“We will be the ones bearing the consequences”: A qualitative study of barriers and facilitators to shared decision-making in hospital-based maternity care

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Alex Waddell PhD, MPH, BSc, Denise Goodwin PhD, MSc, BSc (Hons), Gerri Spassova PhD, Louise Sampson BA, MPH, Alix Candy B. Speech Pathology, Diploma of Management, Peter Bragge PhD, B. Physio (Hons.), L.T.C.L.
{"title":"“We will be the ones bearing the consequences”: A qualitative study of barriers and facilitators to shared decision-making in hospital-based maternity care","authors":"Alex Waddell PhD, MPH, BSc,&nbsp;Denise Goodwin PhD, MSc, BSc (Hons),&nbsp;Gerri Spassova PhD,&nbsp;Louise Sampson BA, MPH,&nbsp;Alix Candy B. Speech Pathology, Diploma of Management,&nbsp;Peter Bragge PhD, B. Physio (Hons.), L.T.C.L.","doi":"10.1111/birt.12812","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Pregnant women involved in decisions about their care report better health outcomes for themselves and their children. Shared decision-making (SDM) is a priority for health services; however, there is limited research on factors that help and hinder SDM in hospital-based maternity settings. The purpose of this study was to explore barriers and facilitators to SDM in a large tertiary maternity care service from the perspectives of multiple stakeholders.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Qualitative semi-structured interviews were undertaken with 39 participants including women, clinicians, health service administrators and decision-makers, and government policymakers. The interview guide and thematic analysis were based on the Theoretical Domains Framework to identify barriers and facilitators to SDM.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Women expect to be included in decisions about their care. Health service administrators and decision-makers, government policymakers, and most clinicians want to include them in decisions. Key barriers to SDM included lack of care continuity, knowledge, and clinician skills, as well as professional role and decision-making factors. Key facilitators pertained to policy and guideline changes, increased knowledge, professional role factors, and social influences.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>This study revealed common barriers and facilitators to SDM and highlighted the need to consider perspectives outside the patient–clinician dyad. It adds to the limited literature on barriers and facilitators to SDM in hospital care settings. Organizational- and system-wide changes to service delivery are necessary to facilitate SDM. These changes may be enabled by education and training, changes to policies and guidelines to include and support SDM, and adequately timed information provision to enable SDM conversations.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":55350,"journal":{"name":"Birth-Issues in Perinatal Care","volume":"51 3","pages":"581-594"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/birt.12812","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Birth-Issues in Perinatal Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/birt.12812","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Pregnant women involved in decisions about their care report better health outcomes for themselves and their children. Shared decision-making (SDM) is a priority for health services; however, there is limited research on factors that help and hinder SDM in hospital-based maternity settings. The purpose of this study was to explore barriers and facilitators to SDM in a large tertiary maternity care service from the perspectives of multiple stakeholders.

Methods

Qualitative semi-structured interviews were undertaken with 39 participants including women, clinicians, health service administrators and decision-makers, and government policymakers. The interview guide and thematic analysis were based on the Theoretical Domains Framework to identify barriers and facilitators to SDM.

Results

Women expect to be included in decisions about their care. Health service administrators and decision-makers, government policymakers, and most clinicians want to include them in decisions. Key barriers to SDM included lack of care continuity, knowledge, and clinician skills, as well as professional role and decision-making factors. Key facilitators pertained to policy and guideline changes, increased knowledge, professional role factors, and social influences.

Conclusion

This study revealed common barriers and facilitators to SDM and highlighted the need to consider perspectives outside the patient–clinician dyad. It adds to the limited literature on barriers and facilitators to SDM in hospital care settings. Organizational- and system-wide changes to service delivery are necessary to facilitate SDM. These changes may be enabled by education and training, changes to policies and guidelines to include and support SDM, and adequately timed information provision to enable SDM conversations.

"我们将承担后果":关于医院产科护理中共同决策的障碍和促进因素的定性研究。
背景:参与护理决策的孕妇会为自己和孩子带来更好的健康结果。共同决策(SDM)是医疗服务的一个优先事项;然而,关于在医院产科环境中帮助和阻碍 SDM 的因素的研究却很有限。本研究旨在从多方利益相关者的角度,探讨在大型三级产科护理服务中,SDM 的障碍和促进因素:方法:对 39 名参与者进行了半结构化定性访谈,其中包括妇女、临床医生、医疗服务管理者和决策者以及政府政策制定者。访谈指南和主题分析以理论领域框架为基础,以确定 SDM 的障碍和促进因素:结果:妇女希望参与有关其护理的决策。结果:妇女希望参与有关其护理的决策,医疗服务管理者和决策者、政府政策制定者以及大多数临床医生都希望让她们参与决策。SDM 的主要障碍包括缺乏护理的连续性、知识和临床医生的技能,以及专业角色和决策因素。主要促进因素涉及政策和指南的变化、知识的增加、专业角色因素以及社会影响:本研究揭示了 SDM 的常见障碍和促进因素,并强调了考虑患者-医师二人关系以外的观点的必要性。它为有关医院护理环境中 SDM 的障碍和促进因素的有限文献增添了新的内容。为促进 SDM,有必要在组织和系统范围内改变服务提供方式。这些改变可通过教育和培训、政策和指南的改变来实现,以纳入并支持 SDM,并适时提供信息以促成 SDM 对话。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Birth-Issues in Perinatal Care
Birth-Issues in Perinatal Care 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
4.00%
发文量
90
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Birth: Issues in Perinatal Care is a multidisciplinary, refereed journal devoted to issues and practices in the care of childbearing women, infants, and families. It is written by and for professionals in maternal and neonatal health, nurses, midwives, physicians, public health workers, doulas, social scientists, childbirth educators, lactation counselors, epidemiologists, and other health caregivers and policymakers in perinatal care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信