Digital Health Literacy and Social Determinants of Health Affecting Telehealth Use by Athletic Trainers.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 REHABILITATION
Sujal R Patel, Nancy A Uriegas, Tara A Armstrong, Ryan M Stover, Kenneth E Games, Zachary K Winkelmann
{"title":"Digital Health Literacy and Social Determinants of Health Affecting Telehealth Use by Athletic Trainers.","authors":"Sujal R Patel, Nancy A Uriegas, Tara A Armstrong, Ryan M Stover, Kenneth E Games, Zachary K Winkelmann","doi":"10.1123/jsr.2023-0069","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>While increasing telehealth use throughout sports medicine has improved patients' access to health care, some communities may not have the same opportunities to connect with a provider. Barriers to telehealth implementation can be influenced by internal (eg, provider's digital health literacy and resources) and external (eg, community's social determinants of health or \"SDOH\") factors. This study aimed to assess the impact of internal and external factors on telehealth use by athletic trainers (ATs).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Cross-sectional survey.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In total, 767 ATs participated in the study. Participants (age = 39 [13] y) completed a survey containing the electronic health literacy scale and digital health literacy instrument, reported professional use of telehealth as a provider (yes/no), provided resources at their clinical site, and provided the zip code for the community they served. After data collection, the researchers extracted SDOH information using the zip code data from 2 US databases, including population density, median household income, poverty index, education level, and technology access. Chi-square or independent samples t tests were conducted to compare telehealth use by each SDOH factor.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 62.3% (n = 478/767) of ATs reported using telehealth, and 81.6% of ATs (n = 626) had a dedicated facility to offer health care services. We identified a significant difference in digital health literacy scores between users and nonusers of telehealth (P = .013). We did not identify any significant differences between telehealth users by community type (P = .957), population density (P = .053), income (P = .462), poverty index (P = .073), and computer (P = .211) or broadband internet access (P = .295).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our data suggest that internal factors such as digital health literacy and clinical site resources may have contributed to an AT's previous telehealth use in clinical practice. However, the SDOH data extracted from the community zip code where the AT provided clinical services were similar for those with and without previous telehealth use.</p>","PeriodicalId":50041,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sport Rehabilitation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sport Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1123/jsr.2023-0069","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context: While increasing telehealth use throughout sports medicine has improved patients' access to health care, some communities may not have the same opportunities to connect with a provider. Barriers to telehealth implementation can be influenced by internal (eg, provider's digital health literacy and resources) and external (eg, community's social determinants of health or "SDOH") factors. This study aimed to assess the impact of internal and external factors on telehealth use by athletic trainers (ATs).

Design: Cross-sectional survey.

Methods: In total, 767 ATs participated in the study. Participants (age = 39 [13] y) completed a survey containing the electronic health literacy scale and digital health literacy instrument, reported professional use of telehealth as a provider (yes/no), provided resources at their clinical site, and provided the zip code for the community they served. After data collection, the researchers extracted SDOH information using the zip code data from 2 US databases, including population density, median household income, poverty index, education level, and technology access. Chi-square or independent samples t tests were conducted to compare telehealth use by each SDOH factor.

Results: In total, 62.3% (n = 478/767) of ATs reported using telehealth, and 81.6% of ATs (n = 626) had a dedicated facility to offer health care services. We identified a significant difference in digital health literacy scores between users and nonusers of telehealth (P = .013). We did not identify any significant differences between telehealth users by community type (P = .957), population density (P = .053), income (P = .462), poverty index (P = .073), and computer (P = .211) or broadband internet access (P = .295).

Conclusions: Our data suggest that internal factors such as digital health literacy and clinical site resources may have contributed to an AT's previous telehealth use in clinical practice. However, the SDOH data extracted from the community zip code where the AT provided clinical services were similar for those with and without previous telehealth use.

影响运动训练员使用远程保健的数字健康素养和健康的社会决定因素。
背景:虽然在整个运动医学中越来越多地使用远程医疗改善了患者获得医疗保健的机会,但一些社区可能没有同样的机会与医疗服务提供者建立联系。远程医疗实施的障碍可能受到内部因素(如提供者的数字健康知识和资源)和外部因素(如社区的健康社会决定因素或 "SDOH")的影响。本研究旨在评估内部和外部因素对运动训练员(ATs)使用远程保健的影响:设计:横断面调查:共有 767 名运动训练师参与了研究。参与者(年龄 = 39 [13] 岁)完成了一份包含电子健康素养量表和数字健康素养工具的调查,报告了作为提供者对远程医疗的专业使用情况(是/否),提供了其临床站点的资源,并提供了其服务社区的邮政编码。数据收集完成后,研究人员利用两个美国数据库中的邮政编码数据提取了 SDOH 信息,包括人口密度、家庭收入中位数、贫困指数、教育水平和技术使用情况。研究人员进行了卡方检验或独立样本 t 检验,以比较各 SDOH 因素对远程保健的使用情况:共有 62.3%(n = 478/767)的医疗咨询机构报告使用了远程医疗,81.6%(n = 626)的医疗咨询机构拥有提供医疗服务的专用设施。我们发现,远程医疗用户和非用户的数字健康知识得分存在明显差异(P = .013)。我们没有发现远程医疗用户在社区类型(P = .957)、人口密度(P = .053)、收入(P = .462)、贫困指数(P = .073)、计算机(P = .211)或宽带互联网接入(P = .295)方面存在任何明显差异:我们的数据表明,数字健康素养和临床站点资源等内部因素可能会促使医疗服务提供者以前在临床实践中使用远程医疗。然而,从医疗咨询师提供临床服务的社区邮政编码中提取的 SDOH 数据,对于以前使用过远程保健的人和没有使用过远程保健的人来说是相似的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Sport Rehabilitation
Journal of Sport Rehabilitation 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.90%
发文量
143
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Sport Rehabilitation (JSR) is your source for the latest peer-reviewed research in the field of sport rehabilitation. All members of the sports-medicine team will benefit from the wealth of important information in each issue. JSR is completely devoted to the rehabilitation of sport and exercise injuries, regardless of the age, gender, sport ability, level of fitness, or health status of the participant. JSR publishes peer-reviewed original research, systematic reviews/meta-analyses, critically appraised topics (CATs), case studies/series, and technical reports that directly affect the management and rehabilitation of injuries incurred during sport-related activities, irrespective of the individual’s age, gender, sport ability, level of fitness, or health status. The journal is intended to provide an international, multidisciplinary forum to serve the needs of all members of the sports medicine team, including athletic trainers/therapists, sport physical therapists/physiotherapists, sports medicine physicians, and other health care and medical professionals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信