Effects of combined dexamethasone and dexmedetomidine as adjuncts to peripheral nerve blocks: a systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis.

IF 5.1 2区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Mathias Maagaard, Jakob Hessel Andersen, Pia Jaeger, Ole Mathiesen
{"title":"Effects of combined dexamethasone and dexmedetomidine as adjuncts to peripheral nerve blocks: a systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis.","authors":"Mathias Maagaard, Jakob Hessel Andersen, Pia Jaeger, Ole Mathiesen","doi":"10.1136/rapm-2023-105098","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/importance: </strong>The effects of combining dexamethasone and dexmedetomidine on block duration are unclear.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the effects of combining dexamethasone and dexmedetomidine on block duration.</p><p><strong>Evidence review: </strong>Systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from Medline, Embase, CENTRAL, CINAHL, the Web of Science, and BIOSIS until June 8, 2023. RCTs with adults undergoing surgery with a peripheral nerve block randomized to combined dexamethasone and dexmedetomidine versus placebo or other adjuncts were eligible. Primary outcome was duration of analgesia. We performed meta-analysis, trial sequential analysis, risk of bias-2, and Grading Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation assessment.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>We included 9 RCTs with 14 eligible comparisons. The combination of dexamethasone and dexmedetomidine was compared with placebo in three RCTs (173 participants), dexamethasone in seven (569 participants), and dexmedetomidine in four (281 participants). The duration of analgesia was likely increased with the combination versus placebo (mean difference 460 min, 95% CI 249 to 671) and versus dexmedetomidine (mean difference 388 min, 95% CI 211 to 565). The duration was likely similar with the combination versus dexamethasone (mean difference 50 min, 95% CI -140 to 239). The certainty of the evidence was moderate because most trials were at high risk of bias.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Combined dexamethasone and dexmedetomidine likely increased the duration of analgesia when compared with placebo and dexmedetomidine. The combination likely provided a similar duration of analgesia as dexamethasone. Based on this systematic review, it seems reasonable to use dexamethasone as the sole adjunct if the goal is to increase the duration of analgesia.</p>","PeriodicalId":54503,"journal":{"name":"Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"311-320"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/rapm-2023-105098","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/importance: The effects of combining dexamethasone and dexmedetomidine on block duration are unclear.

Objective: To investigate the effects of combining dexamethasone and dexmedetomidine on block duration.

Evidence review: Systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from Medline, Embase, CENTRAL, CINAHL, the Web of Science, and BIOSIS until June 8, 2023. RCTs with adults undergoing surgery with a peripheral nerve block randomized to combined dexamethasone and dexmedetomidine versus placebo or other adjuncts were eligible. Primary outcome was duration of analgesia. We performed meta-analysis, trial sequential analysis, risk of bias-2, and Grading Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation assessment.

Findings: We included 9 RCTs with 14 eligible comparisons. The combination of dexamethasone and dexmedetomidine was compared with placebo in three RCTs (173 participants), dexamethasone in seven (569 participants), and dexmedetomidine in four (281 participants). The duration of analgesia was likely increased with the combination versus placebo (mean difference 460 min, 95% CI 249 to 671) and versus dexmedetomidine (mean difference 388 min, 95% CI 211 to 565). The duration was likely similar with the combination versus dexamethasone (mean difference 50 min, 95% CI -140 to 239). The certainty of the evidence was moderate because most trials were at high risk of bias.

Conclusions: Combined dexamethasone and dexmedetomidine likely increased the duration of analgesia when compared with placebo and dexmedetomidine. The combination likely provided a similar duration of analgesia as dexamethasone. Based on this systematic review, it seems reasonable to use dexamethasone as the sole adjunct if the goal is to increase the duration of analgesia.

地塞米松和右美托咪定联合作为外周神经阻滞辅助药物的效果:系统综述、荟萃分析和试验序列分析。
背景/重要性:地塞米松和右美托咪定联合使用对阻滞时间的影响尚不明确:研究地塞米松和右美托咪定联合使用对阻滞持续时间的影响:证据回顾:对Medline、Embase、CENTRAL、CINAHL、Web of Science和BIOSIS中截至2023年6月8日的随机对照试验(RCT)进行系统回顾。符合条件的研究对象是接受外周神经阻滞手术的成人,随机采用地塞米松和右美托咪定联合疗法与安慰剂或其他辅助疗法。主要结果为镇痛持续时间。我们进行了荟萃分析、试验序列分析、偏倚风险-2和分级建议评估、发展和评价:结果:我们纳入了 9 项 RCT,其中有 14 项符合条件的比较。地塞米松和右美托咪定的组合与安慰剂进行了比较,有 3 项研究(173 人参与),地塞米松有 7 项研究(569 人参与),右美托咪定有 4 项研究(281 人参与)。与安慰剂(平均差异为 460 分钟,95% CI 为 249 到 671)和右美托咪定(平均差异为 388 分钟,95% CI 为 211 到 565)相比,联合用药的镇痛持续时间可能会延长。联合用药与地塞米松相比,持续时间可能相似(平均差异为 50 分钟,95% CI -140 至 239)。由于大多数试验存在较高的偏倚风险,因此证据的确定性为中度:结论:与安慰剂和右美托咪定相比,地塞米松和右美托咪定联合使用可能会延长镇痛持续时间。地塞米松和右美托咪定的联合镇痛时间可能与地塞米松相似。根据本系统综述,如果目标是延长镇痛持续时间,将地塞米松作为唯一的辅助用药似乎是合理的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
11.80%
发文量
175
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine, the official publication of the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine (ASRA), is a monthly journal that publishes peer-reviewed scientific and clinical studies to advance the understanding and clinical application of regional techniques for surgical anesthesia and postoperative analgesia. Coverage includes intraoperative regional techniques, perioperative pain, chronic pain, obstetric anesthesia, pediatric anesthesia, outcome studies, and complications. Published for over thirty years, this respected journal also serves as the official publication of the European Society of Regional Anaesthesia and Pain Therapy (ESRA), the Asian and Oceanic Society of Regional Anesthesia (AOSRA), the Latin American Society of Regional Anesthesia (LASRA), the African Society for Regional Anesthesia (AFSRA), and the Academy of Regional Anaesthesia of India (AORA).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信