Resource utilization and cost assessment of a proactive penicillin allergy de-labeling program for low-risk inpatients

Derek Lanoue, Adhora Mir, Carl van Walraven, Timothy Olynych, Caroline Nott, Derek R. MacFadden
{"title":"Resource utilization and cost assessment of a proactive penicillin allergy de-labeling program for low-risk inpatients","authors":"Derek Lanoue, Adhora Mir, Carl van Walraven, Timothy Olynych, Caroline Nott, Derek R. MacFadden","doi":"10.1186/s13223-023-00864-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Resource utilization and costs can impede proactive assessment and de-labeling of penicillin allergy among inpatients. Our pilot intervention was a proactive penicillin allergy de-labeling program for new inpatients with penicillin allergy. Patients deemed appropriate for a challenge with a low-risk penicillin allergy history were administered 250 mg amoxicillin and monitored for 1 h. We performed an explorative economic evaluation using various healthcare professional wages. Over two separate 2-week periods between April 2021 and March 2022, we screened 126 new inpatients with a penicillin allergy. After exclusions, 55 were appropriate for formal assessment. 19 completed the oral challenge, and 12 were directly de-labeled, resulting in a number needed to screen of 4 and a number needed to assess of 1.8 to effectively de-label one patient. The assessor’s median time in the hospital per day de-labeling was 4h08 with a range of (0h05, 6h45). A single-site annual implementation would result in 715 penicillin allergy assessments with 403 patients de-labeled assuming 20,234 annual weekday admissions and an 8.9% penicillin allergy rate. Depending on the assessor used, the annual cost of administration would be between $21,476 ($53.29 per effectively de-labeled patient) for a pharmacy technician and $61,121 ($151.67 per effectively de-labeled patient) for a Nurse Practitioner or Physician Assistant. A proactive approach, including a direct oral challenge for low-risk in-patients with penicillin allergy, appears safe and feasible. Similar programs could be implemented at other institutions across Canada to increase access to allergy assessment.","PeriodicalId":501611,"journal":{"name":"Allergy, Asthma & Clinical Immunology","volume":"112 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Allergy, Asthma & Clinical Immunology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13223-023-00864-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Resource utilization and costs can impede proactive assessment and de-labeling of penicillin allergy among inpatients. Our pilot intervention was a proactive penicillin allergy de-labeling program for new inpatients with penicillin allergy. Patients deemed appropriate for a challenge with a low-risk penicillin allergy history were administered 250 mg amoxicillin and monitored for 1 h. We performed an explorative economic evaluation using various healthcare professional wages. Over two separate 2-week periods between April 2021 and March 2022, we screened 126 new inpatients with a penicillin allergy. After exclusions, 55 were appropriate for formal assessment. 19 completed the oral challenge, and 12 were directly de-labeled, resulting in a number needed to screen of 4 and a number needed to assess of 1.8 to effectively de-label one patient. The assessor’s median time in the hospital per day de-labeling was 4h08 with a range of (0h05, 6h45). A single-site annual implementation would result in 715 penicillin allergy assessments with 403 patients de-labeled assuming 20,234 annual weekday admissions and an 8.9% penicillin allergy rate. Depending on the assessor used, the annual cost of administration would be between $21,476 ($53.29 per effectively de-labeled patient) for a pharmacy technician and $61,121 ($151.67 per effectively de-labeled patient) for a Nurse Practitioner or Physician Assistant. A proactive approach, including a direct oral challenge for low-risk in-patients with penicillin allergy, appears safe and feasible. Similar programs could be implemented at other institutions across Canada to increase access to allergy assessment.
针对低风险住院患者的主动青霉素过敏去标签计划的资源利用和成本评估
资源利用率和成本可能会阻碍对住院患者的青霉素过敏进行主动评估和去标识。我们的试点干预措施是对青霉素过敏的新住院患者实施主动青霉素过敏去标识计划。我们利用各种医疗保健专业人员的工资进行了探索性经济评估。在 2021 年 4 月至 2022 年 3 月的两个独立的 2 周期间,我们筛选了 126 名青霉素过敏的新住院患者。经过排除,55 人适合进行正式评估。其中 19 人完成了口服挑战,12 人直接解除了标签,因此有效解除一名患者标签所需的筛选人数为 4 人,评估人数为 1.8 人。评估员每天在医院进行去标记工作的时间中位数为 4 小时08 分,范围为(0 小时05 分,6 小时45 分)。假设平日年入院人数为 20,234 人,青霉素过敏率为 8.9%,那么单个医院每年将进行 715 次青霉素过敏评估,403 名患者被解除标签。根据评估人员的不同,药房技术员的年管理成本为 21,476 美元(每位有效去标签患者的成本为 53.29 美元),执业护士或助理医师的年管理成本为 61,121 美元(每位有效去标签患者的成本为 151.67 美元)。对青霉素过敏的低风险住院病人进行直接口服抗生素挑战等积极主动的方法似乎既安全又可行。加拿大的其他医疗机构也可以实施类似的计划,以增加接受过敏评估的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信