D. Karageorgou, Laura Lara-Castor, Victoria Padula de Quadros, Rita Ferreira de Sousa, Bridget Anna Holmes, Sofia Ioannidou, D. Mozaffarian, R. Micha
{"title":"Harmonizing dietary datasets for global surveillance: Methods and findings from the Global Dietary Database.","authors":"D. Karageorgou, Laura Lara-Castor, Victoria Padula de Quadros, Rita Ferreira de Sousa, Bridget Anna Holmes, Sofia Ioannidou, D. Mozaffarian, R. Micha","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3986020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE\nThe Global Dietary Database (GDD) expanded its previous methods to harmonize and publicly disseminate individual-level dietary data from nutrition surveys worldwide.\n\n\nDESIGN\nAnalysis of cross-sectional data.\n\n\nSETTING\nGlobal.\n\n\nPARTICIPANTS\nGeneral population.\n\n\nMETHODS\nComprehensive methods to streamline the harmonization of primary, individual-level 24-hour recall and food record data worldwide were developed. To standardize the varying food descriptions, FoodEx2 was used, a highly detailed food classification and description system developed and adapted for international use by EFSA. Standardized processes were developed to: identify eligible surveys; contact data owners; screen surveys for inclusion; harmonize data structure, variable definition and unit, and food characterization; perform data checks; and publicly disseminate the harmonized datasets. The GDD joined forces with FAO and EFSA, given the shared goal of harmonizing individual-level dietary data worldwide.\n\n\nRESULTS\nOf 1,500 dietary surveys identified, 600 met the eligibility criteria, and 156 were prioritized and contacted; 55 surveys were included for harmonization and, ultimately, 52 were harmonized. The included surveys were primarily nationally representative (59%); included high- (39%), upper-middle (21%), lower-middle (27%), and low- (13%) income countries; usually collected multiple recalls/ records (64%); and largely captured both sexes, all ages, and both rural and urban areas. Surveys from low- and lower-middle vs high- and upper-middle income countries reported fewer nutrients (median 17 vs. 30), and rarely included nutrients relevant to diet-related chronic diseases, such as omega-3 fatty acids and sodium.\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nDiverse 24-hour recalls/records can be harmonized to provide highly granular, standardized data, supporting nutrition programming, research, and capacity development worldwide.","PeriodicalId":509097,"journal":{"name":"Public Health Nutrition","volume":"1 6","pages":"1-52"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Health Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3986020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
OBJECTIVE
The Global Dietary Database (GDD) expanded its previous methods to harmonize and publicly disseminate individual-level dietary data from nutrition surveys worldwide.
DESIGN
Analysis of cross-sectional data.
SETTING
Global.
PARTICIPANTS
General population.
METHODS
Comprehensive methods to streamline the harmonization of primary, individual-level 24-hour recall and food record data worldwide were developed. To standardize the varying food descriptions, FoodEx2 was used, a highly detailed food classification and description system developed and adapted for international use by EFSA. Standardized processes were developed to: identify eligible surveys; contact data owners; screen surveys for inclusion; harmonize data structure, variable definition and unit, and food characterization; perform data checks; and publicly disseminate the harmonized datasets. The GDD joined forces with FAO and EFSA, given the shared goal of harmonizing individual-level dietary data worldwide.
RESULTS
Of 1,500 dietary surveys identified, 600 met the eligibility criteria, and 156 were prioritized and contacted; 55 surveys were included for harmonization and, ultimately, 52 were harmonized. The included surveys were primarily nationally representative (59%); included high- (39%), upper-middle (21%), lower-middle (27%), and low- (13%) income countries; usually collected multiple recalls/ records (64%); and largely captured both sexes, all ages, and both rural and urban areas. Surveys from low- and lower-middle vs high- and upper-middle income countries reported fewer nutrients (median 17 vs. 30), and rarely included nutrients relevant to diet-related chronic diseases, such as omega-3 fatty acids and sodium.
CONCLUSIONS
Diverse 24-hour recalls/records can be harmonized to provide highly granular, standardized data, supporting nutrition programming, research, and capacity development worldwide.