A Brief Tool to Screen Patients for Precarious Employment: A Validation Study.

IF 4.4 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Julia W Ho, Emily Bellicoso, Madeleine Bondy, Dorothy Linn Holness, Carles Muntaner, Rosane Nisenbaum, Arlinda Ruco, Nadha Hassen, Andrew Hanna, Andrew D Pinto
{"title":"A Brief Tool to Screen Patients for Precarious Employment: A Validation Study.","authors":"Julia W Ho, Emily Bellicoso, Madeleine Bondy, Dorothy Linn Holness, Carles Muntaner, Rosane Nisenbaum, Arlinda Ruco, Nadha Hassen, Andrew Hanna, Andrew D Pinto","doi":"10.1370/afm.3053","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Precarious employment, defined by temporary contracts, unstable employment, or job insecurity, is increasingly common and is associated with inconsistent access to benefits, lower income, and greater exposure to physical and psycholosocial hazards. Clinicians can benefit from a simple approach to screen for precarious employment to improve their understanding of a patient's social context, help with diagnoses, and inform treatment plans and intersectional interventions. Our objective was to validate a screening tool for precarious employment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used a 3-item screening tool that covered key aspects of precarious employment: non-standard employment, variable income, and violations of occupational health and safety rights and protections. Answers were compared with classification using the Poverty and Employment Precarity in Southern Ontario Employment Index. Participants were aged 18 years and older, fluent in English, and employed. They were recruited in 7 primary care clinic waiting rooms in Toronto, Canada over 12 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 204 people aged 18-72 years (mean 38 [SD 11.3]) participated, of which 93 (45.6%) identified as men and 119 (58.3%) self-reported as White. Participants who reported 2 or more of the 3 items as positive were almost 4 times more likely to be precariously employed (positive likelihood ratio = 3.84 [95% CI, 2.15-6.80]).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A 3-item screening tool can help identify precarious employment. Our tool is useful for starting a conversation about employment precarity and work conditions in clinical settings. Implementation of this screening tool in health settings could enable better targeting of resources for managing care and connecting patients to legal and employment support services.</p>","PeriodicalId":50973,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Family Medicine","volume":"22 1","pages":"26-30"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11233073/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Family Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.3053","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Precarious employment, defined by temporary contracts, unstable employment, or job insecurity, is increasingly common and is associated with inconsistent access to benefits, lower income, and greater exposure to physical and psycholosocial hazards. Clinicians can benefit from a simple approach to screen for precarious employment to improve their understanding of a patient's social context, help with diagnoses, and inform treatment plans and intersectional interventions. Our objective was to validate a screening tool for precarious employment.

Methods: We used a 3-item screening tool that covered key aspects of precarious employment: non-standard employment, variable income, and violations of occupational health and safety rights and protections. Answers were compared with classification using the Poverty and Employment Precarity in Southern Ontario Employment Index. Participants were aged 18 years and older, fluent in English, and employed. They were recruited in 7 primary care clinic waiting rooms in Toronto, Canada over 12 months.

Results: A total of 204 people aged 18-72 years (mean 38 [SD 11.3]) participated, of which 93 (45.6%) identified as men and 119 (58.3%) self-reported as White. Participants who reported 2 or more of the 3 items as positive were almost 4 times more likely to be precariously employed (positive likelihood ratio = 3.84 [95% CI, 2.15-6.80]).

Conclusions: A 3-item screening tool can help identify precarious employment. Our tool is useful for starting a conversation about employment precarity and work conditions in clinical settings. Implementation of this screening tool in health settings could enable better targeting of resources for managing care and connecting patients to legal and employment support services.

筛查患者就业不稳定情况的简易工具:验证研究。
目的:不稳定就业(定义为临时合同、不稳定就业或工作无保障)越来越普遍,并与不稳定的福利获取途径、较低的收入以及更大的身体和心理社会风险相关联。临床医生可以从筛查不稳定就业的简单方法中获益,从而更好地了解患者的社会背景,帮助诊断,并为治疗计划和交叉干预提供依据。我们的目标是验证不稳定就业筛查工具:我们使用了一个由 3 个项目组成的筛查工具,涵盖了不稳定就业的主要方面:非标准就业、收入不稳定以及违反职业健康和安全权利及保护措施。我们使用 "南安大略省贫困与就业不稳定指数"(Poverty and Employment Precarity in Southern Ontario Employment Index)对参与者的回答进行了比较。参与者年龄在 18 岁及以上,英语流利,有工作。他们是在加拿大多伦多的 7 个初级保健诊所候诊室招募的,历时 12 个月:共有 204 名年龄在 18-72 岁(平均 38 [SD 11.3])的人参加了此次调查,其中 93 人(45.6%)自称为男性,119 人(58.3%)自称为白人。在 3 个项目中报告 2 个或 2 个以上为阳性的参与者,其就业不稳定的可能性几乎高出 4 倍(阳性似然比 = 3.84 [95% CI, 2.15-6.80]):由 3 个项目组成的筛查工具有助于识别就业不稳定情况。我们的工具有助于在临床环境中开展有关就业不稳定和工作条件的对话。在医疗机构中使用该筛查工具可以更好地确定管理护理资源的目标,并将患者与法律和就业支持服务联系起来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of Family Medicine
Annals of Family Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.50%
发文量
142
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Annals of Family Medicine is a peer-reviewed research journal to meet the needs of scientists, practitioners, policymakers, and the patients and communities they serve.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信