Controversies in the management of anti-TNF therapy in patients with Crohn's disease: a Delphi consensus.

IF 3.3 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Yago González-Lama, Elena Ricart, Daniel Carpio, Guillermo Bastida, Daniel Ceballos, Daniel Ginard, Ignacio Marin-Jimenez, Luis Menchen, Fernando Muñoz
{"title":"Controversies in the management of anti-TNF therapy in patients with Crohn's disease: a Delphi consensus.","authors":"Yago González-Lama, Elena Ricart, Daniel Carpio, Guillermo Bastida, Daniel Ceballos, Daniel Ginard, Ignacio Marin-Jimenez, Luis Menchen, Fernando Muñoz","doi":"10.1136/bmjgast-2023-001246","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite research, there are still controversial areas in the management of Crohn's disease (CD).</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To establish practical recommendations on using anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF) drugs in patients with moderate-to-severe CD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Clinical controversies in the management of CD using anti-TNF therapies were identified. A comprehensive literature review was performed, and a national survey was launched to examine current clinical practices when using anti-TNF therapies. Their results were discussed by expert gastroenterologists within a nominal group meeting, and a set of statements was proposed and tested in a Delphi process.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Qualitative study. The survey and Delphi process were sent to 244 CD-treating physicians (response rate: 58%). A total of 14 statements were generated. All but two achieved agreement. These statements cover: (1) use of first-line non-anti-TNF biological therapy; (2) role of HLA-DQA1*05 in daily practice; (3) attitudes in primary non-response and loss of response to anti-TNF therapy due to immunogenicity; (4) use of ustekinumab or vedolizumab if a change in action mechanism is warranted; (5) anti-TNF drug level monitoring; (6) combined therapy with an immunomodulator.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This document sought to pull together the best evidence, experts' opinions, and treating physicians' attitudes when using anti-TNF therapies in patients with CD.</p>","PeriodicalId":9235,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Gastroenterology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10870792/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgast-2023-001246","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Despite research, there are still controversial areas in the management of Crohn's disease (CD).

Objective: To establish practical recommendations on using anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF) drugs in patients with moderate-to-severe CD.

Methods: Clinical controversies in the management of CD using anti-TNF therapies were identified. A comprehensive literature review was performed, and a national survey was launched to examine current clinical practices when using anti-TNF therapies. Their results were discussed by expert gastroenterologists within a nominal group meeting, and a set of statements was proposed and tested in a Delphi process.

Results: Qualitative study. The survey and Delphi process were sent to 244 CD-treating physicians (response rate: 58%). A total of 14 statements were generated. All but two achieved agreement. These statements cover: (1) use of first-line non-anti-TNF biological therapy; (2) role of HLA-DQA1*05 in daily practice; (3) attitudes in primary non-response and loss of response to anti-TNF therapy due to immunogenicity; (4) use of ustekinumab or vedolizumab if a change in action mechanism is warranted; (5) anti-TNF drug level monitoring; (6) combined therapy with an immunomodulator.

Conclusion: This document sought to pull together the best evidence, experts' opinions, and treating physicians' attitudes when using anti-TNF therapies in patients with CD.

克罗恩病患者抗肿瘤坏死因子疗法管理中的争议:德尔菲共识。
背景:尽管开展了相关研究,但克罗恩病(CD)的治疗仍存在争议:尽管开展了相关研究,但在克罗恩病(CD)的治疗方面仍存在争议:为中重度克罗恩病患者使用抗肿瘤坏死因子(TNF)药物制定实用建议:方法:确定使用抗肿瘤坏死因子疗法治疗 CD 的临床争议。进行了全面的文献综述,并发起了一项全国性调查,以研究目前使用抗肿瘤坏死因子疗法的临床实践。胃肠病专家在名义小组会议上对调查结果进行了讨论,提出了一套声明,并在德尔菲程序中进行了测试:定性研究。调查和德尔菲程序共发送给 244 名接受 CD 治疗的医生(回复率:58%)。共产生了 14 项陈述。除两份声明外,其他声明均达成一致。这些声明包括:(1) 一线非抗 TNF 生物疗法的使用;(2) HLA-DQA1*05 在日常实践中的作用;(3) 对因免疫原性导致的抗 TNF 治疗原发性无应答和失应的态度;(4) 如果需要改变作用机制,则使用乌司替尼或维多珠单抗;(5) 抗 TNF 药物水平监测;(6) 与免疫调节剂联合治疗:本文件旨在汇集 CD 患者使用抗肿瘤坏死因子疗法时的最佳证据、专家意见和主治医生的态度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMJ Open Gastroenterology
BMJ Open Gastroenterology GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
3.20%
发文量
68
审稿时长
2 weeks
期刊介绍: BMJ Open Gastroenterology is an online-only, peer-reviewed, open access gastroenterology journal, dedicated to publishing high-quality medical research from all disciplines and therapeutic areas of gastroenterology. It is the open access companion journal of Gut and is co-owned by the British Society of Gastroenterology. The journal publishes all research study types, from study protocols to phase I trials to meta-analyses, including small or specialist studies. Publishing procedures are built around continuous publication, publishing research online as soon as the article is ready.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信