Analisis Perbandingan antara PP No. 99 Tahun 2012 dengan Permenkumham No. 07 Tahun 2022 Tentang Aturan atau Syarat Remisi terhadap Koruptor di Indonesia

AHKAM Pub Date : 2024-01-15 DOI:10.58578/ahkam.v3i1.2576
Ela Puspita, Fahudi Fahudi, Rasmah Rasmah
{"title":"Analisis Perbandingan antara PP No. 99 Tahun 2012 dengan Permenkumham No. 07 Tahun 2022 Tentang Aturan atau Syarat Remisi terhadap Koruptor di Indonesia","authors":"Ela Puspita, Fahudi Fahudi, Rasmah Rasmah","doi":"10.58578/ahkam.v3i1.2576","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Corruption has long been a serious problem in Indonesia. To fight corruption and enforce the law, the government has issued several regulations governing remission of corruptors. Two regulations that have had a significant impact in this regard are Presidential Regulation Number 99 of 2012 and Minister of Law and Human Rights Regulation Number 7 of 2022. To combat rampant corruption, the government has taken various steps, one of which is by implementing remission rules for corruptors. In this context, a comparative analysis between two important regulations is very relevant, namely Presidential Regulation Number 99 of 2012 and Regulation of the Minister of Law and Human Rights Number 7 of 2022 concerning Rules or Provisions for Remission of Corruptors in Indonesia. Through an objective and critical approach, this journal will present a comprehensive analysis regarding the comparison between the two regulations. In analyzing it, we will look at important aspects such as the criteria for remission recipients, the requirements that must be met, as well as the social and legal impacts of implementing these regulations. This study uses a normative juridical approach, which examines the problem based on the applicable laws and regulations regarding the rules or conditions for remission of corruptors in Indonesia. Increasing these conditions aims to provide stricter sanctions against perpetrators of corruption. This latest regulation provides stricter and stricter sanctions against corruptors, with additional requirements such as payment of fines and compensation, as well as recovery of assets obtained illegally. This is expected to provide a deterrent effect on perpetrators of corruption and strengthen law enforcement in Indonesia.","PeriodicalId":504694,"journal":{"name":"AHKAM","volume":"5 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AHKAM","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.58578/ahkam.v3i1.2576","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Corruption has long been a serious problem in Indonesia. To fight corruption and enforce the law, the government has issued several regulations governing remission of corruptors. Two regulations that have had a significant impact in this regard are Presidential Regulation Number 99 of 2012 and Minister of Law and Human Rights Regulation Number 7 of 2022. To combat rampant corruption, the government has taken various steps, one of which is by implementing remission rules for corruptors. In this context, a comparative analysis between two important regulations is very relevant, namely Presidential Regulation Number 99 of 2012 and Regulation of the Minister of Law and Human Rights Number 7 of 2022 concerning Rules or Provisions for Remission of Corruptors in Indonesia. Through an objective and critical approach, this journal will present a comprehensive analysis regarding the comparison between the two regulations. In analyzing it, we will look at important aspects such as the criteria for remission recipients, the requirements that must be met, as well as the social and legal impacts of implementing these regulations. This study uses a normative juridical approach, which examines the problem based on the applicable laws and regulations regarding the rules or conditions for remission of corruptors in Indonesia. Increasing these conditions aims to provide stricter sanctions against perpetrators of corruption. This latest regulation provides stricter and stricter sanctions against corruptors, with additional requirements such as payment of fines and compensation, as well as recovery of assets obtained illegally. This is expected to provide a deterrent effect on perpetrators of corruption and strengthen law enforcement in Indonesia.
2012 年第 99 号 PP 与 2022 年第 07 号 Permenkumham 关于印度尼西亚腐败分子减刑规则或条件的比较分析
长期以来,腐败一直是印度尼西亚的一个严重问题。为了打击腐败和执行法律,政府颁布了多项有关减免腐败分子的法规。在这方面产生重大影响的两项法规是 2012 年第 99 号总统法规和 2022 年第 7 号法律和人权部长法规。为了打击猖獗的腐败现象,政府采取了各种措施,其中之一就是对腐败分子实施减刑规定。在此背景下,对两项重要法规(即 2012 年第 99 号总统条例和 2022 年第 7 号法律和人权部长条例,涉及印度尼西亚腐败分子减刑规则或规定)进行比较分析非常有意义。通过客观和批判的方法,本期刊将对这两项法规之间的比较进行全面分析。在分析过程中,我们将关注一些重要方面,如减免对象的标准、必须满足的要求以及实施这些法规的社会和法律影响。本研究采用规范法学方法,根据印尼适用的法律法规中有关贪污者减刑的规则或条件来研究问题。增加这些条件的目的是对腐败分子进行更严厉的制裁。这项最新法规对腐败分子规定了更严格、更严厉的制裁,增加了支付罚款和赔偿以及追回非法所得资产等要求。预计这将对腐败分子起到威慑作用,并加强印度尼西亚的执法力度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信