A Comparative Multi-Zoo Survey Investigating the Housing and Husbandry of Callimico goeldii

Amanda Bartlett, J. Brereton, M. Freeman
{"title":"A Comparative Multi-Zoo Survey Investigating the Housing and Husbandry of Callimico goeldii","authors":"Amanda Bartlett, J. Brereton, M. Freeman","doi":"10.3390/jzbg5010005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Callimico (Callimico goeldii) are members of the callitrichid family, and a species of conservation concern managed within the European Association of Zoos and Aquaria (EAZA) ex situ program. They benefit from extensive ‘Best Practice’ guidelines developed by the Callitrichid Taxon Advisory Group (TAG), but there are gaps in species-specific knowledge and captive management research. A survey was created to understand and evaluate current housing and husbandry within EAZA collections holding callimico. The questionnaire allowed collation of details including enclosure size along with prevalence of mixed species exhibits, use of UV-B lighting, enclosure complexity and enrichment routines. Responding collections represented 44% of the current callimico holders, with the results allowing comparative analysis of current practice against the guidelines and considering previous research. Significant positive differences were discovered between minimum recommended enclosure dimensions, including total enclosure volume, 32 m3 (p < 0.001, median = 100) and height, 2.5 m (p < 0.001, median = 3) versus EAZA’s minimum recommended dimensions. Encouragingly, no significant difference in complexity was found between on and off exhibit housing, but the results suggest that being housed in a mixed species exhibit offers a more complex environment for callimico (W = 405.5, p < 0.005). The responses revealed overall good practice, although a disparity was noted in the provision of UV-B lighting and the prevalence of enrichment. Observational research focusing on spatial use, preference and behavior is recommended to complement husbandry guidelines. Reference of the survey findings to welfare indicators could determine the effect of current housing and husbandry on callimico welfare.","PeriodicalId":497685,"journal":{"name":"Journal of zoological and botanical gardens","volume":"43 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of zoological and botanical gardens","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jzbg5010005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Callimico (Callimico goeldii) are members of the callitrichid family, and a species of conservation concern managed within the European Association of Zoos and Aquaria (EAZA) ex situ program. They benefit from extensive ‘Best Practice’ guidelines developed by the Callitrichid Taxon Advisory Group (TAG), but there are gaps in species-specific knowledge and captive management research. A survey was created to understand and evaluate current housing and husbandry within EAZA collections holding callimico. The questionnaire allowed collation of details including enclosure size along with prevalence of mixed species exhibits, use of UV-B lighting, enclosure complexity and enrichment routines. Responding collections represented 44% of the current callimico holders, with the results allowing comparative analysis of current practice against the guidelines and considering previous research. Significant positive differences were discovered between minimum recommended enclosure dimensions, including total enclosure volume, 32 m3 (p < 0.001, median = 100) and height, 2.5 m (p < 0.001, median = 3) versus EAZA’s minimum recommended dimensions. Encouragingly, no significant difference in complexity was found between on and off exhibit housing, but the results suggest that being housed in a mixed species exhibit offers a more complex environment for callimico (W = 405.5, p < 0.005). The responses revealed overall good practice, although a disparity was noted in the provision of UV-B lighting and the prevalence of enrichment. Observational research focusing on spatial use, preference and behavior is recommended to complement husbandry guidelines. Reference of the survey findings to welfare indicators could determine the effect of current housing and husbandry on callimico welfare.
多动物园比较调查:调查鹅掌楸的栖息地和饲养方式
鹅喉蛙(Callimico goeldii)是鹅喉蛙科鹅喉蛙属的成员,也是欧洲动物园和水族馆协会(EAZA)异地项目管理的重点保护物种。它们受益于胼胝体分类咨询小组(TAG)制定的大量 "最佳实践 "指南,但在物种特定知识和人工饲养管理研究方面仍存在差距。为了了解和评估EAZA收藏的胼胝体动物目前的饲养情况,我们进行了一项调查。通过问卷调查,收集了包括圈舍大小、混合物种展示的普遍程度、UV-B照明的使用、圈舍的复杂程度和强化程序等详细信息。作出答复的饲养场占目前马蹄莲饲养场的 44%,其结果有助于根据指南和以前的研究对目前的做法进行比较分析。发现最低推荐围栏尺寸(包括围栏总容积 32 立方米(p < 0.001,中位数 = 100)和高度 2.5 米(p < 0.001,中位数 = 3))与 EAZA 最低推荐尺寸之间存在显著正差异。令人鼓舞的是,在展区内和展区外饲养的茧尾蜥在复杂性方面没有发现明显差异,但结果表明,在混合物种展区饲养的茧尾蜥所处的环境更为复杂(W = 405.5,p < 0.005)。调查结果显示,尽管在提供紫外线-B 照明和丰富环境方面存在差异,但总体做法良好。建议开展以空间利用、偏好和行为为重点的观察研究,以补充饲养指南。将调查结果与福利指标相结合,可以确定目前的饲养方式对马蹄莲福利的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信