Audrey Arjomandi, Ketevan Siradze, Melissa Cheu, Teresa Davancaze, Rajbharan Yadav, Gautham K Rao, Lisa Wong, Saloumeh K Fischer
{"title":"Successful Development of Nonclinical Anti-Drug Antibody Assays to Support Zinpentraxin Alfa Reproductive Toxicology Studies.","authors":"Audrey Arjomandi, Ketevan Siradze, Melissa Cheu, Teresa Davancaze, Rajbharan Yadav, Gautham K Rao, Lisa Wong, Saloumeh K Fischer","doi":"10.1208/s12248-024-00891-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Immunogenicity assessment is an essential part of biotherapeutic drug development. While the immune response in animals is not always representative of the human immune response, immunogenicity data obtained in animal models is still informative for the evaluation of drug exposure and safety. The most common assay format used for the detection of anti-drug antibodies (ADAs) in preclinical and clinical studies is the bridging format. The advantage of this method is that it can detect all antibody isotypes generated against the therapeutic. However, the method development can be time-consuming and labor-intensive, due to the need for labeling of the drug which is used both as capture and detection. Various generic ADA assays have been successfully implemented to overcome these disadvantages and to enable faster assay development timelines to support nonclinical toxicology studies. Here, we describe the challenges in the development of an assay to detect antibodies to zinpentraxin alfa, a recombinant human pentraxin-2, in rabbit and rat toxicology studies. Our initial efforts to develop a bridging assay failed, prompting us to develop a method adapted from generic assay formats to detect anti-zinpentraxin alfa antibodies in the serum of different species with minimal optimization. However, while the general assay format remained similar, assay reagents were adapted between the different species, resulting in the development of two distinct assays for the detection of ADAs in rat and rabbit. Here, we share the final development/validation data and the immunogenicity study results. Our work highlights the need for the evaluation of alternate assay formats when evaluating novel drug modalities.</p>","PeriodicalId":50934,"journal":{"name":"AAPS Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AAPS Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1208/s12248-024-00891-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Immunogenicity assessment is an essential part of biotherapeutic drug development. While the immune response in animals is not always representative of the human immune response, immunogenicity data obtained in animal models is still informative for the evaluation of drug exposure and safety. The most common assay format used for the detection of anti-drug antibodies (ADAs) in preclinical and clinical studies is the bridging format. The advantage of this method is that it can detect all antibody isotypes generated against the therapeutic. However, the method development can be time-consuming and labor-intensive, due to the need for labeling of the drug which is used both as capture and detection. Various generic ADA assays have been successfully implemented to overcome these disadvantages and to enable faster assay development timelines to support nonclinical toxicology studies. Here, we describe the challenges in the development of an assay to detect antibodies to zinpentraxin alfa, a recombinant human pentraxin-2, in rabbit and rat toxicology studies. Our initial efforts to develop a bridging assay failed, prompting us to develop a method adapted from generic assay formats to detect anti-zinpentraxin alfa antibodies in the serum of different species with minimal optimization. However, while the general assay format remained similar, assay reagents were adapted between the different species, resulting in the development of two distinct assays for the detection of ADAs in rat and rabbit. Here, we share the final development/validation data and the immunogenicity study results. Our work highlights the need for the evaluation of alternate assay formats when evaluating novel drug modalities.
免疫原性评估是生物治疗药物开发的重要组成部分。虽然动物的免疫反应并不总能代表人类的免疫反应,但在动物模型中获得的免疫原性数据仍能为评估药物暴露和安全性提供信息。临床前和临床研究中最常用的检测抗药性抗体(ADA)的方法是桥接法。这种方法的优点是可以检测针对治疗药物产生的所有抗体异型。然而,由于需要对用作捕获和检测的药物进行标记,方法开发可能会耗时耗力。为了克服这些缺点并加快检测方法的开发进度以支持非临床毒理学研究,各种通用 ADA 检测方法已被成功应用。在此,我们介绍了在兔和大鼠毒理学研究中开发检测重组人五肽-2(zinpentraxin alfa)抗体的检测方法所面临的挑战。我们最初开发桥接测定法的努力以失败告终,这促使我们开发了一种方法,该方法改编自通用测定格式,只需极少的优化就能检测不同物种血清中的抗津五肽α抗体。然而,虽然一般的检测方法保持相似,但不同物种之间的检测试剂却有所调整,最终开发出了两种不同的检测方法,用于检测大鼠和兔子体内的 ADA。在此,我们分享最终的开发/验证数据和免疫原性研究结果。我们的工作突出表明,在评估新型药物模式时,有必要对其他检测方法进行评估。
期刊介绍:
The AAPS Journal, an official journal of the American Association of Pharmaceutical Scientists (AAPS), publishes novel and significant findings in the various areas of pharmaceutical sciences impacting human and veterinary therapeutics, including:
· Drug Design and Discovery
· Pharmaceutical Biotechnology
· Biopharmaceutics, Formulation, and Drug Delivery
· Metabolism and Transport
· Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, and Pharmacometrics
· Translational Research
· Clinical Evaluations and Therapeutic Outcomes
· Regulatory Science
We invite submissions under the following article types:
· Original Research Articles
· Reviews and Mini-reviews
· White Papers, Commentaries, and Editorials
· Meeting Reports
· Brief/Technical Reports and Rapid Communications
· Regulatory Notes
· Tutorials
· Protocols in the Pharmaceutical Sciences
In addition, The AAPS Journal publishes themes, organized by guest editors, which are focused on particular areas of current interest to our field.