The Incidence of Pain after Root Canal Treatment Using Different Irrigation Methods

I. Al-Zaka
{"title":"The Incidence of Pain after Root Canal Treatment Using Different Irrigation Methods","authors":"I. Al-Zaka","doi":"10.25130/tjds.2.1.7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this study was to compare the postoperative level of pain after root canal therapy using different irrigation protocol. Materials and method: in a clinical trial, 90 asymptomatic single-rooted teeth were treated endodontically with different irrigation techniques. The teeth were randomly assigned into three groups. In group I(n = 30), procedures were performed using an endodontic irrigating syringe (Vista, Appli-vac). The group II (n = 30) used an irrigation device based on subsonic system Endoactivator (Dentsply Tulsa Dental Specialist). In group III (n = 30) used Safety Irrigator (Vista Dental Products, WI). Pain levels were assessed by an analog scale questionnaire after 4, 24, and 48 hours. Results: during the all time intervals after treatment, the pain experience with group III was significantly lower than the other methods. In conclusion, an irrigation/evacuation system Safety Irrigator resulted in significantly less postoperative pain than subsonic Endoactivator and conventional needle irrigation","PeriodicalId":512116,"journal":{"name":"Tikrit Journal for Dental Sciences","volume":"12 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tikrit Journal for Dental Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25130/tjds.2.1.7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare the postoperative level of pain after root canal therapy using different irrigation protocol. Materials and method: in a clinical trial, 90 asymptomatic single-rooted teeth were treated endodontically with different irrigation techniques. The teeth were randomly assigned into three groups. In group I(n = 30), procedures were performed using an endodontic irrigating syringe (Vista, Appli-vac). The group II (n = 30) used an irrigation device based on subsonic system Endoactivator (Dentsply Tulsa Dental Specialist). In group III (n = 30) used Safety Irrigator (Vista Dental Products, WI). Pain levels were assessed by an analog scale questionnaire after 4, 24, and 48 hours. Results: during the all time intervals after treatment, the pain experience with group III was significantly lower than the other methods. In conclusion, an irrigation/evacuation system Safety Irrigator resulted in significantly less postoperative pain than subsonic Endoactivator and conventional needle irrigation
使用不同冲洗方法进行根管治疗后疼痛的发生率
本研究旨在比较使用不同灌洗方案进行根管治疗后的术后疼痛程度。材料和方法:在一项临床试验中,对 90 颗无症状的单根牙采用不同的冲洗技术进行根管治疗。这些牙齿被随机分为三组。第一组(n = 30)使用根管冲洗注射器(Vista,Appli-vac)进行治疗。第二组(n = 30)使用基于亚音速系统 Endoactivator(Dentsply Tulsa Dental Specialist)的灌洗装置。第三组(n = 30)使用安全灌洗器(Vista Dental Products,WI)。疼痛程度在 4、24 和 48 小时后通过模拟量表问卷进行评估。结果:在治疗后的所有时间间隔内,第三组的疼痛体验明显低于其他方法。总之,与亚音速 Endoactivator 和传统针头冲洗相比,冲洗/排气系统 Safety Irrigator 带来的术后疼痛明显更少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信