Direct evidentiality and discourse in Southern Aymara

IF 0.9 1区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS
Gabriel Martínez Vera
{"title":"Direct evidentiality and discourse in Southern Aymara","authors":"Gabriel Martínez Vera","doi":"10.1007/s11050-023-09220-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This paper discusses the discourse contrasts that arise in connection to direct evidentiality in Southern Aymara (henceforth, Aymara), an understudied Andean language. Aymara has two direct evidentials, the enclitic <i>=wa</i> and the covert morpheme <i>-</i>∅, which are used whenever the speaker has the best possible grounds for some proposition. I make the novel observation that a sentence with <i>=wa</i> can be felicitously uttered if the speaker attempts to update the common ground by addressing an issue on the table. In fact, the sentence with <i>=wa</i> that is uttered must be congruent with prior discourse; I tie this to the claim that <i>=wa</i> is a (presentational) focus marker (Proulx in Language Sciences 9(1):91–102, 1987). This paper thus claims that <i>=wa</i> is a marker that combines evidentiality and focus. In contrast, uttering a sentence with <i>-</i>∅ entails that the speaker’s contribution is already in the common ground, which likens this evidential to common ground management operators—there is no congruence requirement in this case. I identify which construction can be used in different discourse settings (conversation openers and telling anecdotes). I implement a formal analysis based on Farkas and Bruce (Journal of Semantics 27:81–118, 2010) and Faller (Semantics and Pragmatics 12(8):1–53, 2019) that links evidentiality and discourse.</p>","PeriodicalId":47108,"journal":{"name":"Natural Language Semantics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Natural Language Semantics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11050-023-09220-1","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper discusses the discourse contrasts that arise in connection to direct evidentiality in Southern Aymara (henceforth, Aymara), an understudied Andean language. Aymara has two direct evidentials, the enclitic =wa and the covert morpheme -∅, which are used whenever the speaker has the best possible grounds for some proposition. I make the novel observation that a sentence with =wa can be felicitously uttered if the speaker attempts to update the common ground by addressing an issue on the table. In fact, the sentence with =wa that is uttered must be congruent with prior discourse; I tie this to the claim that =wa is a (presentational) focus marker (Proulx in Language Sciences 9(1):91–102, 1987). This paper thus claims that =wa is a marker that combines evidentiality and focus. In contrast, uttering a sentence with -∅ entails that the speaker’s contribution is already in the common ground, which likens this evidential to common ground management operators—there is no congruence requirement in this case. I identify which construction can be used in different discourse settings (conversation openers and telling anecdotes). I implement a formal analysis based on Farkas and Bruce (Journal of Semantics 27:81–118, 2010) and Faller (Semantics and Pragmatics 12(8):1–53, 2019) that links evidentiality and discourse.

Abstract Image

南艾马拉语中的直接证据性和话语
本文讨论了南艾马拉语(以下简称艾马拉语)中与直接证据性有关的话语对比,艾马拉语是一种未被充分研究的安第斯语言。艾马拉语有两个直接证据性,即外显词 =wa 和隐性词素 -∅,当说话者有最好的理由支持某个命题时,就会使用这两个直接证据性。我提出了一个新颖的观点,即如果说话者试图通过解决桌面上的一个问题来更新共同点,那么带有 =wa 的句子就能被恰当地表达出来。事实上,带有 =wa 的句子必须与先前的话语一致;我将这一点与 =wa 是(陈述性)焦点标记的说法联系起来(Proulx in Language Sciences 9(1):91-102,1987)。因此,本文认为 =wa 是一个结合了证据性和焦点性的标记。与此相反,用-∅说出一个句子就意味着说话人的贡献已经在共同语中,这就把这种证据性与共同语管理运算符相提并论--在这种情况下没有同位要求。我确定了哪种结构可用于不同的话语环境(对话开场白和讲述轶事)。我根据 Farkas 和 Bruce(《语义学杂志》27:81-118,2010 年)以及 Faller(《语义学与语用学》12(8):1-53,2019 年)的观点进行了形式分析,将证据性与话语联系起来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
27.30%
发文量
12
期刊介绍: Natural Language Semantics is devoted to semantics and its interfaces in grammar, especially syntax. The journal seeks to encourage the convergence of approaches employing the concepts of logic and philosophy with perspectives of generative grammar on the relations between meaning and structure. Natural Language Semantics publishes studies focused on linguistic phenomena as opposed to those dealing primarily with the field''s methodological and formal foundations. Representative topics include, but are not limited to, quantification, negation, modality, genericity, tense, aspect, aktionsarten, focus, presuppositions, anaphora, definiteness, plurals, mass nouns, adjectives, adverbial modification, nominalization, ellipsis, and interrogatives. The journal features mainly research articles, but also short squibs as well as remarks on and replies to pertinent books and articles.The journal has an Editorial Assistant, Christine Bartels, a copy editor with a PhD in linguistics who personally shepherds accepted manuscripts through the production process.Since 2009 this journal is covered by ISI/Social Sciences Citation Index.Springer fully understands that access to your work is important to you and to the sponsors of your research. We are listed as a green publisher in the SHERPA/RoMEO database, as we allow self-archiving, but most importantly we are fully transparent about your rights. Read more about author''s rights on: http://www.springer.com/gp/open-access/authors-rights
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信