Diagnostic value of cardiothoracic ratio in patients with non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy: comparison to cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging

IF 1.5 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Reghunath Anjuna MD , Simkus Paulius MD , Gutierrez Gimeno Manuel MD, PhD , Banisauskaite Audra MD , Noreikaite Jurate MD , Radike Monika MD, PhD
{"title":"Diagnostic value of cardiothoracic ratio in patients with non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy: comparison to cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging","authors":"Reghunath Anjuna MD ,&nbsp;Simkus Paulius MD ,&nbsp;Gutierrez Gimeno Manuel MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Banisauskaite Audra MD ,&nbsp;Noreikaite Jurate MD ,&nbsp;Radike Monika MD, PhD","doi":"10.1067/j.cpradiol.2024.01.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>To determine the reliability of the cardiothoracic<span> ratio (CTR) as a simple method to assess the cardiac size and function in patients with non-ischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM).</span></p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>In a sample of 91 patients (66 patients with diagnosed non-ischemic cardiomyopathy and 25 controls) we calculated the CTR on a posteroanterior chest radiograph<span> and ventricular and atrial size based on accepted cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging values. Left and right ventricular ejection fraction was also calculated. The CTR and cardiac chamber size were compared between patients with NICM and healthy individuals. The distinction between normal and increased cardiac chamber size was made using published normal CMR reference values stratified by age and gender.</span></p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>CTR values were higher in the NICM group (50.7±5.5 % Vs. 45.3±4.7 %, p&lt;0.001). Likewise, LVEDVi, LV indexed mass, LA indexed volume, LA indexed area, and RA indexed area were higher, and LVEF and RVEF were lower in patients with non-ischemic cardiomyopathy (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.05). In patients with non-ischemic cardiomyopathy, the greatest correlation between CTR and CMR values was with LVEDVi (ρ=0.4, p &lt; 0.001), LA indexed volume (ρ=0.5, p &lt; 0.001), LA indexed area (ρ=0.5, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001) and RA indexed area (ρ=0.4, p &lt; 0.001). However, the correlation strength was only moderate.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Despite patients with NICM had higher CTR values than the control group, a substantial proportion of these patients showed normal CTRs (&lt;50 %). This fact limits the usefulness of CTR to reliably predict NICM. Correlation between CTR and heart chamber dilation on CMR was only weak to moderate.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51617,"journal":{"name":"Current Problems in Diagnostic Radiology","volume":"53 3","pages":"Pages 353-358"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Problems in Diagnostic Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0363018824000100","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

To determine the reliability of the cardiothoracic ratio (CTR) as a simple method to assess the cardiac size and function in patients with non-ischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM).

Methods

In a sample of 91 patients (66 patients with diagnosed non-ischemic cardiomyopathy and 25 controls) we calculated the CTR on a posteroanterior chest radiograph and ventricular and atrial size based on accepted cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging values. Left and right ventricular ejection fraction was also calculated. The CTR and cardiac chamber size were compared between patients with NICM and healthy individuals. The distinction between normal and increased cardiac chamber size was made using published normal CMR reference values stratified by age and gender.

Results

CTR values were higher in the NICM group (50.7±5.5 % Vs. 45.3±4.7 %, p<0.001). Likewise, LVEDVi, LV indexed mass, LA indexed volume, LA indexed area, and RA indexed area were higher, and LVEF and RVEF were lower in patients with non-ischemic cardiomyopathy (p < 0.05). In patients with non-ischemic cardiomyopathy, the greatest correlation between CTR and CMR values was with LVEDVi (ρ=0.4, p < 0.001), LA indexed volume (ρ=0.5, p < 0.001), LA indexed area (ρ=0.5, p < 0.001) and RA indexed area (ρ=0.4, p < 0.001). However, the correlation strength was only moderate.

Conclusion

Despite patients with NICM had higher CTR values than the control group, a substantial proportion of these patients showed normal CTRs (<50 %). This fact limits the usefulness of CTR to reliably predict NICM. Correlation between CTR and heart chamber dilation on CMR was only weak to moderate.

非缺血性心肌病患者心胸比率的诊断价值:与心血管磁共振的比较
目的 确定心胸比(CTR)作为评估非缺血性心肌病(NICM)患者心脏大小和功能的一种简单方法的可靠性。方法 在 91 例患者(66 例确诊为非缺血性心肌病的患者和 25 例对照组)样本中,我们根据后正位胸片计算了心胸比,并根据公认的心血管磁共振(CMR)成像值计算了心室和心房的大小。还计算了左右心室射血分数。对 NICM 患者和健康人的 CTR 和心腔大小进行了比较。结果 NICM 组的 CTR 值更高(50.7±5.5 % Vs. 45.3±4.7%,p<0.001)。同样,非缺血性心肌病患者的LVEDVi、LV指数质量、LA指数体积、LA指数面积和RA指数面积较高,LVEF和RVEF较低(p<0.05)。在非缺血性心肌病患者中,CTR 和 CMR 值与 LVEDVi(ρ=0.4,p <;0.001)、LA 指数容积(ρ=0.5,p <;0.001)、LA 指数面积(ρ=0.5,p <;0.001)和 RA 指数面积(ρ=0.4,p <;0.001)的相关性最大。结论尽管 NICM 患者的 CTR 值高于对照组,但其中相当一部分患者的 CTR 显示正常(50%)。这一事实限制了 CTR 在可靠预测 NICM 方面的作用。CTR与CMR心腔扩张之间的相关性仅为微弱至中等。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Current Problems in Diagnostic Radiology
Current Problems in Diagnostic Radiology RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
113
审稿时长
46 days
期刊介绍: Current Problems in Diagnostic Radiology covers important and controversial topics in radiology. Each issue presents important viewpoints from leading radiologists. High-quality reproductions of radiographs, CT scans, MR images, and sonograms clearly depict what is being described in each article. Also included are valuable updates relevant to other areas of practice, such as medical-legal issues or archiving systems. With new multi-topic format and image-intensive style, Current Problems in Diagnostic Radiology offers an outstanding, time-saving investigation into current topics most relevant to radiologists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信