{"title":"FDI, Foreign Debt, and Economic Growth: The South Asian Perspective (1980-2020)","authors":"Rizwan Akhtar Jamsheed","doi":"10.52459/jowett37270124","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The present study examines the intricate relationship between foreign direct investment (FDI), foreign debt, and economic growth over the period of 1980 to 2020 in the following countries: India, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh, Nepal, Maldives, and Bhutan. The analysis utilizes data obtained from the World Bank, with productive projects, improved technology and expertise, technological transfer, foreign direct investment (FDI), export, import, and productive projects serving as independent variables. GDP growth is considered as the dependent variable. The model is subjected to rigorous testing procedures, which include the Fisher-Type ADF (for panel unit root), co-integration tests, histogram-based normality assessment, White test for heteroscedasticity, VIF (variance inflation factor) test for multicollinearity, and F-test for parameter significance. These procedures are implemented to ensure the model's robustness. Subsequent analysis is guided by the Hausman test's preference for the Fixed Effects (FE) model over the Random Effects (RE) model. It is worth noting that in both the FE and RE models, a negative correlation is observed between foreign debt and economic growth. The foreign direct investment (FDI) growth rate is inversely proportional to the growth rate of economic output (0.025 percent) and foreign debt (0.117 percent), according to the FE model. The interdependence of foreign direct investment (FDI) and foreign debt underscores the criticality for developing countries to effectively manage their foreign debt while facilitating FDI inflow. The research emphasizes that policy frameworks in these nations must reduce foreign debt in order to create an environment that is favorable for greater foreign direct investment.","PeriodicalId":345637,"journal":{"name":"Journal of World Economy: Transformations & Transitions","volume":"31 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of World Economy: Transformations & Transitions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52459/jowett37270124","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The present study examines the intricate relationship between foreign direct investment (FDI), foreign debt, and economic growth over the period of 1980 to 2020 in the following countries: India, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh, Nepal, Maldives, and Bhutan. The analysis utilizes data obtained from the World Bank, with productive projects, improved technology and expertise, technological transfer, foreign direct investment (FDI), export, import, and productive projects serving as independent variables. GDP growth is considered as the dependent variable. The model is subjected to rigorous testing procedures, which include the Fisher-Type ADF (for panel unit root), co-integration tests, histogram-based normality assessment, White test for heteroscedasticity, VIF (variance inflation factor) test for multicollinearity, and F-test for parameter significance. These procedures are implemented to ensure the model's robustness. Subsequent analysis is guided by the Hausman test's preference for the Fixed Effects (FE) model over the Random Effects (RE) model. It is worth noting that in both the FE and RE models, a negative correlation is observed between foreign debt and economic growth. The foreign direct investment (FDI) growth rate is inversely proportional to the growth rate of economic output (0.025 percent) and foreign debt (0.117 percent), according to the FE model. The interdependence of foreign direct investment (FDI) and foreign debt underscores the criticality for developing countries to effectively manage their foreign debt while facilitating FDI inflow. The research emphasizes that policy frameworks in these nations must reduce foreign debt in order to create an environment that is favorable for greater foreign direct investment.
本研究探讨了 1980 年至 2020 年期间下列国家的外国直接投资(FDI)、外债和经济增长之间错综复杂的关系:印度、巴基斯坦、斯里兰卡、孟加拉国、尼泊尔、马尔代夫和不丹:印度、巴基斯坦、斯里兰卡、孟加拉国、尼泊尔、马尔代夫和不丹。分析利用世界银行提供的数据,以生产性项目、改进的技术和专业知识、技术转让、外国直接投资(FDI)、出口、进口和生产性项目作为自变量。国内生产总值增长被视为因变量。该模型经过了严格的检验程序,包括费雪式 ADF(面板单位根)、协整检验、基于直方图的正态性评估、异方差怀特检验、多重共线性 VIF(方差膨胀因子)检验和参数显著性 F 检验。实施这些程序是为了确保模型的稳健性。随后的分析以豪斯曼检验法为指导,即固定效应(FE)模型优于随机效应(RE)模型。值得注意的是,在 FE 和 RE 模型中,外债与经济增长之间都存在负相关关系。根据 FE 模型,外国直接投资(FDI)增长率与经济产出增长率(0.025%)和外债增长率(0.117%)成反比。外国直接投资(FDI)与外债的相互依存关系凸显了发展中国家在促进外国直接投资流入的同时有效管理外债的重要性。研究强调,这些国家的政策框架必须减少外债,以创造有利于增加外国直接投资的环境。