The Role of TAP/RS Block in Minor Gynecologic Laparoscopic Surgery: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-24 DOI:10.1159/000535835
Corrado Terranova, Lorenzo Schiavoni, Fernando Ficarola, Francesco Plotti, Carlo De Cicco Nardone, Roberto Montera, Michela Lotierzo, Martina Bartolone, Giuseppe Pascarella, Alessia Mattei, Fabio Costa, Felice Eugenio Agrò, Roberto Angioli
{"title":"The Role of TAP/RS Block in Minor Gynecologic Laparoscopic Surgery: A Randomized Clinical Trial.","authors":"Corrado Terranova, Lorenzo Schiavoni, Fernando Ficarola, Francesco Plotti, Carlo De Cicco Nardone, Roberto Montera, Michela Lotierzo, Martina Bartolone, Giuseppe Pascarella, Alessia Mattei, Fabio Costa, Felice Eugenio Agrò, Roberto Angioli","doi":"10.1159/000535835","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of the study was to compare, in patients undergoing minor gynecological laparoscopic procedures, the effects of ultrasound (US)-guided transversus abdominis plane (TAP) + rectus sheath (RS) block versus no TAP/RS block in terms of post-surgical pain control using the numeric pain rating scale (NRS) and the degree of patient satisfaction, according to the main goals of Early Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) programs. The primary outcome is to value the postoperative abdominal pain using NRS in both groups. Secondary outcomes are to evaluate blood values, presence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), postoperative ileus, level of patient expected satisfaction, time of discharge, length of stay (LOS), and the amounts of additional analgesics required.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>In this prospective randomized controlled trial, patients were randomly assigned to loco-regional anesthesia (LRA) group, who received TAP and RS block under US guidance, or no loco-regional anesthesia (N-LRA) group. Enrolled patients were randomized 1:1 to either receive bilateral TAP/RS block with ropivacaine or sham treatment (patches were applied on the abdominal wall of the patients under general anesthesia).</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>All patients aged between 18 and 75 years, with ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) physical status 1-2, undergoing laparoscopic minor gynecological surgery, were enrolled.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>The study was conducted to the University of Campus Bio-Medico Hospital of Rome.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Half an hour before surgery, all patients received gabapentin 300 mg per os. Once the patient underwent general anesthesia, US-guided bilateral TAP/RS block was performed by the anesthesiology team, while the uterine manipulator was positioned by a gynecology resident (not involved in the study). In the operative room, all patients received the same standardized anesthetic regimen. Postoperative abdominal pain was assessed at rest, after palpation, during movement, and after a cough by evaluating the patient at 6, 12, 18, 24, 36, 48, and 72 h after surgery, using the NRS from 0 to 10 in both groups. The amount of drug used for analgesia in the first 48 h after surgery was recorded. Moreover, hemoglobin, white blood cells, and c-reactive protein levels were recorded at 24, 48, and 72 h. The presence of PONV and the postoperative ileus was recorded throughout convalescence. The expected level of patient satisfaction at discharge and finally the LOS were assessed.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>The major weakness of this study is that 60 mL of 0.5% ropivacaine was administered to each patient, without considering weight differences, yet contemporary literature rarely suggests volume/dose titration in fascial blocks.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 104 women, undergoing gynecological minor laparoscopic surgery, were enrolled and assigned to LRA group (53 pts) and N-LRA group (51 pts). Postoperative pain was significantly reduced in patients who received TAP/RS block. A reduction in the intake of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs after surgery was registered in LRA group (p &lt; 0.01). Moreover, a significant reduction of LOS (45.97 ± 9.87 vs. 65.08 ± 17.32 h; p &lt; 0.01) and PONV was observed in the LRA group, as well as a better level of patient satisfaction at discharge (9.43 ± 0.94 vs. 8.26 ± 1.19; p &lt; 0.01), compared to the N-LRA group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>US-guided TAP and RS block significantly reduces postoperative pain after minor gynecologic laparoscopic surgery and improves patients' post-operative recovery.</p>","PeriodicalId":12952,"journal":{"name":"Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation","volume":" ","pages":"103-110"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000535835","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of the study was to compare, in patients undergoing minor gynecological laparoscopic procedures, the effects of ultrasound (US)-guided transversus abdominis plane (TAP) + rectus sheath (RS) block versus no TAP/RS block in terms of post-surgical pain control using the numeric pain rating scale (NRS) and the degree of patient satisfaction, according to the main goals of Early Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) programs. The primary outcome is to value the postoperative abdominal pain using NRS in both groups. Secondary outcomes are to evaluate blood values, presence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), postoperative ileus, level of patient expected satisfaction, time of discharge, length of stay (LOS), and the amounts of additional analgesics required.

Design: In this prospective randomized controlled trial, patients were randomly assigned to loco-regional anesthesia (LRA) group, who received TAP and RS block under US guidance, or no loco-regional anesthesia (N-LRA) group. Enrolled patients were randomized 1:1 to either receive bilateral TAP/RS block with ropivacaine or sham treatment (patches were applied on the abdominal wall of the patients under general anesthesia).

