Hong, S W Hwang, S H Park, B D Ye, J S Byeon, S J Myung, S K Yang, D H Yang
{"title":"P525 Utilisation of endoscopic ultrasonography for submucosal cushion measurement to determine eligibility for endoscopic submucosal dissection in ulcerative colitis-associated dysplasia: A case series","authors":"K Kim, S W Hong, S W Hwang, S H Park, B D Ye, J S Byeon, S J Myung, S K Yang, D H Yang","doi":"10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjad212.0655","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has gained traction as an effective therapy for ulcerative colitis (UC)-associated dysplasia, yet identifying fitting ESD candidates is challenging by substantial submucosal (SM) fibrosis from chronic inflammation. We report our experience utilising endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) to assess ESD eligibility by measuring SM cushion thickness. Methods Retrospective case-series includes nine patients who were diagnosed or referred to as UC-associated dysplasia in surveillance colonoscopies between August 2017 and October 2023. After scanning dysplastic lesions (Fig A-B), hyaluronic acid solution was injected into the SM layer (Fig C). EUS with a mini-probe quantified SM cushion beneath the dysplastic lesion (Fig D), and ESD was performed in cases with at least 2.0 mm of SM cushion thickness (Fig E-F). Results Among ten cases from nine patients, eight cases met the criteria and underwent ESD, while two cases (Patient 3, Patient 7) were regarded as unsuitable for ESD with SM cushion thickness less than 2.0 mm. Median disease duration was 19 years, and median age at diagnosis of UC-associated dysplasia was 50 years. Median SM cushion thickness ranged from 4.2 to 6.9 mm. Median procedure time was 50 minutes, and median size of resected specimens and lesions were 31.5 x 24.5 mm and 16.0 x 12.5 mm, respectively. en bloc resection was achieved in all cases, with an 87.5% R0 resection rate. No perforation occurred; only one required post-discharge endoscopic bleeding control after four days post-discharge. Conclusion EUS-measured SM cushion thickness may be a valid approach that provides an objective criterion for determining ESD eligibility in UC-associated dysplasia. This would help guide individualised treatment in UC-associated dysplasia, reducing unnecessary procedures or surgery.","PeriodicalId":15453,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Crohn's and Colitis","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Crohn's and Colitis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjad212.0655","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has gained traction as an effective therapy for ulcerative colitis (UC)-associated dysplasia, yet identifying fitting ESD candidates is challenging by substantial submucosal (SM) fibrosis from chronic inflammation. We report our experience utilising endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) to assess ESD eligibility by measuring SM cushion thickness. Methods Retrospective case-series includes nine patients who were diagnosed or referred to as UC-associated dysplasia in surveillance colonoscopies between August 2017 and October 2023. After scanning dysplastic lesions (Fig A-B), hyaluronic acid solution was injected into the SM layer (Fig C). EUS with a mini-probe quantified SM cushion beneath the dysplastic lesion (Fig D), and ESD was performed in cases with at least 2.0 mm of SM cushion thickness (Fig E-F). Results Among ten cases from nine patients, eight cases met the criteria and underwent ESD, while two cases (Patient 3, Patient 7) were regarded as unsuitable for ESD with SM cushion thickness less than 2.0 mm. Median disease duration was 19 years, and median age at diagnosis of UC-associated dysplasia was 50 years. Median SM cushion thickness ranged from 4.2 to 6.9 mm. Median procedure time was 50 minutes, and median size of resected specimens and lesions were 31.5 x 24.5 mm and 16.0 x 12.5 mm, respectively. en bloc resection was achieved in all cases, with an 87.5% R0 resection rate. No perforation occurred; only one required post-discharge endoscopic bleeding control after four days post-discharge. Conclusion EUS-measured SM cushion thickness may be a valid approach that provides an objective criterion for determining ESD eligibility in UC-associated dysplasia. This would help guide individualised treatment in UC-associated dysplasia, reducing unnecessary procedures or surgery.
P525 在溃疡性结肠炎相关发育不良患者中利用内镜超声波测量黏膜下垫以确定内镜黏膜下剥离术的资格:病例系列
背景内镜黏膜下剥离术(ESD)作为治疗溃疡性结肠炎(UC)相关性发育不良的有效疗法已受到广泛关注,但由于慢性炎症导致黏膜下(SM)大量纤维化,确定合适的 ESD 候选者具有挑战性。我们报告了利用内镜超声波成像(EUS)测量粘膜下纤维垫厚度来评估ESD资格的经验。方法 回顾性病例系列包括 2017 年 8 月至 2023 年 10 月期间在监测结肠镜检查中被诊断为或转诊为 UC 相关性发育不良的九名患者。扫描发育不良病灶后(图 A-B),向 SM 层注射透明质酸溶液(图 C)。用微型探头对增生异常病变下的 SM 垫进行 EUS 定量(图 D),对 SM 垫厚度至少为 2.0 mm 的病例进行 ESD(图 E-F)。结果 在来自 9 名患者的 10 个病例中,8 个病例符合标准并接受了 ESD,2 个病例(患者 3 和患者 7)因 SM 衬垫厚度小于 2.0 毫米而被视为不适合 ESD。中位病程为19年,确诊UC相关发育不良的中位年龄为50岁。SM垫厚度中位数为4.2至6.9毫米。中位手术时间为50分钟,切除标本和病灶的中位尺寸分别为31.5 x 24.5 mm和16.0 x 12.5 mm。所有病例均实现了全切,R0切除率为87.5%。无穿孔发生;仅有一例患者在出院四天后需要内镜止血。结论 EUS 测量的 SM 衬垫厚度可能是一种有效的方法,为确定 UC 相关发育不良是否符合 ESD 条件提供了客观标准。这将有助于指导 UC 相关性发育不良的个体化治疗,减少不必要的程序或手术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信