Grade-4/5 motor activity log-Brazil for post-stroke individuals with a severely impaired upper limb: a validity, reliability and measurement error study.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
Disability and Rehabilitation Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-24 DOI:10.1080/09638288.2024.2305298
Gabriela da Silva Matuti, Juliana Firmo Dos Santos, Maria Liliane da Silva, Elaine Menezes de Oliveira, Adriana Cláudia Lunardi, Fedora Biney, Gitendra Uswatte, Edward Taub, Sandra Regina Alouche
{"title":"Grade-4/5 motor activity log-Brazil for post-stroke individuals with a severely impaired upper limb: a validity, reliability and measurement error study.","authors":"Gabriela da Silva Matuti, Juliana Firmo Dos Santos, Maria Liliane da Silva, Elaine Menezes de Oliveira, Adriana Cláudia Lunardi, Fedora Biney, Gitendra Uswatte, Edward Taub, Sandra Regina Alouche","doi":"10.1080/09638288.2024.2305298","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study examined the clinimetrics of the Brazilian-Portuguese translation of the Grade-4/5 Motor Activity Log (MAL 4/5), which assesses everyday use of the more affected upper-limb (UL) in stroke survivors with moderate/severe or severe motor impairment.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The translated MAL 4/5 was administered to 47 stroke survivors with moderate/severe or severe UL motor impairment. Accelerometers were worn on participants' wrists for five days on average prior to the first assessment. Test-retest and inter-rater reliabilities were assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), internal consistency using Cronbach's α, and construct validity was tested with correlations with the accelerometry. The measurement error (SEM) and the minimal detectable change (MDC) were calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>MAL4/5-Brazil's test-retest reliability (AOU: ICC = 0.84; QOU: ICC = 0.90), inter-rater reliability (AOU: ICC = 0.83; QOU: ICC = 0.91), internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.91 and 0.95 for AOU and QOU scales, respectively), the SEM and MDC were 0.3 and 0.8 points for the AOU subscale and 0.2 and 0.5 points for the QOU subscale, respectively. The construct validity (AOU scale: <i>r</i> = 0.67; QOU scale: <i>r</i> = 0.76) was high.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Grade-4/5 Motor Activity Log-Brazil is a reliable and valid instrument for assessing the more-affected UL use of stroke patients with moderate/severe or severe UL motor impairments.</p>","PeriodicalId":50575,"journal":{"name":"Disability and Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"5357-5365"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Disability and Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2024.2305298","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study examined the clinimetrics of the Brazilian-Portuguese translation of the Grade-4/5 Motor Activity Log (MAL 4/5), which assesses everyday use of the more affected upper-limb (UL) in stroke survivors with moderate/severe or severe motor impairment.

Materials and methods: The translated MAL 4/5 was administered to 47 stroke survivors with moderate/severe or severe UL motor impairment. Accelerometers were worn on participants' wrists for five days on average prior to the first assessment. Test-retest and inter-rater reliabilities were assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), internal consistency using Cronbach's α, and construct validity was tested with correlations with the accelerometry. The measurement error (SEM) and the minimal detectable change (MDC) were calculated.

Results: MAL4/5-Brazil's test-retest reliability (AOU: ICC = 0.84; QOU: ICC = 0.90), inter-rater reliability (AOU: ICC = 0.83; QOU: ICC = 0.91), internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.91 and 0.95 for AOU and QOU scales, respectively), the SEM and MDC were 0.3 and 0.8 points for the AOU subscale and 0.2 and 0.5 points for the QOU subscale, respectively. The construct validity (AOU scale: r = 0.67; QOU scale: r = 0.76) was high.

Conclusion: Grade-4/5 Motor Activity Log-Brazil is a reliable and valid instrument for assessing the more-affected UL use of stroke patients with moderate/severe or severe UL motor impairments.

针对上肢严重受损的中风后患者的巴西 4/5 级运动活动日志:有效性、可靠性和测量误差研究。
目的:本研究考察了巴西-葡萄牙语翻译的 4/5 级运动活动日志(MAL 4/5)的临床计量学,该日志用于评估中度/重度或严重运动障碍的中风幸存者日常使用受影响较大的上肢(UL)的情况:对 47 名患有中度/重度或严重上肢运动障碍的中风幸存者进行了翻译后的 MAL 4/5。在首次评估前,参与者手腕上平均佩戴加速度计五天。使用类内相关系数(ICC)评估了测试重复可靠性和评估者之间的可靠性,使用克朗巴赫α评估了内部一致性,并通过与加速度计的相关性测试了结构效度。计算了测量误差(SEM)和最小可检测变化(MDC):结果:MAL4/5-Brazil 的测试-再测可靠性(AOU:ICC = 0.84;QOU:ICC = 0.90)、评分者间可靠性(AOU:ICC = 0.83;QOU:ICC = 0.91)、内部一致性(Cronbach's α = 0.AOU 量表和 QOU 量表的内部一致性(Cronbach's α = 0.91 和 0.95)、SEM 和 MDC 分别为 0.3 分和 0.8 分(AOU 子量表)和 0.2 分和 0.5 分(QOU 子量表)。建构效度(AOU 量表:r = 0.67;QOU 量表:r = 0.76)较高:结论:《巴西 4/5 级运动活动日志》是评估中度/重度或严重 UL 运动障碍的脑卒中患者 UL 使用情况的可靠有效工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Disability and Rehabilitation
Disability and Rehabilitation 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
9.10%
发文量
415
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Disability and Rehabilitation along with Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology are international multidisciplinary journals which seek to encourage a better understanding of all aspects of disability and to promote rehabilitation science, practice and policy aspects of the rehabilitation process.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信