Validation of a tailored gravity field model for precise quasigeoid modelling over selected sites in Cameroon and South Africa

IF 1.2 Q4 REMOTE SENSING
P. Odera, O. I. Apeh, L. Yap, Matthews Siphiwe Mphuthi
{"title":"Validation of a tailored gravity field model for precise quasigeoid modelling over selected sites in Cameroon and South Africa","authors":"P. Odera, O. I. Apeh, L. Yap, Matthews Siphiwe Mphuthi","doi":"10.1515/jag-2023-0095","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n In this study, a tailored gravity-field model is developed to fit and recover local terrestrial gravity data by integrating gravity from global gravity-field models, residual gravity derived from topographic data and observed terrestrial gravity over two study sites in Africa (Cameroon and South Africa). During the modelling phase, two-thirds of the terrestrial gravity data is utilised, reserving the remaining one-third for validation purposes. Additionally, an independent validation is conducted by comparing computed quasigeoid models (derived from tailored gravity data) with height anomalies from GPS/levelling data over the two study sites. The accuracy of the tailored gravity model in reproducing observed gravity data is noteworthy, with a ±8.9 mGal accuracy for the study site in South Africa at 2867 test points and a ±10.4 mGal accuracy for the study site in Cameroon at 637 test points. Comparing height anomalies from GPS/levelling with the SATGQG quasigeoid model (developed from tailored gravity data) and the recent CDSM09A quasigeoid model at 11 GPS/levelling data points reveals comparable accuracies of ±0.10 m and ±0.05 m, for SATGQG and CDSM09A, respectively for the site in South Africa. For the Cameroon site, the differences between height anomalies from GPS/levelling and the CTGQG quasigeoid model (developed from tailored gravity data), along with the recent CGM20 quasigeoid model at 38 GPS/levelling data points, show practically equal accuracies of ±0.15 m for CTGQG and ±0.11 m for CGM20. These findings underscore the potential of tailored gravity-field model in developing accurate quasigeoid models, particularly in regions with limited gravity data coverage. This approach holds promise for gravity recovery and precise geoid modelling in developing countries and regions with insufficient coverage of terrestrial gravity data.","PeriodicalId":45494,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Geodesy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Geodesy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/jag-2023-0095","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"REMOTE SENSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this study, a tailored gravity-field model is developed to fit and recover local terrestrial gravity data by integrating gravity from global gravity-field models, residual gravity derived from topographic data and observed terrestrial gravity over two study sites in Africa (Cameroon and South Africa). During the modelling phase, two-thirds of the terrestrial gravity data is utilised, reserving the remaining one-third for validation purposes. Additionally, an independent validation is conducted by comparing computed quasigeoid models (derived from tailored gravity data) with height anomalies from GPS/levelling data over the two study sites. The accuracy of the tailored gravity model in reproducing observed gravity data is noteworthy, with a ±8.9 mGal accuracy for the study site in South Africa at 2867 test points and a ±10.4 mGal accuracy for the study site in Cameroon at 637 test points. Comparing height anomalies from GPS/levelling with the SATGQG quasigeoid model (developed from tailored gravity data) and the recent CDSM09A quasigeoid model at 11 GPS/levelling data points reveals comparable accuracies of ±0.10 m and ±0.05 m, for SATGQG and CDSM09A, respectively for the site in South Africa. For the Cameroon site, the differences between height anomalies from GPS/levelling and the CTGQG quasigeoid model (developed from tailored gravity data), along with the recent CGM20 quasigeoid model at 38 GPS/levelling data points, show practically equal accuracies of ±0.15 m for CTGQG and ±0.11 m for CGM20. These findings underscore the potential of tailored gravity-field model in developing accurate quasigeoid models, particularly in regions with limited gravity data coverage. This approach holds promise for gravity recovery and precise geoid modelling in developing countries and regions with insufficient coverage of terrestrial gravity data.
验证用于喀麦隆和南非选定地点精确准大地水准面建模的定制重力场模型
在这项研究中,开发了一个量身定制的重力场模型,通过整合全球重力场模型的重力、地形数据得出的残余重力以及非洲两个研究地点(喀麦隆和南非)观测到的陆地重力,来拟合和恢复当地的陆地重力数据。在建模阶段,利用了三分之二的陆地重力数据,保留其余三分之一用于验证目的。此外,还进行了独立验证,将计算出的类大地水准面模型(由定制重力数据得出)与两个研究地点的全球定位系统/水准测量数据得出的高度异常值进行比较。值得注意的是,定制重力模型在重现观测重力数据方面的精度很高,南非研究地点的 2867 个测试点的精度为 ±8.9 mGal,喀麦隆研究地点的 637 个测试点的精度为 ±10.4 mGal。在 11 个 GPS/水准测量数据点上,将 GPS/水准测量的高度异常与 SATGQG 类大地水准面模型(根据定制重力数据开发)和最新的 CDSM09A 类大地水准面模型进行比较,发现南非站点的 SATGQG 和 CDSM09A 的精度相当,分别为±0.10 米和±0.05 米。在喀麦隆站点,在 38 个 GPS/水准测量数据点上,GPS/水准测量的高度异常与 CTGQG 准大地水准面模型(根据定制重力数据开发)以及最近的 CGM20 准大地水准面模型之间的差异显示,CTGQG 和 CGM20 的精度几乎相同,分别为±0.15 米和±0.11 米。这些发现强调了定制重力场模型在开发精确准大地水准面模型方面的潜力,尤其是在重力数据覆盖范围有限的地区。这种方法为发展中国家和地面重力数据覆盖不足的地区的重力恢复和精确大地水准面建模带来了希望。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Applied Geodesy
Journal of Applied Geodesy REMOTE SENSING-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
7.10%
发文量
30
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信