Instructing students in history museums: A systematic literature review

Brent Geerts, F. Depaepe, Karel van Nieuwenhuyse
{"title":"Instructing students in history museums: A systematic literature review","authors":"Brent Geerts, F. Depaepe, Karel van Nieuwenhuyse","doi":"10.52289/hej11.111","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"History museums offer a wide range of possibilities to engage students in learning about the past, as well as about history. When compared to scholarly research on other types of museums, their educational promises are underexposed. Within these promises, instructional practices and instructional agents such as museum educators and history teachers play an important role. In order to get a view on research methods and findings regarding instruction within history museums, we conducted a systematic literature review. Three scholarly databases were searched, yielding 45 peer-reviewed journal articles. Those have been fully screened, analysed and compared regarding their research design (in terms of research questions, participants involved, and theoretical and methodological approaches) and their research outcomes (in terms of what they revealed about the content, the nature and the approach of instruction in history museums). Review outcomes reveal four different types of research designs, ranging from describing instructional practices to studying beliefs or a combination thereof, or a focus on the relationship between instruction and students’ learning. Within each of these types, great variety was observed regarding the involved participants and the theoretical and methodological approaches. Besides, the review distinguished three areas of research outcomes, namely the goals of instruction, the instructional methods and the relationship between schools and museums before, during and after instruction. Findings within these areas reveal that certain tensions exist, for example between cognitive and emotional-affective learning goals, also related to disciplinary (historical) and civic educational goals. Other tensions were to be distinguished between student- and teacher-centred instructional methods and between beliefs and practices regarding collaborations between schools and museums. Taken together, these research outcomes yield important implications for instructional practices in history museums and for future scholarly research on them.","PeriodicalId":511679,"journal":{"name":"Historical Encounters: A journal of historical consciousness, historical cultures, and history education","volume":"14 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Historical Encounters: A journal of historical consciousness, historical cultures, and history education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52289/hej11.111","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

History museums offer a wide range of possibilities to engage students in learning about the past, as well as about history. When compared to scholarly research on other types of museums, their educational promises are underexposed. Within these promises, instructional practices and instructional agents such as museum educators and history teachers play an important role. In order to get a view on research methods and findings regarding instruction within history museums, we conducted a systematic literature review. Three scholarly databases were searched, yielding 45 peer-reviewed journal articles. Those have been fully screened, analysed and compared regarding their research design (in terms of research questions, participants involved, and theoretical and methodological approaches) and their research outcomes (in terms of what they revealed about the content, the nature and the approach of instruction in history museums). Review outcomes reveal four different types of research designs, ranging from describing instructional practices to studying beliefs or a combination thereof, or a focus on the relationship between instruction and students’ learning. Within each of these types, great variety was observed regarding the involved participants and the theoretical and methodological approaches. Besides, the review distinguished three areas of research outcomes, namely the goals of instruction, the instructional methods and the relationship between schools and museums before, during and after instruction. Findings within these areas reveal that certain tensions exist, for example between cognitive and emotional-affective learning goals, also related to disciplinary (historical) and civic educational goals. Other tensions were to be distinguished between student- and teacher-centred instructional methods and between beliefs and practices regarding collaborations between schools and museums. Taken together, these research outcomes yield important implications for instructional practices in history museums and for future scholarly research on them.
在历史博物馆指导学生:系统文献综述
历史博物馆为学生学习过去和历史提供了广泛的可能性。与关于其他类型博物馆的学术研究相比,历史博物馆的教育承诺未得到充分的展示。在这些承诺中,博物馆教育工作者和历史教师等教学实践和教学主体发挥着重要作用。为了了解有关历史博物馆教学的研究方法和结果,我们进行了一次系统的文献综述。我们搜索了三个学术数据库,共获得 45 篇经同行评审的期刊论文。我们对这些文章的研究设计(研究问题、参与人员、理论和方法)和研究成果(揭示了历史博物馆教学的内容、性质和方法)进行了全面筛选、分析和比较。审查结果显示了四种不同类型的研究设计,从描述教学实践到研究信仰或两者的结合,或侧重于教学与学生学习之间的关系。在每种类型中,参与研究的人员以及理论和方法都有很大差异。此外,综述还区分了三个研究成果领域,即教学目标、教学方法以及教学前、教学中和教学后学校与博物馆之间的关系。这些领域的研究结果表明,存在着某些矛盾,例如认知和情感学习目标之间的矛盾,也与学科(历史)和公民教育目标有关。以学生为中心的教学方法和以教师为中心的教学方法之间,以及学校与博物馆之间合作的信念和实践之间,也存在着其他矛盾。总之,这些研究成果对历史博物馆的教学实践和未来的学术研究具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信