Study on critical crack length of wet-sieved and full-graded concrete under mode I loading

IF 1.8 4区 工程技术 Q3 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY
Xingyu Zheng, Zhimin Wu, Mengdi Jia
{"title":"Study on critical crack length of wet-sieved and full-graded concrete under mode I loading","authors":"Xingyu Zheng, Zhimin Wu, Mengdi Jia","doi":"10.1680/jmacr.23.00059","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study quantitatively compares the critical crack lengths of wet-sieved and full-graded concrete obtained from experimental measurements, the numerical simulation, with that from the analytical solution based on the linear elastic fracture mechanics formula (LEFM). The experiments are conducted on wedge-splitting specimens with depths from 200 mm to 1500 mm and a maximum aggregate size of 150 mm. Strain gauges and clip gauges are pasted and mounted along the direction of crack growth to measure the critical crack length. The numerical and analytical methods are used to calculate the critical crack length. The average relative error between the analytical calculations and measurements is still 14%, even if the specimen depth increases to 1500 mm. Additionally, the effective fracture toughness is calculated by combining the peak load and critical crack length, resulting in an average relative error of 17%. These results indicate that the existing analytical method is inadequate for determining the critical crack length. Consequently, a modified analytical method is adopted, utilizing the 95% peak load in the post-peak region and the corresponding crack mouth opening displacement (CMOD), which provides calculated results that agree well with experimental data. Furthermore, the effective fracture toughness can be reasonably derived using the critical crack lengths from the modified analytical method.","PeriodicalId":18113,"journal":{"name":"Magazine of Concrete Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Magazine of Concrete Research","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1680/jmacr.23.00059","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study quantitatively compares the critical crack lengths of wet-sieved and full-graded concrete obtained from experimental measurements, the numerical simulation, with that from the analytical solution based on the linear elastic fracture mechanics formula (LEFM). The experiments are conducted on wedge-splitting specimens with depths from 200 mm to 1500 mm and a maximum aggregate size of 150 mm. Strain gauges and clip gauges are pasted and mounted along the direction of crack growth to measure the critical crack length. The numerical and analytical methods are used to calculate the critical crack length. The average relative error between the analytical calculations and measurements is still 14%, even if the specimen depth increases to 1500 mm. Additionally, the effective fracture toughness is calculated by combining the peak load and critical crack length, resulting in an average relative error of 17%. These results indicate that the existing analytical method is inadequate for determining the critical crack length. Consequently, a modified analytical method is adopted, utilizing the 95% peak load in the post-peak region and the corresponding crack mouth opening displacement (CMOD), which provides calculated results that agree well with experimental data. Furthermore, the effective fracture toughness can be reasonably derived using the critical crack lengths from the modified analytical method.
模式 I 荷载下湿吸水混凝土和满级配混凝土临界裂缝长度研究
本研究定量比较了通过实验测量、数值模拟和基于线性弹性断裂力学公式(LEFM)的分析求解得到的湿陷性混凝土和满级配混凝土的临界裂缝长度。实验在深度为 200 毫米至 1500 毫米、最大骨料粒径为 150 毫米的楔形劈裂试件上进行。沿裂纹生长方向粘贴和安装应变片和夹片,以测量临界裂纹长度。采用数值和分析方法计算临界裂缝长度。即使试样深度增加到 1500 毫米,分析计算和测量之间的平均相对误差仍为 14%。此外,通过结合峰值载荷和临界裂纹长度计算有效断裂韧性,得出的平均相对误差为 17%。这些结果表明,现有的分析方法不足以确定临界裂纹长度。因此,我们采用了一种改进的分析方法,利用峰值后区域 95% 的峰值载荷和相应的裂缝口张开位移 (CMOD),计算结果与实验数据非常吻合。此外,利用修改后的分析方法得出的临界裂缝长度,可以合理地推导出有效断裂韧性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Magazine of Concrete Research
Magazine of Concrete Research 工程技术-材料科学:综合
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
11.10%
发文量
102
审稿时长
5 months
期刊介绍: For concrete and other cementitious derivatives to be developed further, we need to understand the use of alternative hydraulically active materials used in combination with plain Portland Cement, sustainability and durability issues. Both fundamental and best practice issues need to be addressed. Magazine of Concrete Research covers every aspect of concrete manufacture and behaviour from performance and evaluation of constituent materials to mix design, testing, durability, structural analysis and composite construction.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信