Nephron sparing surgery for renal hilar tumours: short-term follow-up of predominantly robot-assisted surgery cohort

IF 0.5 Q4 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Anandan Murugesan, Ramesh Chinnusamy, Devdas Madhavan
{"title":"Nephron sparing surgery for renal hilar tumours: short-term follow-up of predominantly robot-assisted surgery cohort","authors":"Anandan Murugesan, Ramesh Chinnusamy, Devdas Madhavan","doi":"10.1186/s12301-024-00410-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Hilar tumours are the renal tumours, which abut the renal artery or vein. Nephron sparing surgery (NSS) is of proven benefit among those with small renal masses. Hilar tumours are usually offered radical surgery due to the presumed difficulty in dissection, upgrading to tumour stage, and risk of conversion to radical surgery. We present our results of patients with hilar tumour undergoing nephron sparing surgery. We performed a retrospective analysis of patients who underwent NSS for renal hilar tumours in our tertiary referral institute from June 2017 to December 2022. The case sheets of all the patients who had undergone NSS were analysed and their radiology images reviewed. Those with hilar tumours were analysed based on demographic characters, perioperative and postoperative and follow-up details. Among a total of 21 patients undergoing partial nephrectomy, ten had hilar tumours. The median age was 43 years. Nine patients had robot-assisted partial nephrectomy and one underwent open partial nephrectomy. Seven patients had incidentally detected tumours. One had Grade 3 chronic kidney disease. The mean operative time and robot console time were 225 and 125 min, respectively. Median warm ischaemia time (WIT) was 36 min (25–48 min). One patient had grade 2 complication and two had grade 3 complication. Eight had clear cell renal cell carcinoma and one had positive margin. None had recurrence at a median follow-up of 38 months. Nephron sparing surgery, especially with robot-assisted approach, is feasible in hilar tumours with prognosis and complications similar to non-hilar tumours in short-term follow-up.","PeriodicalId":7432,"journal":{"name":"African Journal of Urology","volume":"203 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"African Journal of Urology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12301-024-00410-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Hilar tumours are the renal tumours, which abut the renal artery or vein. Nephron sparing surgery (NSS) is of proven benefit among those with small renal masses. Hilar tumours are usually offered radical surgery due to the presumed difficulty in dissection, upgrading to tumour stage, and risk of conversion to radical surgery. We present our results of patients with hilar tumour undergoing nephron sparing surgery. We performed a retrospective analysis of patients who underwent NSS for renal hilar tumours in our tertiary referral institute from June 2017 to December 2022. The case sheets of all the patients who had undergone NSS were analysed and their radiology images reviewed. Those with hilar tumours were analysed based on demographic characters, perioperative and postoperative and follow-up details. Among a total of 21 patients undergoing partial nephrectomy, ten had hilar tumours. The median age was 43 years. Nine patients had robot-assisted partial nephrectomy and one underwent open partial nephrectomy. Seven patients had incidentally detected tumours. One had Grade 3 chronic kidney disease. The mean operative time and robot console time were 225 and 125 min, respectively. Median warm ischaemia time (WIT) was 36 min (25–48 min). One patient had grade 2 complication and two had grade 3 complication. Eight had clear cell renal cell carcinoma and one had positive margin. None had recurrence at a median follow-up of 38 months. Nephron sparing surgery, especially with robot-assisted approach, is feasible in hilar tumours with prognosis and complications similar to non-hilar tumours in short-term follow-up.
肾门静脉肿瘤的肾小管疏通手术:以机器人辅助手术为主的队列的短期随访
肾门肿瘤是指与肾动脉或静脉相邻的肾肿瘤。事实证明,肾小球肿瘤患者可接受肾小球保全手术(NSS)。肝门部肿瘤通常需要进行根治性手术,原因是解剖困难、肿瘤分期升级以及转为根治性手术的风险。我们介绍了接受肾盂保留手术的肾门部肿瘤患者的结果。我们对 2017 年 6 月至 2022 年 12 月期间在我们的三级转诊机构接受肾门部肿瘤 NSS 的患者进行了回顾性分析。我们对所有接受 NSS 的患者的病例表进行了分析,并回顾了他们的放射学图像。根据人口统计学特征、围手术期、术后和随访细节对患有肾门部肿瘤的患者进行了分析。在接受肾部分切除术的 21 位患者中,有 10 位患有肾门肿瘤。中位年龄为 43 岁。九名患者接受了机器人辅助肾部分切除术,一名患者接受了开放式肾部分切除术。七名患者偶然发现肿瘤。一名患者患有三级慢性肾病。平均手术时间和机器人控制台时间分别为225分钟和125分钟。中位热缺血时间(WIT)为36分钟(25-48分钟)。一名患者出现二级并发症,两名患者出现三级并发症。八名患者为透明细胞肾细胞癌,一名患者为边缘阳性。中位随访38个月,无一复发。肾小管保留手术,尤其是机器人辅助方法,对肾门肿瘤是可行的,短期随访的预后和并发症与非肾门肿瘤相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
African Journal of Urology
African Journal of Urology UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
58
审稿时长
9 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信