The Content of Personalised Network-Based Case Formulations

IF 1.5 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Robin van den Bergh, Merlijn Olthof, Florens Goldbeck, Konstantin Hegewald, Florian Pommerien-Becht, Nora Daniels-Wredenhagen, Rianne J. Weggemans, Silvia Scholz, Serena Daalmans, Roy Otten, Benjamin G. Aas, Anna Lichtwarck-Aschoff
{"title":"The Content of Personalised Network-Based Case Formulations","authors":"Robin van den Bergh, Merlijn Olthof, Florens Goldbeck, Konstantin Hegewald, Florian Pommerien-Becht, Nora Daniels-Wredenhagen, Rianne J. Weggemans, Silvia Scholz, Serena Daalmans, Roy Otten, Benjamin G. Aas, Anna Lichtwarck-Aschoff","doi":"10.1007/s10879-023-09613-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Case formulation is at the heart of personalised care in psychotherapy. Scientific research into case formulations can provide new insights in the heterogeneity of psychopathology which are relevant for advances in personalised psychopathology research and practice. This mixed-methods study examined the content of 483 fully personalised network-based case formulations in psychotherapy in terms of uniqueness (i.e., frequencies of concepts) and commonality (i.e., the presence of common themes over the different case formulations). In a real-world clinical care setting, patients co-created network-based case formulations with their therapist as part of their routine diagnostic process. These case formulations feature concepts that are relevant to individual patients and their current situation. We assessed how often concepts were used by different patients to quantify uniqueness. We applied a bottom-up thematic analysis to identify patient-relevant themes from the concepts. The case formulations of 483 patients diagnosed with mood and/or anxiety disorders contained a total of 4908 interpretable concepts of which 4272 (87%) were completely unique. Through thematic analysis, we identified seven overarching themes in the concepts: autonomy, connectedness, emotions, self-care, identity, self-efficacy, and bodily sensations. Case formulations were highly unique, thereby illustrating the importance of personalised diagnostics. The unique concepts could be grouped under seven overarching themes which seem to encompass basic human needs. Current advancements in personalised diagnostics and assessment should have a broader scope than symptoms alone, and could use the themes identified here as part of a topic list in the generation of (network-based) case formulations.</p>","PeriodicalId":46994,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY PSYCHOTHERAPY","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY PSYCHOTHERAPY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10879-023-09613-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Case formulation is at the heart of personalised care in psychotherapy. Scientific research into case formulations can provide new insights in the heterogeneity of psychopathology which are relevant for advances in personalised psychopathology research and practice. This mixed-methods study examined the content of 483 fully personalised network-based case formulations in psychotherapy in terms of uniqueness (i.e., frequencies of concepts) and commonality (i.e., the presence of common themes over the different case formulations). In a real-world clinical care setting, patients co-created network-based case formulations with their therapist as part of their routine diagnostic process. These case formulations feature concepts that are relevant to individual patients and their current situation. We assessed how often concepts were used by different patients to quantify uniqueness. We applied a bottom-up thematic analysis to identify patient-relevant themes from the concepts. The case formulations of 483 patients diagnosed with mood and/or anxiety disorders contained a total of 4908 interpretable concepts of which 4272 (87%) were completely unique. Through thematic analysis, we identified seven overarching themes in the concepts: autonomy, connectedness, emotions, self-care, identity, self-efficacy, and bodily sensations. Case formulations were highly unique, thereby illustrating the importance of personalised diagnostics. The unique concepts could be grouped under seven overarching themes which seem to encompass basic human needs. Current advancements in personalised diagnostics and assessment should have a broader scope than symptoms alone, and could use the themes identified here as part of a topic list in the generation of (network-based) case formulations.

Abstract Image

基于网络的个性化案例表述的内容
个案配方是心理治疗中个性化护理的核心。对病例的科学研究可以为心理病理学的异质性提供新的见解,这与个性化心理病理学研究和实践的进步息息相关。这项混合方法研究从独特性(即概念出现的频率)和共通性(即不同案例中存在共同的主题)两个方面考察了心理治疗中 483 个完全个性化的网络案例。在真实世界的临床护理环境中,患者与治疗师共同创建了基于网络的病例表述,作为常规诊断过程的一部分。这些病例公式的特点是与患者个人及其当前情况相关的概念。我们评估了不同患者使用概念的频率,以量化独特性。我们采用自下而上的主题分析法,从概念中找出与患者相关的主题。483 名被诊断为情绪障碍和/或焦虑症的患者的病例陈述共包含 4908 个可解释的概念,其中 4272 个(87%)是完全独特的。通过主题分析,我们确定了这些概念中的七大主题:自主、联系、情绪、自我护理、身份认同、自我效能和身体感觉。病例的表述非常独特,从而说明了个性化诊断的重要性。这些独特的概念可归纳为七大主题,似乎包含了人类的基本需求。目前,个性化诊断和评估的进展应该比单纯的症状范围更广,在生成(基于网络的)病例公式时,可以将这里确定的主题作为主题列表的一部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
5.00%
发文量
44
期刊介绍: Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy provides an international forum to critique the complexities and controversies facing psychotherapists. The journal publishes original peer-reviewed articles that critically analyze theory, research, or clinical practice. Empirical studies, panel discussions, essays, case studies, brief reports, and theoretical articles are published. Psychotherapists and clinical researchers will find this journal an important vehicle to review the problems of treating a variety of patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信