Participants: All patients aged between 18 and 75 years, with ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) physical status 1-2, undergoing laparoscopic minor gynecological surgery, were enrolled.

Setting: The study was conducted to the University of Campus Bio-Medico Hospital of Rome.

Methods: Half an hour before surgery, all patients received gabapentin 300 mg per os. Once the patient underwent general anesthesia, US-guided bilateral TAP/RS block was performed by the anesthesiology team, while the uterine manipulator was positioned by a gynecology resident (not involved in the study). In the operative room, all patients received the same standardized anesthetic regimen. Postoperative abdominal pain was assessed at rest, after palpation, during movement, and after a cough by evaluating the patient at 6, 12, 18, 24, 36, 48, and 72 h after surgery, using the NRS from 0 to 10 in both groups. The amount of drug used for analgesia in the first 48 h after surgery was recorded. Moreover, hemoglobin, white blood cells, and c-reactive protein levels were recorded at 24, 48, and 72 h. The presence of PONV and the postoperative ileus was recorded throughout convalescence. The expected level of patient satisfaction at discharge and finally the LOS were assessed.

Limitations: The major weakness of this study is that 60 mL of 0.5% ropivacaine was administered to each patient, without considering weight differences, yet contemporary literature rarely suggests volume/dose titration in fascial blocks.

Results: A total of 104 women, undergoing gynecological minor laparoscopic surgery, were enrolled and assigned to LRA group (53 pts) and N-LRA group (51 pts). Postoperative pain was significantly reduced in patients who received TAP/RS block. A reduction in the intake of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs after surgery was registered in LRA group (p < 0.01). Moreover, a significant reduction of LOS (45.97 ± 9.87 vs. 65.08 ± 17.32 h; p < 0.01) and PONV was observed in the LRA group, as well as a better level of patient satisfaction at discharge (9.43 ± 0.94 vs. 8.26 ± 1.19; p < 0.01), compared to the N-LRA group.

Conclusions: US-guided TAP and RS block significantly reduces postoperative pain after minor gynecologic laparoscopic surgery and improves patients' post-operative recovery.

tap/rs block 在妇科腹腔镜小手术中的作用:随机临床试验。
研究目的本研究旨在根据 "术后早期恢复"(ERAS)计划的主要目标,比较在超声波(US)引导下进行腹横肌平面(TAP)+直肠鞘(RS)阻滞与不进行 TAP/RS 阻滞的妇科腹腔镜小手术患者的术后疼痛控制效果,以及患者的满意度。主要结果是使用 NRS 评估两组患者的术后腹痛程度。次要结果是评估血值、术后恶心和呕吐(PONV)、术后回肠梗阻、患者预期满意度、出院时间、住院时间(LOS)和所需额外镇痛剂的用量:在这项前瞻性随机对照试验中,患者被随机分配到局部区域麻醉(LRA)组(在 US 引导下接受 TAP 和 RS 阻滞)或无局部区域麻醉(N-LRA)组。入组患者按 1:1 随机分配接受罗哌卡因双侧 TAP/RS 阻滞或假治疗(在全身麻醉下在患者腹壁上贴片):所有年龄在18至75岁之间、ASA(美国麻醉医师协会)身体状况为1至2级、接受腹腔镜妇科小手术的患者均被纳入研究范围:方法:手术前半小时,所有患者服用加巴喷丁 300 毫克/次。患者接受全身麻醉后,由麻醉科团队在 US 引导下进行双侧 TAP/RS 阻滞,同时由一名妇科住院医师(不参与研究)定位子宫操作器。在手术室中,所有患者都接受了相同的标准化麻醉方案。两组患者均在术后 6、12、18、24、36、48 和 72 小时使用 0 至 10 分的 NRS 对休息时、触诊后、运动时和咳嗽后的腹痛进行评估。此外,还记录了术后 48 小时内的镇痛用药量。此外,还记录了术后 24、48 和 72 小时的血红蛋白、白细胞和 c 反应蛋白水平。在整个康复过程中,记录了是否出现 PONV 和术后回肠梗阻。评估了患者出院时的预期满意度以及最终的住院时间:本研究的主要不足之处在于,在未考虑体重差异的情况下,为每位患者注射了 60 毫升 0.5%罗哌卡因,而当代文献很少建议在筋膜阻滞中进行容量/剂量滴定:104名接受妇科腹腔镜小手术的女性被选入LRA组(53人)和N-LRA组(51人)。接受 TAP/RS 阻滞治疗的患者术后疼痛明显减轻。LRA组患者术后非甾体抗炎药物的摄入量也有所减少(p结论:US 引导下的 TAP 和 RS 阻滞明显减轻了妇科腹腔镜小手术的术后疼痛,并改善了患者的术后恢复情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
4.80%
发文量
44
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: This journal covers the most active and promising areas of current research in gynecology and obstetrics. Invited, well-referenced reviews by noted experts keep readers in touch with the general framework and direction of international study. Original papers report selected experimental and clinical investigations in all fields related to gynecology, obstetrics and reproduction. Short communications are published to allow immediate discussion of new data. The international and interdisciplinary character of this periodical provides an avenue to less accessible sources and to worldwide research for investigators and practitioners.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信