How to Respond to Racist Patients: Recommendations from a Literature Review

Benjamin Caplan, Jocelyn Mitchell-Williams
{"title":"How to Respond to Racist Patients: Recommendations from a Literature Review","authors":"Benjamin Caplan, Jocelyn Mitchell-Williams","doi":"10.31986/issn.2578.3343_vol5iss1.9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"amed. Investigation of published recommendations for handling these situations can give victims, peers, and institutions the tools necessary to prepare, protect, and support providers through these challenging encounters.\n\nMethods: This paper is a literature review. For inclusion in this review, studies must have met the criteria of providing recommendations for healthcare providers or institutions on how to deal with racist patients. Excluded articles did not include recommendations on how to handle such situations or did not otherwise meet inclusion criteria. PubMed Medline was searched in January 2022 using a combination of the following keywords and associated MeSH terms: “Racism” AND “Physician-Patient relations”. The resulted articles then underwent forward and backward citation searching. A total of 44 articles were included after evaluation of 272 articles via this process.\n\nResults: For the affected individual, recommended responses include addressing the comment firmly and directly in real time, setting boundaries and behavior expectation, reporting the incident to supervisors and to the hospital, and seeking support from peers and/or professionals. At the peer level, core practices are supporting the victim, addressing the patient if necessary, debriefing with the victim and team, and checking-in with the victim in the following days. At the institution level, core practices are enacting reporting system and tracking incidents, developing specific policies and procedures about biased patients, and training staff with focused antibias and antidiscrimination sessions.\n\nDiscussion: There are steps to be taken at every level to create a supportive and inclusive practice that protects providers against racist patients. One limitation of this study was that it was not a systematic review so there may be other recommendations published that are not reflected here.","PeriodicalId":415794,"journal":{"name":"The Cooper Rowan Medical Journal","volume":"44 21","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Cooper Rowan Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31986/issn.2578.3343_vol5iss1.9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

amed. Investigation of published recommendations for handling these situations can give victims, peers, and institutions the tools necessary to prepare, protect, and support providers through these challenging encounters. Methods: This paper is a literature review. For inclusion in this review, studies must have met the criteria of providing recommendations for healthcare providers or institutions on how to deal with racist patients. Excluded articles did not include recommendations on how to handle such situations or did not otherwise meet inclusion criteria. PubMed Medline was searched in January 2022 using a combination of the following keywords and associated MeSH terms: “Racism” AND “Physician-Patient relations”. The resulted articles then underwent forward and backward citation searching. A total of 44 articles were included after evaluation of 272 articles via this process. Results: For the affected individual, recommended responses include addressing the comment firmly and directly in real time, setting boundaries and behavior expectation, reporting the incident to supervisors and to the hospital, and seeking support from peers and/or professionals. At the peer level, core practices are supporting the victim, addressing the patient if necessary, debriefing with the victim and team, and checking-in with the victim in the following days. At the institution level, core practices are enacting reporting system and tracking incidents, developing specific policies and procedures about biased patients, and training staff with focused antibias and antidiscrimination sessions. Discussion: There are steps to be taken at every level to create a supportive and inclusive practice that protects providers against racist patients. One limitation of this study was that it was not a systematic review so there may be other recommendations published that are not reflected here.
如何应对种族主义患者:文献综述中的建议
目的对已公布的处理这些情况的建议进行调查,可以为受害者、同行和机构提供必要的工具,使其做好准备,保护和支持服务提供者度过这些具有挑战性的遭遇:本文是一篇文献综述。纳入本综述的研究必须符合为医疗服务提供者或机构提供如何处理种族主义患者的建议的标准。被排除的文章不包括如何处理此类情况的建议,或不符合纳入标准。2022 年 1 月,使用以下关键词和相关的 MeSH 术语对 PubMed Medline 进行了检索:"种族主义 "和 "医患关系"。然后对检索到的文章进行正向和反向引文检索。通过这一过程对 272 篇文章进行评估后,共有 44 篇文章被收录:对于受影响的个人,建议采取的应对措施包括:坚决、直接地实时处理评论意见,设定界限和行为期望,向主管和医院报告事件,以及寻求同行和/或专业人士的支持。在同侪层面,核心做法是支持受害者,必要时解决患者问题,向受害者和团队汇报情况,并在接下来的日子里与受害者保持联系。在机构层面,核心做法是制定报告制度和跟踪事件,制定关于有偏见患者的具体政策和程序,并通过有针对性的反偏见和反歧视课程对员工进行培训:讨论:在各个层面都需要采取一些措施来创建一种支持性和包容性的做法,以保护医疗服务提供者免受种族主义患者的侵害。这项研究的局限性之一是它不是一项系统性综述,因此可能还有其他已发表的建议没有在此反映出来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信