Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) and meditation in the treatment of persistent low back pain: Interventional Study

R. Mahendra Kumar, Kumbar Rajeshwari, S. Sandeep, B. S. Sudarshan, B. K. Rakshith
{"title":"Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) and meditation in the treatment of persistent low back pain: Interventional Study","authors":"R. Mahendra Kumar, Kumbar Rajeshwari, S. Sandeep, B. S. Sudarshan, B. K. Rakshith","doi":"10.22270/jddt.v14i1.6186","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To compare the effect of both CBT and Meditation in chronic lower back pain patients. \nMethod: Participants fulfilling the exclusion and inclusion criteria and who are between the age group of 35-50 years with CLBP were included.  Numerical pain rating scale and Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MOCA) was used for the participant selection. The participants were further divided into three groups and 4-week intervention of conventional physiotherapeutic exercise, meditation and CBT, was given to the participants. Numerical Pain Rating Scale and Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire were used as outcome measures. \nResults: 40 chronic back pain patients were enrolled and randomized. All enrolled participants completed baseline tests, providing cross-sectional data for this study. Simple randomization allocated 14 patients to the control group and 13 patients each to Experimental Group 1 and Experimental Group 2. Significant within-group improvements occurred on the Numerical Rating Scale and Oswestry scores between baseline and final visits for all groups. However, the experimental groups showed significantly greater decreases in pain intensity versus controls, evidenced by reduced mean Numerical Rating Scale and Oswestry scores at follow-up. One-way ANOVA and Welch tests revealed significantly reduced Numerical Rating Scale and Oswestry scores after treatment across groups. Both tests yielded statistically significant p-values <0.01. \nConclusion: The findings show that meditation and cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) are beneficial in reducing pain. As a result, for patients with persistent low back pain, taking into consideration these two treatment techniques is critical. \nKeywords: Cognitive Behavioural Therapy, Chronic Pain, Oswestry Questionnaire","PeriodicalId":506928,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Drug Delivery and Therapeutics","volume":"17 19","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Drug Delivery and Therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22270/jddt.v14i1.6186","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To compare the effect of both CBT and Meditation in chronic lower back pain patients. Method: Participants fulfilling the exclusion and inclusion criteria and who are between the age group of 35-50 years with CLBP were included.  Numerical pain rating scale and Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MOCA) was used for the participant selection. The participants were further divided into three groups and 4-week intervention of conventional physiotherapeutic exercise, meditation and CBT, was given to the participants. Numerical Pain Rating Scale and Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire were used as outcome measures. Results: 40 chronic back pain patients were enrolled and randomized. All enrolled participants completed baseline tests, providing cross-sectional data for this study. Simple randomization allocated 14 patients to the control group and 13 patients each to Experimental Group 1 and Experimental Group 2. Significant within-group improvements occurred on the Numerical Rating Scale and Oswestry scores between baseline and final visits for all groups. However, the experimental groups showed significantly greater decreases in pain intensity versus controls, evidenced by reduced mean Numerical Rating Scale and Oswestry scores at follow-up. One-way ANOVA and Welch tests revealed significantly reduced Numerical Rating Scale and Oswestry scores after treatment across groups. Both tests yielded statistically significant p-values <0.01. Conclusion: The findings show that meditation and cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) are beneficial in reducing pain. As a result, for patients with persistent low back pain, taking into consideration these two treatment techniques is critical. Keywords: Cognitive Behavioural Therapy, Chronic Pain, Oswestry Questionnaire
治疗持续性腰背痛的认知行为疗法(CBT)和冥想:干预研究
目的比较 CBT 和冥想疗法对慢性下背痛患者的疗效。方法:纳入符合排除和纳入标准且年龄在 35-50 岁之间的慢性下背痛患者。 在选择受试者时使用了疼痛数字评分量表和蒙特利尔认知评估(MOCA)。参与者被分为三组,分别接受为期 4 周的传统物理治疗运动、冥想和 CBT 干预。采用数字疼痛评分量表和 Oswestry 腰痛残疾问卷作为结果测量。结果40 名慢性背痛患者被随机选中。所有入选者都完成了基线测试,为本研究提供了横断面数据。简单随机分配法将 14 名患者分配到对照组,将 13 名患者分别分配到实验组 1 和实验组 2。 从基线到最终访问期间,各组的数值评定量表和 Oswestry 评分均有显著的组内改善。然而,与对照组相比,实验组的疼痛强度明显降低,这体现在随访时数字评定量表和 Oswestry 评分的平均值降低。单因子方差分析和韦尔奇检验显示,各组治疗后的数字评分量表和 Oswestry 评分均明显降低。这两项测试的 P 值均小于 0.01,具有统计学意义。结论研究结果表明,冥想和认知行为疗法(CBT)有利于减轻疼痛。因此,对于顽固性腰背痛患者来说,考虑这两种治疗方法至关重要。关键词:认知行为疗法认知行为疗法 慢性疼痛 奥斯威斯特里问卷调查
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信