Body Mass Index and American Society of Anesthesiologists Score Predict Perioperative Delays in Different Phases for Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Zoe W Hinton, Sean P Ryan, Christine J Wu, Nicholas M Hernandez, Michael P Bolognesi, Thorsten M Seyler
{"title":"Body Mass Index and American Society of Anesthesiologists Score Predict Perioperative Delays in Different Phases for Total Hip Arthroplasty.","authors":"Zoe W Hinton, Sean P Ryan, Christine J Wu, Nicholas M Hernandez, Michael P Bolognesi, Thorsten M Seyler","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Perioperative efficiency has become increasingly important with cost constraints and expanding indications for total hip arthroplasty (THA). We chose to analyze body mass index (BMI) and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, in predicting perioperative efficiency. We retrospectively reviewed the institutional database for primary THAs from July 2015 to January 2018. Patient demographics and perioperative times lines were collected. A multivariable model was utilized to evaluate BMI (< 30, ≥ 30) and ASA (< 3, ≥ 3) for all outcomes. A total of 2,934 patients were included with mean age 62.0 (12.2) years, and 1,599 (54.5%) were female. A BMI ≥ 30 was associated with prolonged operative time (p < 0.001) while an ASA ≥ 3 was predictive of post-anesthesia care unit time (p < 0.001), physical therapy hours (p < 0.001), and length of stay (p < 0.001). Both BMI (p = 0.004) and ASA (p < 0.001) were associated with skilled nursing/rehabilitation dispositions. While BMI predicts prolonged operative time, ASA predicts perioperative delays for anesthesia, nursing, and physical therapy. (Journal of Surgical Orthopaedic Advances 32(3):169-172, 2023).</p>","PeriodicalId":516534,"journal":{"name":"Journal of surgical orthopaedic advances","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of surgical orthopaedic advances","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Perioperative efficiency has become increasingly important with cost constraints and expanding indications for total hip arthroplasty (THA). We chose to analyze body mass index (BMI) and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, in predicting perioperative efficiency. We retrospectively reviewed the institutional database for primary THAs from July 2015 to January 2018. Patient demographics and perioperative times lines were collected. A multivariable model was utilized to evaluate BMI (< 30, ≥ 30) and ASA (< 3, ≥ 3) for all outcomes. A total of 2,934 patients were included with mean age 62.0 (12.2) years, and 1,599 (54.5%) were female. A BMI ≥ 30 was associated with prolonged operative time (p < 0.001) while an ASA ≥ 3 was predictive of post-anesthesia care unit time (p < 0.001), physical therapy hours (p < 0.001), and length of stay (p < 0.001). Both BMI (p = 0.004) and ASA (p < 0.001) were associated with skilled nursing/rehabilitation dispositions. While BMI predicts prolonged operative time, ASA predicts perioperative delays for anesthesia, nursing, and physical therapy. (Journal of Surgical Orthopaedic Advances 32(3):169-172, 2023).

体重指数和美国麻醉医师协会评分可预测全髋关节置换术不同阶段的围手术期延迟。
随着成本的限制和全髋关节置换术(THA)适应症的不断扩大,围手术期的效率变得越来越重要。我们选择分析体重指数(BMI)和美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)评分来预测围手术期效率。我们回顾性地查看了2015年7月至2018年1月期间的机构数据库中的初级THA。收集了患者的人口统计学资料和围手术期时间线。利用多变量模型评估了 BMI(< 30,≥ 30)和 ASA(< 3,≥ 3)对所有结果的影响。共纳入 2,934 例患者,平均年龄 62.0 (12.2) 岁,其中 1,599 例(54.5%)为女性。体重指数≥30与手术时间延长有关(p < 0.001),而ASA≥3可预测麻醉后护理单元时间(p < 0.001)、理疗时间(p < 0.001)和住院时间(p < 0.001)。BMI (p = 0.004) 和 ASA (p < 0.001) 与熟练护理/康复处置相关。BMI 可预测手术时间的延长,而 ASA 则可预测围手术期麻醉、护理和理疗的延迟。(外科骨科进展杂志》32(3):169-172,2023)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信