Shear Bond Strength of Chemical and Light Cured Glass Ionomer Cements Bonded to Resin Composite

Sabah A. Ismail صباح عبد الوهاب اسماعيل, Shaymaa Sh. Hassan شيماء شاكر حسن
{"title":"Shear Bond Strength of Chemical and Light Cured Glass Ionomer Cements Bonded to Resin Composite","authors":"Sabah A. Ismail صباح عبد الوهاب اسماعيل, Shaymaa Sh. Hassan شيماء شاكر حسن","doi":"10.25130/tjds.2.1.5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study was to compare the shear bond strength of chemically cured (Conventional) glass ionomer cement and light cured (Resin modified) glass ionomer cement to resin composite and to evaluate the effect of acid etching of the glass ionomer cements on the shear bond strength.Forty acrylic molds were prepared, a hole (6×2) mm was prepared in each mold to retain the glass ionomer cements (GICs). The samples were divided into two main groups. The first group were filled with Conventional GIC and the second group were filled with Resin modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC), then each group were subdivided into two subgroups, the first subgroup were acid etched and the second subgroup were left without etching. The bonding agent applied to the demarcated bond area on the GIC surface, the composite resin cylinders were built up over the GIC base. The samples were stored for one week in deionized water then thermocycled. The samples then tested for shear bond strength (SBS) using universal testing machine.The result shows that Independent samples T-test used for statistical analysis. The result showed that RMGIC significantly had higher SBS than conventional GIC. No statistical difference was shown in SBS between subgroup etched and without etching for RMGIC, but the conventional GIC showed significantly higher SBS in subgroup without etching than with etching.This study Conclude that the SBS of RMGIC to resin composite was significantly higher than that of conventional GIC. Acid etching the GIC surface did not improve the SBS of GICs to resin composite.","PeriodicalId":512116,"journal":{"name":"Tikrit Journal for Dental Sciences","volume":"1 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tikrit Journal for Dental Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25130/tjds.2.1.5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare the shear bond strength of chemically cured (Conventional) glass ionomer cement and light cured (Resin modified) glass ionomer cement to resin composite and to evaluate the effect of acid etching of the glass ionomer cements on the shear bond strength.Forty acrylic molds were prepared, a hole (6×2) mm was prepared in each mold to retain the glass ionomer cements (GICs). The samples were divided into two main groups. The first group were filled with Conventional GIC and the second group were filled with Resin modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC), then each group were subdivided into two subgroups, the first subgroup were acid etched and the second subgroup were left without etching. The bonding agent applied to the demarcated bond area on the GIC surface, the composite resin cylinders were built up over the GIC base. The samples were stored for one week in deionized water then thermocycled. The samples then tested for shear bond strength (SBS) using universal testing machine.The result shows that Independent samples T-test used for statistical analysis. The result showed that RMGIC significantly had higher SBS than conventional GIC. No statistical difference was shown in SBS between subgroup etched and without etching for RMGIC, but the conventional GIC showed significantly higher SBS in subgroup without etching than with etching.This study Conclude that the SBS of RMGIC to resin composite was significantly higher than that of conventional GIC. Acid etching the GIC surface did not improve the SBS of GICs to resin composite.
化学和光固化玻璃离子粘合剂与树脂复合材料的剪切粘接强度
本研究的目的是比较化学固化(传统)玻璃离子粘合剂和光固化(树脂改性)玻璃离子粘合剂与树脂复合材料的剪切粘结强度,并评估玻璃离子粘合剂酸蚀对剪切粘结强度的影响。准备了 40 个丙烯酸模具,每个模具上都准备了一个(6×2)毫米的孔,以保留玻璃离子粘合剂(GIC)。样品主要分为两组。第一组填充传统 GIC,第二组填充树脂改性玻璃离子水泥(RMGIC),然后每组又分为两个亚组,第一亚组进行酸蚀,第二亚组不进行酸蚀。将粘接剂涂抹在 GIC 表面划定的粘接区域,然后在 GIC 基底上形成复合树脂圆柱体。样品在去离子水中存放一周,然后进行热循环。结果显示,统计分析采用了独立样本 T 检验。结果显示,RMGIC 的 SBS 明显高于传统 GIC。本研究得出结论:RMGIC 与树脂复合材料的 SBS 明显高于传统 GIC。酸蚀 GIC 表面并不能改善 GIC 与树脂复合材料的 SBS。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信