{"title":"Il “ragionevole accomodamento” nella giurisprudenza italiana in materia ecclesiastica*","authors":"Maria Letizia Cavuoto","doi":"10.54103/1971-8543/22277","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The “reasonable accommodation” in Italian jurisprudence in ecclesiastical matters \nABSTRACT: With judgment n. 24414/2021, the United Sections of the Supreme Court suggested “reasonable accommodation” as a key to resolving conflicts over religious symbols in public school classrooms. This approach, which is typically used to promote equality for workers with disabilities, has been applied to this dispute in a novel way. This paper intends to reconstruct the Court’s proposal of a “reasonable accommodation” model after analyzing the original features of this approach. From the investigation of nature and the application of “reasonable accommodation” in the decision of the Court, this work seeks to verify whether this model can be effectively and legally relevantly applied in the public school context. \nSOMMARIO: 1. Il crocifisso e l’inedita chiave di risoluzione dei conflitti dopo la sentenza n. 24414 delle Sezioni Unite della Corte di cassazione - 2. La natura del principio del “ragionevole accomodamento” - 3. Il “ragionevole accomodamento” come metodo “mite” - 4. Limiti e prospettive - 5. Brevi osservazioni conclusive.","PeriodicalId":516304,"journal":{"name":"Stato, Chiese e pluralismo confessionale","volume":"3 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stato, Chiese e pluralismo confessionale","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54103/1971-8543/22277","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The “reasonable accommodation” in Italian jurisprudence in ecclesiastical matters
ABSTRACT: With judgment n. 24414/2021, the United Sections of the Supreme Court suggested “reasonable accommodation” as a key to resolving conflicts over religious symbols in public school classrooms. This approach, which is typically used to promote equality for workers with disabilities, has been applied to this dispute in a novel way. This paper intends to reconstruct the Court’s proposal of a “reasonable accommodation” model after analyzing the original features of this approach. From the investigation of nature and the application of “reasonable accommodation” in the decision of the Court, this work seeks to verify whether this model can be effectively and legally relevantly applied in the public school context.
SOMMARIO: 1. Il crocifisso e l’inedita chiave di risoluzione dei conflitti dopo la sentenza n. 24414 delle Sezioni Unite della Corte di cassazione - 2. La natura del principio del “ragionevole accomodamento” - 3. Il “ragionevole accomodamento” come metodo “mite” - 4. Limiti e prospettive - 5. Brevi osservazioni conclusive.
意大利教会事务判例中的 "合理便利 ABSTRACT: 最高法院联合庭在第 24414/2021 号判决中提出,"合理便利 "是解决公立学校教室中宗教标志冲突的关键。这一方法通常用于促进残疾工人的平等,却以一种新颖的方式被应用于这一争端。本文拟在分析这一方法的原始特征后,重构法院提出的 "合理便利 "模式。通过对 "合理便利 "的性质和在法院判决中的应用的研究,本文试图验证这一模式是否能在公立学校中得到有效且具有法律意义的应用。原文:1.Il crocifisso e l'inedita chiave di risoluzione dei conflitti dopo la sentenza n. 24414 delle Sezioni Unite della Corte di cassazione - 2. La natura del principio del "ragionevole accomodamento" - 3. Il "ragionevole accomodamento" come metodo "mite" - 4. Limiti e prospettive - 5.Limiti e prospettive - 5.Brevi osservazioni conclusive.