Exploitation of Autophagy Inducers in the Management of Dementia: A Systematic Review

M. Corasaniti, G. Bagetta, P. Nicotera, S. Maione, P. Tonin, F. Guida, D. Scuteri
{"title":"Exploitation of Autophagy Inducers in the Management of Dementia: A Systematic Review","authors":"M. Corasaniti, G. Bagetta, P. Nicotera, S. Maione, P. Tonin, F. Guida, D. Scuteri","doi":"10.3390/ijms25021264","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The social burden of dementia is remarkable since it affects some 57.4 million people all over the world. Impairment of autophagy in age-related diseases, such as dementia, deserves deep investigation for the detection of novel disease-modifying approaches. Several drugs belonging to different classes were suggested to be effective in managing Alzheimer’s disease (AD) by means of autophagy induction. Useful autophagy inducers in AD should be endowed with a direct, measurable effect on autophagy, have a safe tolerability profile, and have the capability to cross the blood–brain barrier, at least with poor penetration. According to the PRISMA 2020 recommendations, we propose here a systematic review to appraise the measurable effectiveness of autophagy inducers in the improvement of cognitive decline and neuropsychiatric symptoms in clinical trials and retrospective studies. The systematic search retrieved 3067 records, 10 of which met the eligibility criteria. The outcomes most influenced by the treatment were cognition and executive functioning, pointing at a role for metformin, resveratrol, masitinib and TPI-287, with an overall tolerable safety profile. Differences in sample power, intervention, patients enrolled, assessment, and measure of outcomes prevents generalization of results. Moreover, the domain of behavioral symptoms was found to be less investigated, thus prompting new prospective studies with homogeneous design. PROSPERO registration: CRD42023393456.","PeriodicalId":509625,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Molecular Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Molecular Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25021264","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The social burden of dementia is remarkable since it affects some 57.4 million people all over the world. Impairment of autophagy in age-related diseases, such as dementia, deserves deep investigation for the detection of novel disease-modifying approaches. Several drugs belonging to different classes were suggested to be effective in managing Alzheimer’s disease (AD) by means of autophagy induction. Useful autophagy inducers in AD should be endowed with a direct, measurable effect on autophagy, have a safe tolerability profile, and have the capability to cross the blood–brain barrier, at least with poor penetration. According to the PRISMA 2020 recommendations, we propose here a systematic review to appraise the measurable effectiveness of autophagy inducers in the improvement of cognitive decline and neuropsychiatric symptoms in clinical trials and retrospective studies. The systematic search retrieved 3067 records, 10 of which met the eligibility criteria. The outcomes most influenced by the treatment were cognition and executive functioning, pointing at a role for metformin, resveratrol, masitinib and TPI-287, with an overall tolerable safety profile. Differences in sample power, intervention, patients enrolled, assessment, and measure of outcomes prevents generalization of results. Moreover, the domain of behavioral symptoms was found to be less investigated, thus prompting new prospective studies with homogeneous design. PROSPERO registration: CRD42023393456.
利用自噬诱导剂治疗痴呆症:系统回顾
痴呆症的社会负担非常沉重,全世界约有 5740 万人受到痴呆症的影响。自噬功能在老年痴呆症等老年相关疾病中的损害值得深入研究,以发现新的疾病治疗方法。一些不同类别的药物被认为能通过诱导自噬作用有效控制阿尔茨海默病(AD)。对阿兹海默病有用的自噬诱导剂应该对自噬具有直接、可测量的作用,具有安全的耐受性,并能穿过血脑屏障,至少穿透性较差。根据 PRISMA 2020 的建议,我们在此提出一项系统性综述,以评估自噬诱导剂在临床试验和回顾性研究中改善认知功能衰退和神经精神症状的可测量效果。系统性检索共检索到 3067 条记录,其中 10 条符合资格标准。受治疗影响最大的结果是认知能力和执行功能,这表明二甲双胍、白藜芦醇、马西替尼和TPI-287都能发挥作用,而且总体上具有可耐受的安全性。由于样本量、干预措施、入组患者、评估方法和结果测量方法的不同,研究结果难以推广。此外,还发现行为症状领域的研究较少,因此需要采用同质化设计开展新的前瞻性研究。PROSPERO 注册:CRD42023393456。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信