{"title":"Agrarian Conflict in Tanah Istimewa: Resolution of Street Vendors' Conflict Over the Use of Sultan Ground in the Jalan Perwakilan Area","authors":"Edwan Nizar Wirayuda, David Efendi","doi":"10.54783/ijsoc.v6i1.1026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this research is to determine efforts to resolve street vendors' conflicts regarding the use of Sultan Ground in the Jalan Representative area. The method in this research uses a qualitative case study approach as a method to understand the significance of social problems. The data collection technique in this research uses primary data involving sources from the Yogyakarta City Land and Spatial Planning Service, the Kraton Panitikismo, the Yogyakarta Legal Aid Institute, the Representative Communication and Coordination Forum, and the DIY Land Care Forum for the sake of the Republic of Indonesia. Meanwhile, secondary data uses relevant research, documents, and mass media. The collected data is analyzed interactively with three stages of analysis, including: First, data reduction, namely collecting data. Second, data presentation, namely describing research data that has been successfully reduced. Third, drawing conclusions. The results of this research show that the indicators for conflict de-escalation, conflict negotiation, conflict resolution, and conflict reconciliation are not going well because each indicator can be concluded not to have precise results and could even have the potential to give rise to further conflict. The absence of space for dialogue means that traders are not able to argue and try to reach an agreement that can be agreed to by both parties. Apart from that, there was no further dialogue from the government or producers with the traders after the relocation.","PeriodicalId":506437,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Science and Society","volume":"57 25","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Science and Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54783/ijsoc.v6i1.1026","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The aim of this research is to determine efforts to resolve street vendors' conflicts regarding the use of Sultan Ground in the Jalan Representative area. The method in this research uses a qualitative case study approach as a method to understand the significance of social problems. The data collection technique in this research uses primary data involving sources from the Yogyakarta City Land and Spatial Planning Service, the Kraton Panitikismo, the Yogyakarta Legal Aid Institute, the Representative Communication and Coordination Forum, and the DIY Land Care Forum for the sake of the Republic of Indonesia. Meanwhile, secondary data uses relevant research, documents, and mass media. The collected data is analyzed interactively with three stages of analysis, including: First, data reduction, namely collecting data. Second, data presentation, namely describing research data that has been successfully reduced. Third, drawing conclusions. The results of this research show that the indicators for conflict de-escalation, conflict negotiation, conflict resolution, and conflict reconciliation are not going well because each indicator can be concluded not to have precise results and could even have the potential to give rise to further conflict. The absence of space for dialogue means that traders are not able to argue and try to reach an agreement that can be agreed to by both parties. Apart from that, there was no further dialogue from the government or producers with the traders after the relocation.
Tanah Istimewa 的土地冲突:解决街头小贩因使用 Jalan Perwakilan 地区苏丹土地而产生的冲突
本研究的目的是确定为解决 Jalan Representative 地区苏丹地面使用方面的街头小贩冲突所做的努力。本研究采用定性个案研究的方法来了解社会问题的重要性。本研究的数据收集技术使用的一手数据来源于日惹市土地和空间规划局、Kraton Panitikismo、日惹法律援助机构、代表交流与协调论坛和印度尼西亚共和国DIY土地关怀论坛。同时,二手数据使用了相关研究、文件和大众媒体。对收集到的数据进行交互式分析,包括三个分析阶段:第一,数据还原,即收集数据。第二,数据展示,即描述已成功缩减的研究数据。第三,得出结论。研究结果表明,冲突缓和、冲突谈判、冲突解决、冲突和解的指标进展并不顺利,因为每一项指标都可以断定没有确切的结果,甚至有可能引发进一步的冲突。对话空间的缺失意味着交易商无法进行辩论,也无法努力达成双方都能同意的协议。除此之外,在搬迁之后,政府或生产商也没有与贸易商进行进一步的对话。