Mobilization, self-expression or argument? A computational method for identifying language styles in political discussion on Twitter

Lingshu Hu
{"title":"Mobilization, self-expression or argument? A computational method for identifying language styles in political discussion on Twitter","authors":"Lingshu Hu","doi":"10.1108/oir-10-2022-0545","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThis study develops a computational method to investigate the predominant language styles in political discussions on Twitter and their connections with users' online characteristics.Design/methodology/approachThis study gathers a large Twitter dataset comprising political discussions across various topics from general users. It utilizes an unsupervised machine learning algorithm with pre-defined language features to detect language styles in political discussions on Twitter. Furthermore, it employs a multinomial model to explore the relationships between language styles and users' online characteristics.FindingsThrough the analysis of over 700,000 political tweets, this study identifies six language styles: mobilizing, self-expressive, argumentative, narrative, analytic and informational. Furthermore, by investigating the covariation between language styles and users' online characteristics, such as social connections, expressive desires and gender, this study reveals a preference for an informational style and an aversion to an argumentative style in political discussions. It also uncovers gender differences in language styles, with women being more likely to belong to the mobilizing group but less likely to belong to the analytic and informational groups.Practical implicationsThis study provides insights into the psychological mechanisms and social statuses of users who adopt particular language styles. It assists political communicators in understanding their audience and tailoring their language to suit specific contexts and communication objectives.Social implicationsThis study reveals gender differences in language styles, suggesting that women may have a heightened desire for social support in political discussions. It highlights that traditional gender disparities in politics might persist in online public spaces.Originality/valueThis study develops a computational methodology by combining cluster analysis with pre-defined linguistic features to categorize language styles. This approach integrates statistical algorithms with communication and linguistic theories, providing researchers with an unsupervised method for analyzing textual data. It focuses on detecting language styles rather than topics or themes in the text, complementing widely used text classification methods such as topic modeling. Additionally, this study explores the associations between language styles and the online characteristics of social media users in a political context.","PeriodicalId":503252,"journal":{"name":"Online Information Review","volume":"27 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Online Information Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/oir-10-2022-0545","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeThis study develops a computational method to investigate the predominant language styles in political discussions on Twitter and their connections with users' online characteristics.Design/methodology/approachThis study gathers a large Twitter dataset comprising political discussions across various topics from general users. It utilizes an unsupervised machine learning algorithm with pre-defined language features to detect language styles in political discussions on Twitter. Furthermore, it employs a multinomial model to explore the relationships between language styles and users' online characteristics.FindingsThrough the analysis of over 700,000 political tweets, this study identifies six language styles: mobilizing, self-expressive, argumentative, narrative, analytic and informational. Furthermore, by investigating the covariation between language styles and users' online characteristics, such as social connections, expressive desires and gender, this study reveals a preference for an informational style and an aversion to an argumentative style in political discussions. It also uncovers gender differences in language styles, with women being more likely to belong to the mobilizing group but less likely to belong to the analytic and informational groups.Practical implicationsThis study provides insights into the psychological mechanisms and social statuses of users who adopt particular language styles. It assists political communicators in understanding their audience and tailoring their language to suit specific contexts and communication objectives.Social implicationsThis study reveals gender differences in language styles, suggesting that women may have a heightened desire for social support in political discussions. It highlights that traditional gender disparities in politics might persist in online public spaces.Originality/valueThis study develops a computational methodology by combining cluster analysis with pre-defined linguistic features to categorize language styles. This approach integrates statistical algorithms with communication and linguistic theories, providing researchers with an unsupervised method for analyzing textual data. It focuses on detecting language styles rather than topics or themes in the text, complementing widely used text classification methods such as topic modeling. Additionally, this study explores the associations between language styles and the online characteristics of social media users in a political context.
动员、自我表达还是争论?识别推特政治讨论语言风格的计算方法
目的 本研究开发了一种计算方法,用于研究 Twitter 上政治讨论中的主要语言风格及其与用户在线特征之间的联系。它利用一种带有预定义语言特征的无监督机器学习算法来检测 Twitter 上政治讨论的语言风格。研究结果通过分析 70 多万条政治推文,本研究确定了六种语言风格:动员型、自我表达型、论证型、叙述型、分析型和信息型。此外,通过调查语言风格与用户在线特征(如社会关系、表达欲望和性别)之间的协变关系,本研究揭示了用户在政治讨论中对信息风格的偏好和对争论风格的厌恶。这项研究还揭示了语言风格的性别差异,女性更倾向于动员型语言风格,而较少倾向于分析型和信息型语言风格。社会意义本研究揭示了语言风格的性别差异,表明女性在政治讨论中可能更渴望社会支持。本研究开发了一种计算方法,将聚类分析与预定义的语言特征相结合,对语言风格进行分类。这种方法将统计算法与传播学和语言学理论相结合,为研究人员提供了一种无监督的文本数据分析方法。它侧重于检测文本中的语言风格,而不是主题或专题,是对主题建模等广泛使用的文本分类方法的补充。此外,本研究还探讨了政治背景下语言风格与社交媒体用户在线特征之间的关联。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信