A Quasi-Randomized Clinical Trial to Compare the Effects of Suspension Versus Instability Training on Balance.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 REHABILITATION
Journal of Sport Rehabilitation Pub Date : 2024-01-22 Print Date: 2024-03-01 DOI:10.1123/jsr.2023-0161
José-María Blasco, Catalina Tolsada-Velasco, Irene Borja-de-Fuentes, Elena Costa-Moreno, Carmen García-Gomáriz, David Hernández-Guillén
{"title":"A Quasi-Randomized Clinical Trial to Compare the Effects of Suspension Versus Instability Training on Balance.","authors":"José-María Blasco, Catalina Tolsada-Velasco, Irene Borja-de-Fuentes, Elena Costa-Moreno, Carmen García-Gomáriz, David Hernández-Guillén","doi":"10.1123/jsr.2023-0161","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Suspension training devices are becoming increasingly popular. Most studies analyzed the effectiveness according to diverse measures in patients with or without conditions at any age. The characteristics of suspension training are very specific and can increase instability and; therefore, enhance balance. The goal was to determine the effects of suspension training on balance by comparing it with instability training.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Two-arm, randomized trial.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>44 young adults, aged 22.4 years old, with no musculoskeletal condition, took part. There were 2 interventions, suspension and instability training, designed with 12 sessions in 4 weeks. The primary outcome was the Y-Balance test. Other balance outcomes were the Emery and jumping sideways tests, and platform measures while standing.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Suspension and instability training were effective in enhancing balance in terms of the primary outcome, the Y-Balance test, with no between-group differences. Instability training enhanced the Emery test over suspension training (P = .018), but the latter was more effective in the jumping sideways test (P = .003). Neither of the training improved static balance measures.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Training with suspension devices is effective in enhancing dynamic balance, with similar improvements to instability training. Importantly, the magnitude of change and the frequency of responders to intervention in terms of motor coordination and keeping balance in unstable conditions appear to be sensitive to the type of training.</p>","PeriodicalId":50041,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sport Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"155-160"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sport Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1123/jsr.2023-0161","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context: Suspension training devices are becoming increasingly popular. Most studies analyzed the effectiveness according to diverse measures in patients with or without conditions at any age. The characteristics of suspension training are very specific and can increase instability and; therefore, enhance balance. The goal was to determine the effects of suspension training on balance by comparing it with instability training.

Design: Two-arm, randomized trial.

Methods: 44 young adults, aged 22.4 years old, with no musculoskeletal condition, took part. There were 2 interventions, suspension and instability training, designed with 12 sessions in 4 weeks. The primary outcome was the Y-Balance test. Other balance outcomes were the Emery and jumping sideways tests, and platform measures while standing.

Results: Suspension and instability training were effective in enhancing balance in terms of the primary outcome, the Y-Balance test, with no between-group differences. Instability training enhanced the Emery test over suspension training (P = .018), but the latter was more effective in the jumping sideways test (P = .003). Neither of the training improved static balance measures.

Conclusions: Training with suspension devices is effective in enhancing dynamic balance, with similar improvements to instability training. Importantly, the magnitude of change and the frequency of responders to intervention in terms of motor coordination and keeping balance in unstable conditions appear to be sensitive to the type of training.

比较悬吊与不稳定性训练对平衡的影响的准随机临床试验。
背景悬吊训练装置越来越受欢迎。大多数研究根据不同的测量方法,对任何年龄段的有病或无病患者的有效性进行了分析。悬吊训练的特点非常特殊,可以增加不稳定性,从而增强平衡能力。我们的目标是通过将悬吊训练与不稳定性训练进行比较,确定悬吊训练对平衡的影响:方法:44 名年龄为 22.4 岁、无肌肉骨骼疾病的年轻人参加。共有两种干预方法,即悬吊训练和不稳定训练,设计为 4 周 12 次课程。主要结果是 Y 平衡测试。其他平衡测试结果包括埃默里测试和侧跳测试,以及站立时的平台测量:结果:悬吊和不稳定性训练能有效提高主要结果--Y-平衡测试--的平衡能力,组间无差异。在埃默里测试中,不稳定性训练比悬吊训练更有效(P = .018),但后者在侧向跳跃测试中更有效(P = .003)。两种训练都不能改善静态平衡测量:结论:使用悬挂装置进行训练能有效提高动态平衡能力,其改善效果与不稳定性训练相似。重要的是,在运动协调性和在不稳定条件下保持平衡方面,变化的幅度和对干预做出反应的频率似乎对训练类型很敏感。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Sport Rehabilitation
Journal of Sport Rehabilitation 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.90%
发文量
143
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Sport Rehabilitation (JSR) is your source for the latest peer-reviewed research in the field of sport rehabilitation. All members of the sports-medicine team will benefit from the wealth of important information in each issue. JSR is completely devoted to the rehabilitation of sport and exercise injuries, regardless of the age, gender, sport ability, level of fitness, or health status of the participant. JSR publishes peer-reviewed original research, systematic reviews/meta-analyses, critically appraised topics (CATs), case studies/series, and technical reports that directly affect the management and rehabilitation of injuries incurred during sport-related activities, irrespective of the individual’s age, gender, sport ability, level of fitness, or health status. The journal is intended to provide an international, multidisciplinary forum to serve the needs of all members of the sports medicine team, including athletic trainers/therapists, sport physical therapists/physiotherapists, sports medicine physicians, and other health care and medical professionals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信