Effect of Dry Needling in Patient with Cervical Radiculopathy in Reducing Pain and Increasing Rom Compared to Interferential Therapy

P.M. Bala rathna, Muthukumaran Jothilingam
{"title":"Effect of Dry Needling in Patient with Cervical Radiculopathy in Reducing Pain and Increasing Rom Compared to Interferential Therapy","authors":"P.M. Bala rathna, Muthukumaran Jothilingam","doi":"10.37506/pv9zbp03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: This study was designed to inspect the effectiveness of Dry needling and interferential therapy oncervical radiculopathy patients.Purpose: To compare the effectiveness of dry needling and interferential therapy in patients with cervicalradiculopathy.Materials and methods: It is an experimental study from November 2022 to April 2023. In this study, 30 subjectswere allocated randomly using a randomization method (computer-generated random numbers) according toinclusion and exclusion criteria. Group A was allocated for interferential therapy with neck exercise (n=15) andGroup B was allocated for dry needling with neck exercise (n =15). Outcome measures are NPRS (Numerical painrating scale), Goniometer. Informed consent was obtained from the patient.Result: From the statistical analysis, both groups showed extremely satisfied statistical significance between theirpre- and post-test values (p<0.0001) Also, there is a significant difference in the post-test values of both groups(p<0.0001) which denotes that dry needling therapy with neck exercises values are higher than the IFT with neckexercises values for reducing pain and increasing ROM of cervical joint for cervical radiculopathy.Conclusion: In this study, Dry needling with Neck exercise activities was found to be more beneficial than IFTwith neck exercise in reducing cervical pain and increasing ROM.","PeriodicalId":516273,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Physiotherapy &amp; Occupational Therapy - An International Journal","volume":"17 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Physiotherapy &amp; Occupational Therapy - An International Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37506/pv9zbp03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study was designed to inspect the effectiveness of Dry needling and interferential therapy oncervical radiculopathy patients.Purpose: To compare the effectiveness of dry needling and interferential therapy in patients with cervicalradiculopathy.Materials and methods: It is an experimental study from November 2022 to April 2023. In this study, 30 subjectswere allocated randomly using a randomization method (computer-generated random numbers) according toinclusion and exclusion criteria. Group A was allocated for interferential therapy with neck exercise (n=15) andGroup B was allocated for dry needling with neck exercise (n =15). Outcome measures are NPRS (Numerical painrating scale), Goniometer. Informed consent was obtained from the patient.Result: From the statistical analysis, both groups showed extremely satisfied statistical significance between theirpre- and post-test values (p<0.0001) Also, there is a significant difference in the post-test values of both groups(p<0.0001) which denotes that dry needling therapy with neck exercises values are higher than the IFT with neckexercises values for reducing pain and increasing ROM of cervical joint for cervical radiculopathy.Conclusion: In this study, Dry needling with Neck exercise activities was found to be more beneficial than IFTwith neck exercise in reducing cervical pain and increasing ROM.
与干扰疗法相比,干针疗法对颈椎病患者减轻疼痛和提高生活质量的效果
研究背景目的:比较干针疗法和干涉疗法对颈椎病患者的疗效:这是一项实验研究,研究时间为2022年11月至2023年4月。在这项研究中,根据纳入和排除标准,采用随机方法(计算机生成随机数)将 30 名受试者随机分配。A组被分配进行干扰治疗和颈部锻炼(n=15),B组被分配进行干针治疗和颈部锻炼(n=15)。结果测量指标为 NPRS(数字疼痛评分量表)和动态关节角度计。结果:从统计分析来看,两组患者的前测和后测值均有非常满意的统计学意义(P<0.0001),而且两组患者的后测值也有显著差异(P<0.0001),这表明干针疗法配合颈部运动在减轻颈椎病患者疼痛和增加颈椎关节活动度方面的疗效要高于工频疗法配合颈部运动的疗效:本研究发现,在减轻颈椎疼痛和增加颈椎关节活动度方面,干针疗法配合颈部锻炼活动比 IFT 配合颈部锻炼更有益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信