Protocol in Civil Procedure: Some Aspects of Judicial Communication and the Principle of Immediacy

A. D. Erzin
{"title":"Protocol in Civil Procedure: Some Aspects of Judicial Communication and the Principle of Immediacy","authors":"A. D. Erzin","doi":"10.17803/2311-5998.2023.110.10.207-213","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article reviews the court records as a tool to ensure the fixation of communication between the court and the participants of the process, and also defines its role in the appeal court proceedings. The author analyzes the existing approaches to the combination of recording facilities and criticizes the point of view on the use of audio-recording as the main way to record the court proceedings. Despite the identified disadvantages of audiorecording, the author concludes that it is impossible to return completely to the written record of the court proceedings and as a solution to overcome the shortcomings proposes the use of speech recognition technology to prepare a text record of the court session. According to the author, such a reformation of the civil process will reduce the burden on the court system employees and, at the same time, ensure the implementation of the principle of immediacy in the proceedings in the court of appeals.","PeriodicalId":238867,"journal":{"name":"Courier of Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL))","volume":"90 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Courier of Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL))","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17803/2311-5998.2023.110.10.207-213","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article reviews the court records as a tool to ensure the fixation of communication between the court and the participants of the process, and also defines its role in the appeal court proceedings. The author analyzes the existing approaches to the combination of recording facilities and criticizes the point of view on the use of audio-recording as the main way to record the court proceedings. Despite the identified disadvantages of audiorecording, the author concludes that it is impossible to return completely to the written record of the court proceedings and as a solution to overcome the shortcomings proposes the use of speech recognition technology to prepare a text record of the court session. According to the author, such a reformation of the civil process will reduce the burden on the court system employees and, at the same time, ensure the implementation of the principle of immediacy in the proceedings in the court of appeals.
民事诉讼程序中的协议:司法交流的某些方面与即时性原则
文章回顾了法院记录作为确保法院与诉讼参与人之间沟通固定化的工具,并界定了其在上诉法院诉讼程序中的作用。作者分析了现有的记录设施组合方法,并批评了将录音作为法庭诉讼记录主要方式的观点。尽管指出了录音的缺点,但作者认为不可能完全恢复法庭诉讼的书面记录,作为克服缺点的解决方案,作者建议使用语音识别技术编写法庭开庭的文字记录。提交人认为,民事诉讼程序的这种改革将减轻法院系统工作人员的负担,同时确保在上诉法院的诉讼程序中落实即时性原则。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信