The dividing question as a hedging tool in the dialogues of the British working class

Elizaveta Alekseevna Shchegortsova
{"title":"The dividing question as a hedging tool in the dialogues of the British working class","authors":"Elizaveta Alekseevna Shchegortsova","doi":"10.25136/2409-8698.2024.1.69619","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The subject of the study is the dividing issues-hedges in the speech of the British working class. The purpose of the work is to determine the features of their functioning as a means of speech fencing (hedging). The main communicative tasks for which representatives of the British working class resort to using the structure of the dividing question in order to hedge their statements are identified: expression of opinion, criticism, statement of fact, assumption, proposal, demand, request for information and intention. A number of patterns have also been identified when using ascending or descending nuclear tones in the second half of the dividing questions used as hedges. The material of the study is the dialogues of the characters, representatives of the modern London working class, of the movie \"Sorry We Missed You\" (2019, directed by K. Loach) in the original language.  The work uses linguistic and contextual analysis in order to classify the research material. Audit and electroacoustic analysis of statements were also carried out using the Praat program. The novelty of the study lies in the choice of material and subject of the study: the film \"Sorry We Missed You\" has not been considered by linguists as a material for analyzing the rhythmic dynamics of English speech, and the features of hedging in communication of the British working class remain extremely poorly studied. The study showed that hedging, allowing communicants to maintain each other's personal boundaries, is not always a means of making a statement polite, as it is often used even in conflict situations. The emotional state of the addressee does not reduce the need to apply a speech separation strategy (including using the structure of the dividing question), but it affects its rhythmic and melodic design. Other important factors in choosing the intonation of hedges are the desire to continue or end the conversation, as well as the gender of the speaker.\n","PeriodicalId":31345,"journal":{"name":"Litera","volume":"135 36","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Litera","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25136/2409-8698.2024.1.69619","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The subject of the study is the dividing issues-hedges in the speech of the British working class. The purpose of the work is to determine the features of their functioning as a means of speech fencing (hedging). The main communicative tasks for which representatives of the British working class resort to using the structure of the dividing question in order to hedge their statements are identified: expression of opinion, criticism, statement of fact, assumption, proposal, demand, request for information and intention. A number of patterns have also been identified when using ascending or descending nuclear tones in the second half of the dividing questions used as hedges. The material of the study is the dialogues of the characters, representatives of the modern London working class, of the movie "Sorry We Missed You" (2019, directed by K. Loach) in the original language.  The work uses linguistic and contextual analysis in order to classify the research material. Audit and electroacoustic analysis of statements were also carried out using the Praat program. The novelty of the study lies in the choice of material and subject of the study: the film "Sorry We Missed You" has not been considered by linguists as a material for analyzing the rhythmic dynamics of English speech, and the features of hedging in communication of the British working class remain extremely poorly studied. The study showed that hedging, allowing communicants to maintain each other's personal boundaries, is not always a means of making a statement polite, as it is often used even in conflict situations. The emotional state of the addressee does not reduce the need to apply a speech separation strategy (including using the structure of the dividing question), but it affects its rhythmic and melodic design. Other important factors in choosing the intonation of hedges are the desire to continue or end the conversation, as well as the gender of the speaker.
英国工人阶级对话中作为对冲工具的分化问题
本研究的主题是英国工人阶级话语中的分化问题--对冲。这项工作的目的是确定其作为言语围栏(对冲)手段的功能特点。研究确定了英国工人阶级代表为对冲其言论而使用划分问题结构的主要交际任务:表达意见、批评、陈述事实、假设、建议、要求、请求提供信息和意图。在用作对冲的分句问题的后半部分使用升调或降调时,也发现了一些规律。研究材料是电影《对不起,我们错过了你》(2019 年,导演 K. Loach)中现代伦敦工人阶级代表人物的对话原文。 作品采用语言和语境分析法对研究材料进行分类。此外,还使用 Praat 程序对语句进行了审计和电声分析。该研究的新颖之处在于研究材料和研究对象的选择:语言学家尚未将电影《对不起,我们错过了你》作为分析英语语音节奏动态的材料,而对英国工人阶级交流中的对冲特点的研究也仍然极少。研究表明,对冲让交际双方保持彼此的个人界限,但它并不总是一种使语句礼貌的手段,因为它甚至在冲突情况下也经常被使用。受话人的情绪状态并不会减少采用分句策略(包括使用分句问句的结构)的必要性,但会影响其节奏和旋律的设计。选择对冲语调的其他重要因素还有继续或结束对话的愿望以及说话人的性别。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书